Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(XuJ.et al., “A deep convolutional neural network for segmenting and classifying epithelial and stromal regions in histopathological images,” Neurocomputing 191, 214–223 (2016).NRCGEO0925-231210.1016/j.neucom.2016.01.03428154470)
XuJ.et al., “A deep convolutional neural network for segmenting and classifying epithelial and stromal regions in histopathological images,” Neurocomputing 191, 214–223 (2016).NRCGEO0925-231210.1016/j.neucom.2016.01.03428154470XuJ.et al., “A deep convolutional neural network for segmenting and classifying epithelial and stromal regions in histopathological images,” Neurocomputing 191, 214–223 (2016).NRCGEO0925-231210.1016/j.neucom.2016.01.03428154470, XuJ.et al., “A deep convolutional neural network for segmenting and classifying epithelial and stromal regions in histopathological images,” Neurocomputing 191, 214–223 (2016).NRCGEO0925-231210.1016/j.neucom.2016.01.03428154470
K. Simonyan, Andrew Zisserman (2014)
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image RecognitionCoRR, abs/1409.1556
O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, T. Brox (2015)
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image SegmentationArXiv, abs/1505.04597
Marc Macenko, M. Niethammer, J. Marron, D. Borland, J. Woosley, Xiaojun Guan, Charles Schmitt, N. Thomas (2009)
A method for normalizing histology slides for quantitative analysis2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro
J. Epstein, M. Zelefsky, D. Sjoberg, J. Nelson, L. Egevad, C. Magi-Galluzzi, A. Vickers, A. Parwani, V. Reuter, S. Fine, J. Eastham, P. Wiklund, Misop Han, C. Reddy, J. Ciezki, T. Nyberg, E. Klein (2016)
A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score.European urology, 69 3
W. Bulten, C. Kaa, J. Laak, G. Litjens (2018)
Automated segmentation of epithelial tissue in prostatectomy slides using deep learning, 10581
(NaikS.et al., “Gland segmentation and computerized Gleason grading of prostate histology by integrating low-, high-level and domain specific information,” in MIAAB Workshop, Citeseer, pp. 1–8 (2007).)
NaikS.et al., “Gland segmentation and computerized Gleason grading of prostate histology by integrating low-, high-level and domain specific information,” in MIAAB Workshop, Citeseer, pp. 1–8 (2007).NaikS.et al., “Gland segmentation and computerized Gleason grading of prostate histology by integrating low-, high-level and domain specific information,” in MIAAB Workshop, Citeseer, pp. 1–8 (2007)., NaikS.et al., “Gland segmentation and computerized Gleason grading of prostate histology by integrating low-, high-level and domain specific information,” in MIAAB Workshop, Citeseer, pp. 1–8 (2007).
(2017)
rapid training data creation with weak supervision,” Proc
(2018)
learning from multiple experts,” Med
(BadrinarayananV.KendallA.CipollaR., “SegNet: a deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39(12), 2481–2495 (2017).ITPIDJ0162-882810.1109/TPAMI.2016.264461528060704)
BadrinarayananV.KendallA.CipollaR., “SegNet: a deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39(12), 2481–2495 (2017).ITPIDJ0162-882810.1109/TPAMI.2016.264461528060704BadrinarayananV.KendallA.CipollaR., “SegNet: a deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39(12), 2481–2495 (2017).ITPIDJ0162-882810.1109/TPAMI.2016.264461528060704, BadrinarayananV.KendallA.CipollaR., “SegNet: a deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39(12), 2481–2495 (2017).ITPIDJ0162-882810.1109/TPAMI.2016.264461528060704
(CsurkaG.et al., “What is a good evaluation measure for semantic segmentation?” in Proc. Br. Mach. Vision Conf., pp. 32.1–32.11 (2013).)
CsurkaG.et al., “What is a good evaluation measure for semantic segmentation?” in Proc. Br. Mach. Vision Conf., pp. 32.1–32.11 (2013).CsurkaG.et al., “What is a good evaluation measure for semantic segmentation?” in Proc. Br. Mach. Vision Conf., pp. 32.1–32.11 (2013)., CsurkaG.et al., “What is a good evaluation measure for semantic segmentation?” in Proc. Br. Mach. Vision Conf., pp. 32.1–32.11 (2013).
