Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Taylor, Y. Lam, D. Boning (2009)
A computationally simple method for simulating the micro-embossing of thermoplastic layersJournal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 19
(2015)
Enabling layout and process optimization with fast, full-field simulation of droplet-dispensed UV-NIL,” presented at Nanoimprint and Nanoprint
T. Glinsner, G. Kreindl, EVGroup Thallner (2010)
Nanoimprint Lithography
10 (a), (b) RLT distribution obtained by local-mode simulation
(1999)
a new approach to high-resolution patterning,” Proc
K. Fukuhara, Masato Suzuki, Masaki Mitsuyasu, T. Kono, T. Nakasugi, Yonghyun Lim, W. Jung (2017)
Overlay control for nanoimprint lithography, 10144
S. Kobayashi, R. Inanami, H. Tsuda, Kazuhiro Washida, M. Komori, K. Yamashita, Ji-Young Im, T. Kono, S. Maeda (2017)
RLT uniformity improvement utilizing multi-scale NIL process simulation, 10144
M. Colburn, Stephen Johnson, M. Stewart, S. Damle, T. Bailey, Bernard Choi, M. Wedlake, Timothy Michaelson, S. Sreenivasan, J. Ekerdt, C. Willson (1999)
Step and flash imprint lithography: a new approach to high-resolution patterning, 3676
S. Kobayashi, M. Komori, Inanami Ryoichi, K. Yamashita, A. Mimotogi, Ji-Young Im, M. Hatano, T. Kono, S. Maeda (2016)
Design for nanoimprint lithography: total layout refinement utilizing NIL process simulation, 9777
M. Colburn, T. Bailey, B. Choi, J. Ekerdt, S. Sreenivasan, C. Willson (2001)
Development and advantages of step-and-flash lithography
S. Fujimori (2009)
Fine Pattern Fabrication by the Molded Mask Method (Nanoimprint Lithography) in the 1970sJapanese Journal of Applied Physics, 48
(2018)
hot spot modification through total NIL process simulation,” Proc
(2015)
Enabling layout and process optimization with fast, full-field simulation of droplet-dispensed UV-NIL
K. Selinidis, C. Brooks, Gary Doyle, L. Brown, Chris Jones, Joseph Imhof, D. Labrake, D. Resnick, S. Sreenivasan (2011)
Progress in mask replication using jet and flash imprint lithography, 7970
H. Taylor, D. Boning (2010)
Towards nanoimprint lithography-aware layout design checking, 7641
T. Whidden, D. Ferry, M. Kozicki, Enoch Kim, Amit Kumar, J. Wilbur, G. Whitesides (1996)
Pattern transfer to silicon by microcontact printing and RIENanotechnology, 7
(2013)
auto-accelerated ILU preconditioner for sparse linear systems,” SIAM J
S. Kobayashi, K. Yamashita, H. Tsuda, Kazuhiro Washida, M. Komori, Ji-Young Im, T. Kono, T. Nakasugi (2018)
Design for nanoimprint lithography: hot spot modification through total NIL process simulation, 10584
(2016)
total layout refinement utilizing NIL process simulation,” Proc
Yukio Takabayashi, T. Iwanaga, Mitsuru Hiura, Hiroshi Morohoshi, Tatsuya Hayashi, Takamitsu Komaki (2019)
Nanoimprint system alignment and overlay improvement for high volume semiconductor manufacturing, 10958
(2013)
A 2 ILU: auto-accelerated ILU preconditioner for sparse linear systems
Wei Zhang, B. Fletcher, E. Thompson, Weijun Liu, T. Stachowiak, N. Khusnatdinov, J. Irving, Whitney Longsine, M. Traub, Van Truskett, D. Labrake, Zhengmao Ye (2016)
High throughput Jet and Flash Imprint Lithography for semiconductor memory applications, 9777
K. Selenidis, J. Maltabes, I. Mcmackin, J. Perez, W. Martin, D. Resnick, S. Sreenivasan (2007)
Defect reduction progress in step and flash imprint lithography, 6730
J. Seki, Yuichiro Oguchi, N. Kiyohara, Koshiro Suzuki, K. Nagane, S. Narioka, T. Nakayama, Y. Shiode, S. Aihara, T. Asano (2020)
Enabling nanoimprint simulator for quality verification; Process-design co-optimization toward high volume manufacturing, 11328
T. Kono, M. Hatano, H. Tokue, Hirokazu Kato, K. Fukuhara, T. Nakasugi (2019)
Half-pitch 14nm direct patterning with nanoimprint lithography, 10958
T. Bailey, D. Resnick, David Mancini, K. Nordquist, W. Dauksher, E. Ainley, A. Talin, K. Gehoski, J. Baker, B. Choi, S. Johnson, M. Colburn, M. Meissl, S. Sreenivasan, J. Ekerdt, C. Willson (2002)
Template fabrication schemes for step and flash imprint lithographyMicroelectronic Engineering, 61
H. Taylor (2016)
Defectivity prediction for droplet-dispensed UV nanoimprint lithography, enabled by fast simulation of resin flow at feature, droplet, and template scales, 9777
(2017)
Full-template simulation of resin droplet spreading and coalescence for process optimization
G. Schmid, Michael Miller, C. Brooks, N. Khusnatdinov, D. Labrake, D. Resnick, S. Sreenivasan, Gene Gauzner, Kim Lee, D. Kuo, D. Weller, Xiaoming Yang (2009)
Step and flash imprint lithography for manufacturing patterned media, 7271
(2017)
Full-template simulation of resin droplet spreading and coalescence for process optimization,” presented at NIL Industrial Day Workshop, Berlin (2017)
Anshuman Cherala, S. Im, M. Meissl, A. Hussein, L. Simpson, R. Minter, E. Thompson, Jin Choi, Mitsuru Hiura, Satoshi Iino (2019)
Topography and flatness induced overlay distortion correction using resist drop pattern compensation in nanoimprint lithography systems, 10958
I. Mcmackin, Jin Choi, P. Schumaker, V. Nguyen, F. Xu, E. Thompson, D. Babbs, S. Sreenivasan, M. Watts, N. Schumaker (2004)
Step and Repeat UV nanoimprint lithography tools and processes, 5374
(2016)
Defectivity simulation in nanoimprint lithography using a boundary element model for resist droplet spreading and coalescence,
Abstract.Computational technologies are still in the course of development for nanoimprint lithography (NIL). Only a few simulators are applicable to the nanoimprint process, and these simulators are desired by device manufacturers as part of their daily toolbox. The most challenging issue in NIL process simulation is the scale difference of each component of the system. The template pattern depth and the residual resist film thickness are generally of the order of a few tens of nanometers, whereas the process needs to work over the entire shot size, which is typically of the order of several hundred square millimeters. This amounts to a scale difference of the order of 106. Therefore, in order to calculate the nanoimprint process with conventional fluid structure interaction simulators, an enormous number of meshes is required, which results in computation times that are unacceptable. We introduce a process simulator which directly inputs the process parameters, simulates the whole imprinting process, and evaluates the quality of the resulting resist film for jet and flash imprint lithography process. To overcome the scale differences, our simulator utilizes analytically integrated expressions which reduce the dimensions of the calculation region. In addition, the simulator can independently consider the resist droplet configurations and calculate the droplet coalescence, thereby predicting the distribution of the non-fill areas which originate from the trapped gas between the droplets. The simulator has been applied to the actual NIL system and some examples of its applications are presented here.
Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology – SPIE
Published: Jan 1, 2022
Keywords: nanoimprint lithography; simulation; fluid structure interaction; computation fluid dynamics
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.