Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Bandura, C. Kupers (1964)
TRANSMISSION OF PATTERNS OF SELF-REINFORCEMENT THROUGH MODELING.Journal of abnormal psychology, 69
A. Bandura, W. Mischel (1965)
Modification of self-imposed delay of reward through exposure to live and symbolic models.Journal of personality and social psychology, 2 5
Title: Research Coordinator
(1970)
Children's Television Workshop. First reports from the field: utilization's 1971 model
S. Dornbusch, I. Pool (1960)
Trends in content analysisAmerican Journal of Psychology, 73
A. Bandura, T. Rosenthal (1966)
Vicarious classical conditioning as a function of arousal level.Journal of personality and social psychology, 3 1
A. Bandura (1965)
Vicarious Processes: A Case of No-Trial Learning1Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2
(1965)
Nonverbal communication: Explorations into time, space, action, and object
A. Bandura, F. Mcdonald (1963)
INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL REINFORCEMENT AND THE BEHAVIOR OF MODELS IN SHAPING CHILDREN'S MORAL JUDGMENTS.Journal of abnormal psychology, 67
A. Bandura, C. Whalen (1966)
The influence of antecedent reinforcement and divergent modeling cues on patterns of self-reward.Journal of personality and social psychology, 3 4
S. Ball, G. Bogatz (1970)
A Summary of the Major Findings in "The First Year of Sesame Street: An Evaluation".
A. Bandura, D. Ross, S. Ross (1963)
Imitation of film-mediated agressive models.Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 66
A. Bandura, J. Grusec, F. Menlove (1967)
Some social determinants of self-monitoring reinforcement systems.Journal of personality and social psychology, 5 4
(1971)
What's around the corner for "Sesame Street
B. Groombridge (1965)
The Effects of Mass CommunicationMental Health, 24
Thirty prekindergarten children, randomly assigned, were videotaped while viewing the same pre-taped Sesame Street program either as single viewers (N=6) or as group viewers (6 groups of 4 Ss each). Video-tapes were systematically coded for visual attention, modeling behaviors, and other meta-communication. Both groups and single viewers averaged eye contact with over 80% of the program despite exhibiting more than one nonviewing behavior per minute and high mobility while viewing. Group viewers exhibited a large number and variety of verbal and nonverbal, targeted and (probably) nontargeted modeling behaviors; single viewers much fewer. Overt program-elicited amusement was more frequent for groups than for singles. Children exhibited vicarious participation as evidenced by one direct reaction to the program about every four minutes. Other behaviors included (a) labeling (b) program appeal behaviors, (c) associating, (d) fear references, (e) evaluating, (f) reading, (g) predicting, and (h) nonprogram related verbalization.
American Educational Research Journal – SAGE
Published: Nov 23, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.