(2016)
a validated alternative to the Gleason score,” Eur
(2016)
Deep learning for visual understanding
(GuoY.et al., “Deep learning for visual understanding: a review,” Neurocomputing 187, 27–48 (2016).NRCGEO0925-231210.1016/j.neucom.2015.09.116)
GuoY.et al., “Deep learning for visual understanding: a review,” Neurocomputing 187, 27–48 (2016).NRCGEO0925-231210.1016/j.neucom.2015.09.116GuoY.et al., “Deep learning for visual understanding: a review,” Neurocomputing 187, 27–48 (2016).NRCGEO0925-231210.1016/j.neucom.2015.09.116, GuoY.et al., “Deep learning for visual understanding: a review,” Neurocomputing 187, 27–48 (2016).NRCGEO0925-231210.1016/j.neucom.2015.09.116
A. Halevy, Peter Norvig, Fernando Pereira (2009)
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of DataIEEE Intelligent Systems, 24
(HalevyA.NorvigP.PereiraF., “The unreasonable effectiveness of data,” IEEE Intell. Syst. 24, 8–12 (2009).10.1109/MIS.2009.36)
HalevyA.NorvigP.PereiraF., “The unreasonable effectiveness of data,” IEEE Intell. Syst. 24, 8–12 (2009).10.1109/MIS.2009.36HalevyA.NorvigP.PereiraF., “The unreasonable effectiveness of data,” IEEE Intell. Syst. 24, 8–12 (2009).10.1109/MIS.2009.36, HalevyA.NorvigP.PereiraF., “The unreasonable effectiveness of data,” IEEE Intell. Syst. 24, 8–12 (2009).10.1109/MIS.2009.36
D. Gleason (1966)
Classification of prostatic carcinomas.Cancer chemotherapy reports, 50 3
(BultenW.et al., “Automated segmentation of epithelial tissue in prostatectomy slides using deep learning,” Proc. SPIE 10581, 105810S (2018).PSISDG0277-786X10.1117/12.2292872)
BultenW.et al., “Automated segmentation of epithelial tissue in prostatectomy slides using deep learning,” Proc. SPIE 10581, 105810S (2018).PSISDG0277-786X10.1117/12.2292872BultenW.et al., “Automated segmentation of epithelial tissue in prostatectomy slides using deep learning,” Proc. SPIE 10581, 105810S (2018).PSISDG0277-786X10.1117/12.2292872, BultenW.et al., “Automated segmentation of epithelial tissue in prostatectomy slides using deep learning,” Proc. SPIE 10581, 105810S (2018).PSISDG0277-786X10.1117/12.2292872
A. Khan, N. Rajpoot, D. Treanor, D. Magee (2014)
A Nonlinear Mapping Approach to Stain Normalization in Digital Histopathology Images Using Image-Specific Color DeconvolutionIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 61
(2009)
a review,” IEEE Rev
G. Csurka, Diane Larlus, F. Perronnin (2013)
What is a good evaluation measure for semantic segmentation?
(GleasonD., “Classification of prostatic carcinomas,” Cancer Chemother. Rep. 50, 125 (1966).5948714)
GleasonD., “Classification of prostatic carcinomas,” Cancer Chemother. Rep. 50, 125 (1966).5948714GleasonD., “Classification of prostatic carcinomas,” Cancer Chemother. Rep. 50, 125 (1966).5948714, GleasonD., “Classification of prostatic carcinomas,” Cancer Chemother. Rep. 50, 125 (1966).5948714
Jun Xu, X. Luo, Guanhao Wang, Hannah Gilmore, A. Madabhushi (2016)
A Deep Convolutional Neural Network for segmenting and classifying epithelial and stromal regions in histopathological imagesNeurocomputing, 191
Arkadiusz Gertych, N. Ing, Zhaoxuan Ma, Thomas Fuchs, S. Salman, S. Mohanty, S. Bhele, Adriana Velásquez-Vacca, M. Amin, B. Knudsen (2015)
Machine learning approaches to analyze histological images of tissues from radical prostatectomiesComputerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society, 46 Pt 2
(HurrellS. L.et al., “Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging,” J. Med. Imaging 5, 011004 (2018).JMEIET0920-549710.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011004)
HurrellS. L.et al., “Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging,” J. Med. Imaging 5, 011004 (2018).JMEIET0920-549710.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011004HurrellS. L.et al., “Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging,” J. Med. Imaging 5, 011004 (2018).JMEIET0920-549710.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011004, HurrellS. L.et al., “Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging,” J. Med. Imaging 5, 011004 (2018).JMEIET0920-549710.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011004
(SeragA.et al., “A multi-level deep learning algorithm to estimate tumor content and cellularity of prostate cancer” (2018).)
