Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Brief History of Neuronal Reconstruction

A Brief History of Neuronal Reconstruction Neuroinform (2011) 9:119–128 DOI 10.1007/s12021-011-9107-0 COMMENTARY Stephen L. Senft Published online: 24 February 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 The routes taken by peripheral nerves and the intricacy neither stained nor fixed—it is likely that Hooke would present even in the external features of the CNS had been have seen merely a glistening blur having a range of understood in considerable detail at the time of Andreas whitish and greyish tinges. In Italy, Marcello Malpighi was Vesalius (1543) and Bartholomeo Eustatius (1552). But the in fact, at that time, painstakingly examining brain under astonishing underlying and microscopically symplectic the microscope. He also boiled that tissue in water, or character of CNS brain tissue only became evident in fitful smeared it with ink, and by 1665 was thus able to discern stages and over the following 300 and 50 years. Today’s fibers (which he interpreted as glandular) in spinal cord, opportunity to precisely reconstruct individual neurons and fish optic nerve and corpus callosum, and in human white circuits, presently expressed in the DIADEM challenge, is matter. Availed with even higher magnification, Antony van based on a long sequence of conceptual and technological Leeuwenhoek peered at fresh cow optic nerve in http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Neuroinformatics Springer Journals

A Brief History of Neuronal Reconstruction

Senft, Stephen
Neuroinformatics , Volume 9 (3) – Feb 24, 2011
Download PDF
10 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-brief-history-of-neuronal-reconstruction-C0z7Z76vz7

References (11)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Biomedicine; Computational Biology/Bioinformatics; Neurosciences ; Neurology; Computer Appl. in Life Sciences ; Bioinformatics
ISSN
1539-2791
eISSN
1559-0089
DOI
10.1007/s12021-011-9107-0
pmid
21347713
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Neuroinform (2011) 9:119–128 DOI 10.1007/s12021-011-9107-0 COMMENTARY Stephen L. Senft Published online: 24 February 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 The routes taken by peripheral nerves and the intricacy neither stained nor fixed—it is likely that Hooke would present even in the external features of the CNS had been have seen merely a glistening blur having a range of understood in considerable detail at the time of Andreas whitish and greyish tinges. In Italy, Marcello Malpighi was Vesalius (1543) and Bartholomeo Eustatius (1552). But the in fact, at that time, painstakingly examining brain under astonishing underlying and microscopically symplectic the microscope. He also boiled that tissue in water, or character of CNS brain tissue only became evident in fitful smeared it with ink, and by 1665 was thus able to discern stages and over the following 300 and 50 years. Today’s fibers (which he interpreted as glandular) in spinal cord, opportunity to precisely reconstruct individual neurons and fish optic nerve and corpus callosum, and in human white circuits, presently expressed in the DIADEM challenge, is matter. Availed with even higher magnification, Antony van based on a long sequence of conceptual and technological Leeuwenhoek peered at fresh cow optic nerve in

Journal

Neuroinformatics – Springer Journals

Published: Feb 24, 2011

There are no references for this article.