Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Martin, A. Donaldson, R. Villarroel, Mahesh Parmar, E. Ernst, I. Higginson (2002)
Efficacy of acupuncture in asthma: systematic review and meta-analysis of published data from 11 randomised controlled trialsEuropean Respiratory Journal, 20
D. Cook, C. Mulrow, R. Haynes (1997)
Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical DecisionsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 126
H. Langevin, R. Schnyer, H. MacPherson, R. Davis, Richard Harris, V. Napadow, P. Wayne, Ryan Milley, L. Lao, E. Stener-Victorin, J. Kong, R. Hammerschlag (2015)
Manual and electrical needle stimulation in acupuncture research: pitfalls and challenges of heterogeneity.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine, 21 3
A. Liberati, Douglas Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P. Gøtzsche, John Ioannidis, Mike Clarke, P. Devereaux, Jos Kleijnen (2009)
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions : Explanation and Elaboration
J. Higgins, D. Altman, P. Gøtzsche, P. Jüni, D. Moher, A. Oxman, J. Savović, K. Schulz, L. Weeks, J. Sterne (2011)
The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsThe BMJ, 343
Cheong Bik, Jiping Zhang, H. Yong (2016)
[Effectiveness of acupuncture in postoperative ileus: a systematic review and Meta-analysis].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 36
Guangtian Zhang, W. Fu, Nenggui Xu, Jian-hua Liu, Xiao-ping Zhu, Zhao-hui Liang, Ye-fei Huang, Yuanfang Chen (2012)
Meta analysis of the curative effect of acupuncture on post-stroke depression.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan, 32 1
L. Hartling, M. Ospina, Yuan-yuan Liang, D. Dryden, N. Hooton, Jennifer Seida, T. Klassen (2009)
Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional studyThe BMJ, 339
A. Hrõbjartsson, I. Boutron, Lucy Turner, D. Altman, D. Moher (2013)
Assessing risk of bias in randomised clinical trials included in Cochrane Reviews: the why is easy, the how is a challenge.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 4
Huan Yang, Cun-Zhi Liu, Xu Chen, Liangxiao Ma, Jie-ping Xie, Nan-nan Guo, Zeng-Bin Ma, Yuan-Yuan Zheng, Jiang Zhu, Jian-ping Liu (2008)
Systematic review of clinical trials of acupuncture‐related therapies for primary dysmenorrheaActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 87
P. Jüni, A. Witschi, R. Bloch, M. Egger (1999)
The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis.JAMA, 282 11
Julian Higgins, Sally Green (2010)
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of InterventionsInternational Coaching Psychology Review
K. Cheong, Jiping Zhang, Yong Huang, Zhang-Jin Zhang (2013)
The Effectiveness of Acupuncture in Prevention and Treatment of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisPLoS ONE, 8
B. Speich (2017)
Blinding in Surgical Randomized Clinical Trials in 2015Annals of Surgery, 266
J. Higgins, S. Green, J. Higgins (2013)
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration
Hong-wei1 Guo, Ge Li, Su Chen, Tao Yu (2018)
[Quality of methodology and reporting of Meta-analyses on acupuncture treating ischemic stroke in China].Zhongguo zhen jiu = Chinese acupuncture & moxibustion, 38 11
S. Hopewell, I. Boutron, D. Altman, P. Ravaud (2013)
Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional studyBMJ Open, 3
K. Cheong, Jiping Zhang, Yong Huang (2014)
The effectiveness of acupuncture in postoperative gastroparesis syndrome--a systematic review and meta-analysis.Complementary therapies in medicine, 22 4
A. Dechartres, Pierre Charles, S. Hopewell, P. Ravaud, D. Altman (2011)
Reviews assessing the quality or the reporting of randomized controlled trials are increasing over time but raised questions about how quality is assessed.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 64 2
K. Pussegoda, Lucy Turner, C. Garritty, A. Mayhew, B. Skidmore, A. Stevens, I. Boutron, R. Sarkis-Onofre, L. Bjerre, A. Hrõbjartsson, D. Altman, D. Moher (2017)
University of Southern Denmark Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
A. Dechartres, L. Trinquart, Ignacio Atal, D. Moher, K. Dickersin, I. Boutron, É. Perrodeau, D. Altman, P. Ravaud (2017)
Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research studyBritish Medical Journal, 357
K. Cheong, Jiping Zhang, Yong Huang (2016)
[Effectiveness of acupuncture in postoperative ileus: a systematic review and Meta-analysis].Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan, 36 3
Ya-li Liu, R. Zhang, Jiao Huang, Xu Zhao, Danlu Liu, Wanting Sun, Yuefen Mai, P. Zhang, Ya-jie Wang, Hua Cao, Ke-hu Yang (2014)
Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of AcupuncturePLoS ONE, 9
R. Clark, M. Tighe (2012)
The Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Plantar Heel Pain: A Systematic ReviewAcupuncture in Medicine, 30
Ya-li Liu, Shengping Yang, Junjie Dai, Yongteng Xu, R. Zhang, Huaili Jiang, Xianxia Yan, Kehu Yang (2011)
Risk of Bias Tool in Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture in Chinese JournalsPLoS ONE, 6
Xiuxia Li, Rong Wang, Xiue Shi, Jinlong Su, Yuanqing Pan, Jinhui Tian, Kehu Yang (2017)
Reporting Characteristics and Quality of Systematic Reviews of Acupuncture AnalgesiaPain Practice, 17
Objective:To assess the use and reporting of risk of bias (RoB) tools in systematic reviews (SRs) of acupuncture.Study design and setting:We extracted and analyzed information relating to RoB in acupuncture SRs via Medline, Embase and the Chinese CNKI (Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure), WanFang and VIP databases from their inception to 24 November 2017. Three subgroup analyses were used to check the influence of language, journal type and impact factor, following which we used descriptive analysis.Results:We included 825 acupuncture SRs, of which 48% used the Cochrane RoB tool. Only 36% used the latest version of the Cochrane Handbook (version 5.1.0 at time of writing) with higher proportions among Cochrane SRs (65%) versus non-Cochrane SRs (34%), and high impact factor journals (58%) versus low or no impact factor journals (28% and 38%, respectively). In the last decade, there were notable increases in the use of the Cochrane RoB tool and Cochrane Handbook version 5.1.0, of 43% and 19%, respectively. Chinese-language SRs demonstrated proportionally higher tendencies to report an incorrect Cochrane Handbook version, increasing by 14% in the last 5 years. Additionally, 7% SRs did not report any results, and only 10% reported relatively complete and adequate RoB assessment. Cochrane SRs reported more complete assessments than Chinese-language or non-Cochrane English-language SRs.Conclusion:Use and reporting of RoB tools were suboptimal. Proportionally, use of the Cochrane RoB tool and Cochrane Handbook version 5.1.0 was low but rising. Our results highlight the prevalence and concerns of using unsuitable tools and the issue of incomplete RoB reporting. RoB tool application requires further improvement.
Acupuncture in Medicine – SAGE
Published: Aug 1, 2021
Keywords: acupuncture,meta-analysis,methodological quality,reporting,risk of bias,systematic review
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.