SeragA.et al., “A multi-level deep learning algorithm to estimate tumor content and cellularity of prostate cancer” (2018).SeragA.et al., “A multi-level deep learning algorithm to estimate tumor content and cellularity of prostate cancer” (2018)., SeragA.et al., “A multi-level deep learning algorithm to estimate tumor content and cellularity of prostate cancer” (2018).
L. Dice (1945)
Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between SpeciesEcology, 26
(RatnerA.et al., “Snorkel: rapid training data creation with weak supervision,” Proc. VLDB Endowment 11, 269–282 (2017).10.14778/3157794.3157797)
RatnerA.et al., “Snorkel: rapid training data creation with weak supervision,” Proc. VLDB Endowment 11, 269–282 (2017).10.14778/3157794.3157797RatnerA.et al., “Snorkel: rapid training data creation with weak supervision,” Proc. VLDB Endowment 11, 269–282 (2017).10.14778/3157794.3157797, RatnerA.et al., “Snorkel: rapid training data creation with weak supervision,” Proc. VLDB Endowment 11, 269–282 (2017).10.14778/3157794.3157797
(KhanA. M.et al., “A nonlinear mapping approach to stain normalization in digital histopathology images using image-specific color deconvolution,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 61, 1729–1738 (2014).IEBEAX0018-929410.1109/TBME.2014.230329424845283)
KhanA. M.et al., “A nonlinear mapping approach to stain normalization in digital histopathology images using image-specific color deconvolution,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 61, 1729–1738 (2014).IEBEAX0018-929410.1109/TBME.2014.230329424845283KhanA. M.et al., “A nonlinear mapping approach to stain normalization in digital histopathology images using image-specific color deconvolution,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 61, 1729–1738 (2014).IEBEAX0018-929410.1109/TBME.2014.230329424845283, KhanA. M.et al., “A nonlinear mapping approach to stain normalization in digital histopathology images using image-specific color deconvolution,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 61, 1729–1738 (2014).IEBEAX0018-929410.1109/TBME.2014.230329424845283
(GertychA.et al., “Machine learning approaches to analyze histological images of tissues from radical prostatectomies,” Comput. Med. Imaging Graphics 46, 197–208 (2015).10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.08.002)
GertychA.et al., “Machine learning approaches to analyze histological images of tissues from radical prostatectomies,” Comput. Med. Imaging Graphics 46, 197–208 (2015).10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.08.002GertychA.et al., “Machine learning approaches to analyze histological images of tissues from radical prostatectomies,” Comput. Med. Imaging Graphics 46, 197–208 (2015).10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.08.002, GertychA.et al., “Machine learning approaches to analyze histological images of tissues from radical prostatectomies,” Comput. Med. Imaging Graphics 46, 197–208 (2015).10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.08.002
S. McGarry, S.L. Hurrell, K. Iczkowski, W. Hall, Amy Kaczmarowski, A. Banerjee, Tucker Keuter, K. Jacobsohn, J. Bukowy, M. Nevalainen, Mark Hohenwalter, W. See, P. LaViolette (2018)
Radio-pathomic Maps of Epithelium and Lumen Density Predict the Location of High-Grade Prostate CancerInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 101
Evan Shelhamer, Jonathan Long, Trevor Darrell (2014)
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
(GurcanM. N.et al., “Histopathological image analysis: a review,” IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2, 147 (2009).10.1109/RBME.2009.203486520671804)
GurcanM. N.et al., “Histopathological image analysis: a review,” IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2, 147 (2009).10.1109/RBME.2009.203486520671804GurcanM. N.et al., “Histopathological image analysis: a review,” IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2, 147 (2009).10.1109/RBME.2009.203486520671804, GurcanM. N.et al., “Histopathological image analysis: a review,” IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2, 147 (2009).10.1109/RBME.2009.203486520671804
A. Serag, Peter Hamilton, P. Maxwell, P. O'Reilly (2018)
A multi-level deep learning algorithm to estimate tumor content and cellularity of prostate cancer
(SiegelR. L.MillerK. D.JemalA., “Cancer statistics, 2016,” CA Cancer J. Clin. 66, 7–30 (2016).10.3322/caac.2133226742998)
SiegelR. L.MillerK. D.JemalA., “Cancer statistics, 2016,” CA Cancer J. Clin. 66, 7–30 (2016).10.3322/caac.2133226742998SiegelR. L.MillerK. D.JemalA., “Cancer statistics, 2016,” CA Cancer J. Clin. 66, 7–30 (2016).10.3322/caac.2133226742998, SiegelR. L.MillerK. D.JemalA., “Cancer statistics, 2016,” CA Cancer J. Clin. 66, 7–30 (2016).10.3322/caac.2133226742998
