Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Friedewald, E. Rafferty, S. Rose, M. Durand, D. Plecha, Julianne Greenberg, M. Hayes, D. Copit, Kara Carlson, T. Cink, L. Barke, Linda Greer, Dave Miller, E. Conant (2014)
Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.JAMA, 311 24
S. Shen, A. Bloomquist, G. Mawdsley, M. Yaffe, I. Elbakri (2006)
Effect of scatter and an antiscatter grid on the performance of a slot-scanning digital mammography system.Medical physics, 33 4
(1985)
Screening for Breast CancerThe Lancet, 325
(1998)
XMuDat: photon attenuation data,
P. Bakic, D. Pokrajac, R. Caro, Andrew Maidment (2014)
Realistic Simulation of Breast Tissue Microstructure in Software Anthropomorphic Phantoms
Jun Zhou, Bo Zhao, Wei Zhao (2007)
A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system.Medical physics, 34 3
F. Gilbert, L. Tucker, M. Gillan, P. Willsher, J. Cooke, K. Duncan, M. Michell, H. Dobson, Y. Lim, H. Purushothaman, C. Strudley, S. Astley, O. Morrish, K. Young, S. Duffy (2015)
The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone.Health technology assessment, 19 4
L. Cockmartin, N. Marshall, Guozhi Zhang, K. Lemmens, E. Shaheen, C. Ongeval, E. Fredenberg, D. Dance, E. Salvagnini, K. Michielsen, H. Bosmans (2017)
Design and application of a structured phantom for detection performance comparison between breast tomosynthesis and digital mammographyPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 62
P. Bakic, B. Barufaldi, D. Higginbotham, S. Weinstein, A. Avanaki, K. Espig, A. Xthona, T. Kimpe, Andrew Maidment (2018)
Virtual clinical trial of lesion detection in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis, 10573
(1985)
Siddon, “Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a 3D CT array,”Med
J. Hubbell, S. Seltzer (2005)
XCOM : Photon Cross Sections Database
A. Burgess, F. Jacobson, P. Judy (2001)
Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise.Medical physics, 28 4
(2018)
a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study,” Lancet Oncol
Frank Schebesch, M. Herbst, T. Mertelmeier, A. Maier, L. Ritschl (2018)
A hybrid approach for virtual clinical trials for mammographic imaging, 10718
P. Elangovan, L. Warren, Alistair Mackenzie, Alaleh Rashidnasab, Oliver Díaz, D. Dance, K. Young, H. Bosmans, C. Strudley, K. Wells (2014)
Development and validation of a modelling framework for simulating 2D-mammography and breast tomosynthesis imagesPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 59
P. Skaane, A. Bandos, Randi Gullien, Ellen Eben, Ulrika Ekseth, U. Haakenaasen, Mina Izadi, I. Jebsen, Gunnar Jahr, Mona Krager, L. Niklason, S. Hofvind, D. Gur (2013)
Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.Radiology, 267 1
W. Que, J. Rowlands (1995)
X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: inherent spatial resolution.Medical physics, 22 4
E. Shaheen, C. Ongeval, F. Zanca, L. Cockmartin, N. Marshall, J. Jacobs, K. Young, David Dance, H. Bosmans (2011)
The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.Medical physics, 38 12
(2012)
four practical methods compared,” Med
Christoph Luckner, Frank Schebesch, T. Mertelmeier, A. Fieselmann, A. Maier, L. Ritschl (2018)
Towards an analytic model describing the effect of scan angle and slice thickness on the in-plane spatial resolution of calcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis, 10718
T. Mertelmeier, J. Orman, Wolfgang Haerer, Mithun Dudam (2006)
Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis prototype device, 6142
Alistair Mackenzie, N. Marshall, A. Hadjipanteli, D. Dance, H. Bosmans, K. Young (2017)
Characterisation of noise and sharpness of images from four digital breast tomosynthesis systems for simulation of images for virtual clinical trialsPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 62
(2018)
Protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of digital breast tomosynthesis systems (v1.03),
L. Vancoillie, N. Marshall, L. Cockmartin, J. Vignero, H. Bosmans (2019)
