Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Table 2 Observers' recall decisions in the current study
M. Castelhano, J. Henderson (2007)
Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 33 4
M. Posner, D. Presti (1987)
Selective attention and cognitive controlTrends in Neurosciences, 10
A. Carrigan, S. Wardle, Anina Rich (2019)
Do target detection and target localization always go together? Extracting information from briefly presented displaysAttention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81
K. Evans, A. Culpan, J. Wolfe (2019)
Detecting the "gist" of breast cancer in mammograms three years before localized signs of cancer are visible.The British journal of radiology, 92 1099
D. Bernardi, S. Ciatto, M. Pellegrini, Anesi, S. Burlon, E. Cauli, M. Depaoli, L. Larentis, Malesani, L. Targa, P. Baldo, N. Houssami (2012)
Application of breast tomosynthesis in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time.The British journal of radiology, 85 1020
C. Nodine, C. Mello-Thoms, H. Kundel, S. Weinstein (2002)
Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 179 4
S. Hillis (2007)
A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom methods for multiple observer ROC analysisStatistics in Medicine, 26
D. Dorfman, K. Berbaum, C. Metz (1992)
Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method.Investigative radiology, 27 9
A. Friedman (1979)
Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 108 3
S. Hillis, N. Obuchowski, K. Schartz, K. Berbaum (2005)
A comparison of the Dorfman–Berbaum–Metz and Obuchowski–Rockette methods for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) dataStatistics in Medicine, 24
(1995)
an anova approach with dependent observations,” Commun
Wu is a postdoctoral research fellow at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School. His research interests include medical image perception, visual search, and eye tracking
M. Greene, A. Oliva (2009)
The Briefest of Glances The Time Course of Natural Scene UnderstandingPsychological Science, 20
Abel Oliva (2005)
Gist of a scene
H. Kundel, C. Nodine (1975)
Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search.Radiology, 116 3
(2009)
The Time Course of Natural Scene Understanding
(2005)
where does the time go?” in IEEE Comput
P. Brennan, Z. Gandomkar, E. Ekpo, K. Tapia, P. Trieu, S. Lewis, J. Wolfe, K. Evans (2018)
Radiologists can detect the ‘gist’ of breast cancer before any overt signs of cancer appearScientific Reports, 8
K. Evans, R. Birdwell, J. Wolfe (2013)
If You Don’t Find It Often, You Often Don’t Find It: Why Some Cancers Are Missed in Breast Cancer ScreeningPLoS ONE, 8
K. Evans, M. Cohen, R. Tambouret, T. Horowitz, Erica Kreindel, J. Wolfe (2011)
Does visual expertise improve visual recognition memory?Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73
N. Obuchowski, H. Rockette (1995)
Hypothesis testing of diagnostic accuracy for multiple readers and multiple tests: An anova approach with dependent observationsCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 24
Barbara Hidalgo-Sotelo, A. Oliva, A. Torralba (2005)
Human Learning of Contextual Priors for Object Search: Where does the time go?2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) - Workshops
K. Evans, Diane Georgian-Smith, R. Tambouret, R. Birdwell, J. Wolfe (2012)
The gist of the abnormal: Above-chance medical decision making in the blink of an eyePsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20
J. Oestmann, R. Greene, D. Kushner, P. Bourgouin, L. Linetsky, H. Llewellyn (1988)
Lung lesions: correlation between viewing time and detection.Radiology, 166 2
D. Carmody, C. Nodine, H. Kundel (1981)
Finding lung nodules with and without comparative visual scanningPerception & Psychophysics, 29
Hayden Schill, A. Culpan, J. Wolfe, K. Evans (2017)
Detecting the gist of breast cancer in mammograms three years before the cancer appears.Journal of Vision, 17
S. Hillis, K. Berbaum, C. Metz (2008)
Recent developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis.Academic radiology, 15 5
J. Wolfe, T. Horowitz (2017)
Five factors that guide attention in visual searchNature Human Behaviour, 1
D. Sagi (2011)
Perceptual learning in Vision ResearchVision Research, 51
Michiel Kallenberg, K. Petersen, M. Nielsen, A. Ng, Pengfei Diao, C. Igel, C. Vachon, Katharina Holland, R. Winkel, N. Karssemeijer, M. Lillholm (2016)
Unsupervised Deep Learning Applied to Breast Density Segmentation and Mammographic Risk ScoringIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 35
A. Gastounioti, Andrew Oustimov, Meng-Kang Hsieh, Lauren Pantalone, E. Conant, D. Kontos (2018)
Using Convolutional Neural Networks for Enhanced Capture of Breast Parenchymal Complexity Patterns Associated with Breast Cancer Risk.Academic radiology, 25 8
C. Rovee-Collier, E. Hankins, R. Bhatt (1992)
Textons, visual pop-out effects, and object recognition in infancy.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 121 4
D. Gur, Gordon Abrams, D. Chough, M. Ganott, C. Hakim, R. Perrin, Grace Rathfon, J. Sumkin, M. Zuley, A. Bandos (2009)
Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 193 2
(2009)
observer performance study,” AJR Am
K. Evans, T. Haygood, Julie Cooper, A. Culpan, J. Wolfe (2016)
A half-second glimpse often lets radiologists identify breast cancer cases even when viewing the mammogram of the opposite breastProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113
Abstract.Evans et al. (2016) showed that radiologists can classify the mammograms as normal or abnormal at above-chance levels after a 250-ms exposure. Our study documents a similar gist signal in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images. DBT is a relatively new technology that creates a three-dimensional image set of slices through the volume of the breast. It improves performance over two-dimensional (2-D) mammography but at a cost in reading time. In the experiment presented, radiologists (N = 16) viewed “movies” of DBT images from single breasts for an average of 1.5 s per case. Observers then marked the most likely lesion position on a blank outline and rated each case on a six-point scale from (1) certainly normal to (6) certainly recall. Results show that radiologists can discriminate normal from abnormal DBT cases at above-chance levels as in 2-D mammography. Ability was correlated with experience reading DBT. Observers performed at above-chance levels, even on those images where they could not localize the target, suggesting that this is a global signal that could prove valuable in the clinic.
Journal of Medical Imaging – SPIE
Published: Mar 1, 2020
Keywords: perception; tomography; gist processing
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.