Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Alexandru Grigorescu (2003)
International Organizations and Government Transparency: Linking the International and Domestic RealmsInternational Studies Quarterly, 47
Henry Perritt, Zachary Rustad (2000)
Freedom of information spreads to EuropeGov. Inf. Q., 17
K. Allan, I. Currie (2007)
Enforcing Access to Information and Privacy Rights: Evaluating Proposals for an Information Protection Regulator for South AfricaSouth African Journal on Human Rights, 23
Colin Bennett (1997)
Understanding Ripple Effects: The Cross–National Adoption of Policy Instruments for Bureaucratic AccountabilityGovernance, 10
M. Bovens (2007)
Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual FrameworkWiley-Blackwell: European Law Journal
B. Worthy (2010)
More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central GovernmentGovernance, 23
R. Hazell, B. Worthy, M. Glover (2010)
The impact of the Freedom of Information Act on central government in the UK: does freedom of information work?
S. Piotrowski, Gregg Ryzin (2007)
Citizen Attitudes Toward Transparency in Local GovernmentThe American Review of Public Administration, 37
Hiroshi Fukurai, Clark Knudtson, Susan Lopez (2010)
Is Mexico Ready for a Jury Trial?: Comparative Analysis of Lay Justice Systems in Mexico, the United States, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, and IrelandMexican law review, 1
Thomas Blanton (2002)
The World's Right to KnowForeign Policy
M. Levi, L. Stoker (2000)
Political Trust and TrustworthinessAnnual Review of Political Science, 3
Shekhar Singh (2007)
Chapter One. India. Grassroots Initiatives
B. Cain, P. Egan, Sergio Fabbrini (2003)
Towards More Open Democracies: The Expansion of Freedom of Information Laws
More than 80 access to information (ATI) laws exist worldwide. Their primary objectives are to increase transparency and accountability in government. Given the similarity in the components of ATI laws across countries, one could expect per capita usage of the laws to be roughly similar. However, comparing the number of requests in seven countries, we found that far fewer requests are being made in Switzerland and Germany than in Canada, Ireland, Mexico, India, and the UK and that, in contrast to these five, the number is not increasing. Drawing on 28 semi-structured interviews with experts on the Swiss Law on Transparency (LTrans) and German FOI Law (IFG), we offer three primary explanations for the low use of the laws. The first is that few people are aware of the law in either country as a consequence of little promotion of the laws. The second is that people might have more interest in information held at the state or local level than at the federal level. The third is that other avenues to information in Switzerland reduce interest in using the LTrans and a culture of “amtsgeheimnis”, or official secrecy, in Germany inhibits the administration from willingly disclosing information. We examine these hypotheses against the situation in the UK, where awareness of the FOI law is known to be high and the number of requests is high and has been on the rise for the past four years.
Public Policy and Administration – SAGE
Published: Oct 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.