Chen Sun, Abhinav Shrivastava, Saurabh Singh, A. Gupta (2017)
Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
(DelahuntB.SrigleyJ. R.LambD. S., “Gleason grading: consensus and controversy,” Pathology 41(7), 613–614 (2009).PTLGAX1465-393110.3109/0031302090330882320001338)
DelahuntB.SrigleyJ. R.LambD. S., “Gleason grading: consensus and controversy,” Pathology 41(7), 613–614 (2009).PTLGAX1465-393110.3109/0031302090330882320001338DelahuntB.SrigleyJ. R.LambD. S., “Gleason grading: consensus and controversy,” Pathology 41(7), 613–614 (2009).PTLGAX1465-393110.3109/0031302090330882320001338, DelahuntB.SrigleyJ. R.LambD. S., “Gleason grading: consensus and controversy,” Pathology 41(7), 613–614 (2009).PTLGAX1465-393110.3109/0031302090330882320001338
S. Naik, Scott Doyle, M. Feldman, John Tomaszewski, A. Madabhushi (2007)
Gland Segmentation and Computerized Gleason Grading of Prostate Histology by Integrating Low-, High-level and Domain Specific Information
(2015)
convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” Lect
(EpsteinJ. I., “An update of the Gleason grading system,” J. Urol. 183, 433–440 (2010).10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.04620006878)
EpsteinJ. I., “An update of the Gleason grading system,” J. Urol. 183, 433–440 (2010).10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.04620006878EpsteinJ. I., “An update of the Gleason grading system,” J. Urol. 183, 433–440 (2010).10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.04620006878, EpsteinJ. I., “An update of the Gleason grading system,” J. Urol. 183, 433–440 (2010).10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.04620006878
(SunC.et al., “Revisiting unreasonable effectiveness of data in deep learning era,” in IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vision, IEEE, pp. 843–852 (2017).10.1109/ICCV.2017.97)
SunC.et al., “Revisiting unreasonable effectiveness of data in deep learning era,” in IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vision, IEEE, pp. 843–852 (2017).10.1109/ICCV.2017.97SunC.et al., “Revisiting unreasonable effectiveness of data in deep learning era,” in IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vision, IEEE, pp. 843–852 (2017).10.1109/ICCV.2017.97, SunC.et al., “Revisiting unreasonable effectiveness of data in deep learning era,” in IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vision, IEEE, pp. 843–852 (2017).10.1109/ICCV.2017.97
(2009)
From Nano to Macro, IEEE, pp
S.L. Hurrell, S. McGarry, Amy Kaczmarowski, K. Iczkowski, K. Jacobsohn, Mark Hohenwalter, W. Hall, W. See, A. Banerjee, David Charles, M. Nevalainen, A. Mackinnon, P. LaViolette (2017)
Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imagingJournal of Medical Imaging, 5
R. Siegel, K. Miller, A. Jemal (2016)
Cancer statistics, 2016CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 66
Yanming Guo, Yu Liu, Ard Oerlemans, Songyang Lao, Song Wu, M. Lew (2016)
Deep learning for visual understanding: A reviewNeurocomputing, 187
(McGarryS. D.et al., “Radio-pathomic maps of epithelium and lumen density predict the location of high-grade prostate cancer,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 101(5), 1179–1187 (2018).IOBPD30360-301610.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.04429908785)
McGarryS. D.et al., “Radio-pathomic maps of epithelium and lumen density predict the location of high-grade prostate cancer,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 101(5), 1179–1187 (2018).IOBPD30360-301610.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.04429908785McGarryS. D.et al., “Radio-pathomic maps of epithelium and lumen density predict the location of high-grade prostate cancer,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 101(5), 1179–1187 (2018).IOBPD30360-301610.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.04429908785, McGarryS. D.et al., “Radio-pathomic maps of epithelium and lumen density predict the location of high-grade prostate cancer,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 101(5), 1179–1187 (2018).IOBPD30360-301610.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.04429908785
(2017)
a deep convolutional encoderdecoder architecture for image segmentation,” IEEE Trans
(NirG.et al., “Automatic grading of prostate cancer in digitized histopathology images: learning from multiple experts,” Med. Image Anal. 50, 167–180 (2018).10.1016/j.media.2018.09.00530340027)
