Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Community Spring For Neuroscience Data Sharing

A Community Spring For Neuroscience Data Sharing Neuroinform (2014) 12:509–511 DOI 10.1007/s12021-014-9246-1 EDITORIAL Giorgio A. Ascoli Published online: 14 October 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 I consider 2014 up to now a good year for neuroscience data improves research reproducibility, an argument long sustained sharing. This positive feeling is rooted in my personal expe- by many exponents of neuroinformatics that everyone in that rience with three interesting events that took place in the short room seemed to agree with as a matter of fact. span of five months during the first half of this year. While all Although I attended the whole meeting and found nearly all three events occurred on US soil and were organized by content relevant to neuroinformatics, this is particularly true of American institutions, I believe they reflect an international the session dedicated to editorial policies for maximizing data trend. The world-wide reach of the implications for the field sharing. The fact that I was specifically invited as a founding should be of interest to the readers of our journal and to all co-editor of Neuroinformatics (the only neuroscience journal neuroinformatics stakeholders at large. represented at the meeting) to offer my remarks in this session The first event I attended http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Neuroinformatics Springer Journals

A Community Spring For Neuroscience Data Sharing

Neuroinformatics , Volume 12 (4) – Oct 14, 2014

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-community-spring-for-neuroscience-data-sharing-OXFvrrM09E
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by Springer Science+Business Media New York
Subject
Biomedicine; Neurosciences; Bioinformatics; Computational Biology/Bioinformatics; Computer Appl. in Life Sciences; Neurology
ISSN
1539-2791
eISSN
1559-0089
DOI
10.1007/s12021-014-9246-1
pmid
25310964
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Neuroinform (2014) 12:509–511 DOI 10.1007/s12021-014-9246-1 EDITORIAL Giorgio A. Ascoli Published online: 14 October 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 I consider 2014 up to now a good year for neuroscience data improves research reproducibility, an argument long sustained sharing. This positive feeling is rooted in my personal expe- by many exponents of neuroinformatics that everyone in that rience with three interesting events that took place in the short room seemed to agree with as a matter of fact. span of five months during the first half of this year. While all Although I attended the whole meeting and found nearly all three events occurred on US soil and were organized by content relevant to neuroinformatics, this is particularly true of American institutions, I believe they reflect an international the session dedicated to editorial policies for maximizing data trend. The world-wide reach of the implications for the field sharing. The fact that I was specifically invited as a founding should be of interest to the readers of our journal and to all co-editor of Neuroinformatics (the only neuroscience journal neuroinformatics stakeholders at large. represented at the meeting) to offer my remarks in this session The first event I attended

Journal

NeuroinformaticsSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 14, 2014

There are no references for this article.