Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Keith, M. Tito, Janis Demetruuas, A. Driedger, F. John, T. Gregory, B. Kong, W. Mccormick, H. North-Root, G. Michael, I. Richard (1988)
In vitro methods for estimating eye irritancy of cleaning products phase i: preliminary assessmentJournal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology, 7
W. Halle, E. Göres (1987)
Vorhersage von LD50-Werten mit der ZellkulturPharmazie, 42
V. Gordon, C. Kelly, H. Bergman (1990)
Applications of the EYTEX method.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA, 4 4-5
B. Ekwall (2009)
Correlation between cytotoxicity in vitro and LD50-values.Acta pharmacologica et toxicologica, 52 Suppl 2
A. Keith, John Prospo, J. Demetrulias, A. Driedger, F. John, Gregory Grochoski, B. Kong, W. Mccormick, H. North-Root, G. Michael, I. Richard (1989)
The sda alternatives program: comparison of In Vitro Data with draize test dataJournal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology, 8
R. Clothier, Hulme Lm, M. Smith, M. Balls (1987)
Comparison of the in vitro cytotoxicities and acute in vivo toxicities of 59 chemicals.Molecular toxicology, 1 4
H. Spielmann, I. Gerner, S. Kalweit, R. Moog, T. Wirnsberger, K. Krauser, R. Kreiling, H. Kreuzer, N. Lüpke, H. Miltenburger, N. Müller, P. Mürmann, W. Pape, B. Siegemund, J. Spengler, W. Steiling, F. Wiebel (1991)
Interlaboratory assessment of alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test in Germany.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA, 5 5-6
B. Ekwall, Christina Nordensten, Lennart Albanus (1982)
Toxicity of 29 plasticizers to HeLa cells in the MIT-24 system.Toxicology, 24 3-4
S. Rosenbluth, G. Weddington, W. Guess, J. Autian (1965)
TISSUE CULTURE METHOD FOR SCREENING TOXICITY OF PLASTIC MATERIALS TO BE USED IN MEDICAL PRACTICE.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 54
B. Ekwall, D. Acosta (1982)
In vitro comparative toxicity of selected drugs and chemicals in HeLa cells, Chang liver cells, and rat hepatocytes.Drug and chemical toxicology, 5 3
J. Fry, M. Garle, A. Hammond, A. Hatfield (1990)
Correlation of acute lethal potency with in vitro cytotoxicity.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA, 4 3
O. Blein, M. Adolphe, B. Lakhdar, J. Cambar, G. Gubanski, D. Castelli, C. Contie, F. Hubert, F. Latrille, P. Masson, J. Clouzeau, J. Bigot, O. Silva, K. Dossou (1991)
Correlation and validation of alternative methods to the Draize eye irritation test (OPAL project).Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA, 5 5-6
E. Walum, A. Peterson (1984)
On the application of cultured neuroblastoma cells in chemical toxicity screening.Journal of toxicology and environmental health, 13 4-6
M. Balls, R. Clothier (1987)
Validation of alternative toxicity test systems: lessons learned and to be learned.Molecular toxicology, 1 4
B. Ekwall (1983)
SCREENING OF TOXIC COMPOUNDS IN MAMMALIAN CELL CULTURESAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 407
John Autian, Wallace Guess (1973)
The new field of plastics toxicology--methods and results.CRC critical reviews in toxicology, 2 1
R. Wilsnack (1976)
Quantitative cell culture biocompatibility testing of medical devices and correlation to animal tests.Biomaterials, medical devices, and artificial organs, 4 3-4
R. Clothier, M. Balls (1990)
Validation of alternative toxicity tests: Principles, practices and cases.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA, 4 4-5
In recent years, conventional toxicity testing in animals has been reinforced by in vitro methods. As a result, toxicity testing in some sectors has become more effective and at the same time more ethical. This trend is probably only at its beginning, as many of the newly-developed methods have not yet won general acceptance as a basis for the large-scale replacement and reduction of animal experimentation. What limits the wider use of these methods is validation, i.e. the evaluation of their reliability and relevance. The present paper is a short review of the validation efforts made hitherto, including projects being planned and under discussion. Our own MEIC approach is compared with other strategies. Finally, our opinion on the effectiveness of one large consensus project relative to several different smaller validation programmes is expressed — we advocate the latter strategy, because it will save time and reduce costs.
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals – SAGE
Published: Apr 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.