NirG.et al., “Automatic grading of prostate cancer in digitized histopathology images: learning from multiple experts,” Med. Image Anal. 50, 167–180 (2018).10.1016/j.media.2018.09.00530340027NirG.et al., “Automatic grading of prostate cancer in digitized histopathology images: learning from multiple experts,” Med. Image Anal. 50, 167–180 (2018).10.1016/j.media.2018.09.00530340027, NirG.et al., “Automatic grading of prostate cancer in digitized histopathology images: learning from multiple experts,” Med. Image Anal. 50, 167–180 (2018).10.1016/j.media.2018.09.00530340027
(DiceL. R., “Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species,” Ecology 26, 297–302 (1945).ECGYAQ0094-662110.2307/1932409)
DiceL. R., “Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species,” Ecology 26, 297–302 (1945).ECGYAQ0094-662110.2307/1932409DiceL. R., “Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species,” Ecology 26, 297–302 (1945).ECGYAQ0094-662110.2307/1932409, DiceL. R., “Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species,” Ecology 26, 297–302 (1945).ECGYAQ0094-662110.2307/1932409
(EpsteinJ. I.et al., “A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: a validated alternative to the Gleason score,” Eur. Urol. 69, 428–435 (2016).EUURAV0302-283810.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.04626166626)
EpsteinJ. I.et al., “A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: a validated alternative to the Gleason score,” Eur. Urol. 69, 428–435 (2016).EUURAV0302-283810.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.04626166626EpsteinJ. I.et al., “A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: a validated alternative to the Gleason score,” Eur. Urol. 69, 428–435 (2016).EUURAV0302-283810.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.04626166626, EpsteinJ. I.et al., “A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: a validated alternative to the Gleason score,” Eur. Urol. 69, 428–435 (2016).EUURAV0302-283810.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.04626166626
Gabriele Campanella, M. Hanna, Luke Geneslaw, Allen Miraflor, Vitor Silva, K. Busam, E. Brogi, V. Reuter, D. Klimstra, Thomas Fuchs (2019)
Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide imagesNature Medicine, 25
B. Delahunt, J. Srigley, D. Lamb (2009)
Gleason grading: consensus and controversy.Pathology, 41 7
(MacenkoM.et al., “A method for normalizing histology slides for quantitative analysis,” IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imaging: From Nano to Macro, IEEE, pp. 1107–1110 (2009).10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193250)
MacenkoM.et al., “A method for normalizing histology slides for quantitative analysis,” IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imaging: From Nano to Macro, IEEE, pp. 1107–1110 (2009).10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193250MacenkoM.et al., “A method for normalizing histology slides for quantitative analysis,” IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imaging: From Nano to Macro, IEEE, pp. 1107–1110 (2009).10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193250, MacenkoM.et al., “A method for normalizing histology slides for quantitative analysis,” IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imaging: From Nano to Macro, IEEE, pp. 1107–1110 (2009).10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193250
J. Epstein (2010)
An update of the Gleason grading system.The Journal of urology, 183 2
Alexander Ratner, Stephen Bach, Henry Ehrenberg, Jason Fries, Sen Wu, C. Ré (2017)
Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak SupervisionProceedings of the VLDB Endowment. International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 11 3
(RonnebergerO.FischerP.BroxT., “U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 9351, 234–241 (2015).LNCSD90302-974310.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28)
RonnebergerO.FischerP.BroxT., “U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 9351, 234–241 (2015).LNCSD90302-974310.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28RonnebergerO.FischerP.BroxT., “U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 9351, 234–241 (2015).LNCSD90302-974310.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28, RonnebergerO.FischerP.BroxT., “U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 9351, 234–241 (2015).LNCSD90302-974310.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28
M. Gurcan, L. Boucheron, A. Can, A. Madabhushi, N. Rajpoot, B. Yener (2009)
Histopathological Image Analysis: A ReviewIEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 2
(SimonyanK.ZissermanA., “Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,” arXiv:14091556 (2014).)