Verification of the accuracy of a partial breast imaging simulation framework for virtual clinical trial applications, 10948
E. Salvagnini, H. Bosmans, L. Struelens, N. Marshall (2012)
Quantification of scattered radiation in projection mammography: four practical methods compared.Medical physics, 39 6
S. Vedantham, A. Karellas, G. Vijayaraghavan, D. Kopans (2015)
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.Radiology, 277 3
F. Gilbert, L. Tucker, K. Young (2016)
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool.Clinical radiology, 71 2
S. Zackrisson, K. Lång, A. Rosso, Kristin Johnson, M. Dustler, D. Förnvik, Hannie Förnvik, H. Sartor, P. Timberg, A. Tingberg, I. Andersson (2018)
One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.The Lancet. Oncology, 19 11
N. Marshall, H. Bosmans (2012)
Measurements of system sharpness for two digital breast tomosynthesis systemsPhysics in Medicine and Biology, 57
(2018)
510(k) clearances-FDA
A. Badano, C. Graff, A. Badal, D. Sharma, R. Zeng, Frank Samuelson, Stephen Glick, Kyle Myers (2018)
Evaluation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis as Replacement of Full-Field Digital Mammography Using an In Silico Imaging TrialJAMA Network Open, 1
J. Boone, T. Fewell, R. Jennings (1997)
Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography.Medical physics, 24 12
(1995)
Inherent spatial resolution,” Med
J. Jacobs, N. Marshall, L. Cockmartin, F. Zanca, R. Engen, K. Young, H. Bosmans, E. Samei (2010)
Toward an international consensus strategy for periodic quality control of digital breast tomosynthesis systems, 7622
B. Barufaldi, D. Higginbotham, P. Bakic, Andrew Maidment (2018)
OpenVCT: a GPU-accelerated virtual clinical trial pipeline for mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis, 10573
E. Shaheen, F. Zanca, F. Sisini, G. Zhang, J. Jacobs, H. Bosmans (2010)
Simulation of 3D objects into breast tomosynthesis images.Radiation protection dosimetry, 139 1-3
Ehsan Samei, Ehsan Samei, Michael Flynn, Michael Flynn, David Reimann (1998)
A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device.Medical physics, 25 1
AbstractPurpose: The impact of system parameters on signal detectability can be studied with simulation platforms. We describe the steps taken to verify and confirm the accuracy of a local platform developed for the use in virtual clinical trials.Approach: The platform simulates specific targets into existing two-dimensional full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis images acquired on a Siemens Inspiration system. There are three steps: (1) creation of voxel models or analytical objects; (2) generation of a realistic object template with accurate resolution, scatter, and noise properties; and (3) insertion and reconstruction. Four objects were simulated: a 0.5-mm aluminium (Al) sphere and a 0.2-mm-thick Al sheet in a PMMA stack, a 0.8-mm steel edge and a three-dimensional mass model in a structured background phantom. Simulated results were compared to acquired data.Results: Peak contrast and signal difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) were in close agreement (<5 % error) for both sphere and sheet. The similarity of pixel value profiles for sphere and sheet in the xy direction and the artifact spread function for real and simulated spheres confirmed accurate geometric modeling. Absolute and relative average deviation between modulation transfer function measured from a real and simulated edges showed accurate sharpness modelling for spatial frequencies up to the Nyquist frequency. Real and simulated objects could not be differentiated visually.Conclusions: The results indicate that this simulation framework is a strong candidate for use in virtual clinical studies.
Journal of Medical Imaging – SPIE
Published: Jul 1, 2020
Keywords: breast imaging; simulation framework; digital mammography; digital breast tomosynthesis; virtual clinical trial
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.