Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Subsequently to the publication of the above article, the authors have realized that Fig. 5B on p. 8 was compiled erroneously, in the sense that the two immunohistochemical images selected for Fig 5B did not correspond to each other, meaning they were not derived from the same field under the microscope. This error was inadvertently made during the preparation of the manuscript. A corrected version of Fig. 5, showing the correct data for the expression of PKM2 in NAT in Fig. 5B, is shown on the next page. This inadvertent error did not affect the conclusions reported in this paper, and all the authors agree with this Corrigendum. The authors sincerely thank the Editor of <em>Oncology Reports</em> for presenting them with the opportunity to publish this Corrigendum, and apologize to the readership of the journal for any inconvenience caused. [the original article was published in <em>Oncology Reports</em> 46: Article no. 216, 2021; DOI: 10.3892/or.2021.8167]
Oncology Reports – Spandidos Publications
Published: Mar 22, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.