SimonyanK.ZissermanA., “Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,” arXiv:14091556 (2014).SimonyanK.ZissermanA., “Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,” arXiv:14091556 (2014)., SimonyanK.ZissermanA., “Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,” arXiv:14091556 (2014).
(LongJ.ShelhamerE.DarrellT., “Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vision and Pattern Recognit., pp. 3431–3440 (2015).10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298965)
LongJ.ShelhamerE.DarrellT., “Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vision and Pattern Recognit., pp. 3431–3440 (2015).10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298965LongJ.ShelhamerE.DarrellT., “Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vision and Pattern Recognit., pp. 3431–3440 (2015).10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298965, LongJ.ShelhamerE.DarrellT., “Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vision and Pattern Recognit., pp. 3431–3440 (2015).10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298965
Vijay Badrinarayanan, Alex Kendall, R. Cipolla (2015)
SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image SegmentationIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 39
(CampanellaG.et al., “Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images,” Nat. Med. 25, 1301–1309 (2019).1078-895610.1038/s41591-019-0508-131308507)
CampanellaG.et al., “Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images,” Nat. Med. 25, 1301–1309 (2019).1078-895610.1038/s41591-019-0508-131308507CampanellaG.et al., “Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images,” Nat. Med. 25, 1301–1309 (2019).1078-895610.1038/s41591-019-0508-131308507, CampanellaG.et al., “Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images,” Nat. Med. 25, 1301–1309 (2019).1078-895610.1038/s41591-019-0508-131308507
G. Nir, S. Hor, D. Karimi, L. Fazli, B. Skinnider, P. Tavassoli, D. Turbin, Carlos Villamil, G. Wang, R. Wilson, K. Iczkowski, M. Lucia, P. Black, P. Abolmaesumi, S. Goldenberg, S. Salcudean (2018)
Automatic grading of prostate cancer in digitized histopathology images: Learning from multiple expertsMedical Image Analysis, 50
Abstract.Purpose: Prostate cancer primarily arises from the glandular epithelium. Histomophometric techniques have been used to assess the glandular epithelium in automated detection and classification pipelines; however, they are often rigid in their implementation, and their performance suffers on large datasets where variation in staining, imaging, and preparation is difficult to control. The purpose of this study is to quantify performance of a pixelwise segmentation algorithm that was trained using different combinations of weak and strong stroma, epithelium, and lumen labels in a prostate histology dataset.Approach: We have combined weakly labeled datasets generated using simple morphometric techniques and high-quality labeled datasets from human observers in prostate biopsy cores to train a convolutional neural network for use in whole mount prostate labeling pipelines. With trained networks, we characterize pixelwise segmentation of stromal, epithelium, and lumen (SEL) regions on both biopsy core and whole-mount H&E-stained tissue.Results: We provide evidence that by simply training a deep learning algorithm on weakly labeled data generated from rigid morphometric methods, we can improve the robustness of classification over the morphometric methods used to train the classifier.Conclusions: We show that not only does our approach of combining weak and strong labels for training the CNN improve qualitative SEL labeling within tissue but also the deep learning generated labels are superior for cancer classification in a higher-order algorithm over the morphometrically derived labels it was trained on.
Journal of Medical Imaging – SPIE
Published: Sep 1, 2020
Keywords: prostate cancer; deep learning; machine learning; histology; epithelium; segmentation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.