Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Training for Reduction in Laboratory Animal Use

Training for Reduction in Laboratory Animal Use Reduction, refinement and replacement of laboratory animals wherever possible, are the guiding principles of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA) education guidelines. Of these, reduction is probably the least understood. Reduction and refinement are dependent upon each other. In the reduction “axis”, there is a window of appropriate numbers of animals; too few and the experiment will lack power — too many and animals will be wasted. Reduction must be understood as the appropriate number of animals required for each experiment. The refinement “axis” is more straightforward. Better welfare is always desirable. Any factor can interfere with a study in two ways. If it changes the mean, this may not be serious, because it should do so in all groups. If it causes a change in variation, then this is far more troublesome, because this is bound to alter the appropriate number of animals for an experiment. Scientists are definitely concerned about the variation of the characters that they are working with. It is obvious that changes in variation may be study-specific, which makes the formulation of overall guidelines difficult. Indeed, instead of trying to assess the impact of housing and procedures on every possible character, it could be more productive to look at the effects of welfare indicators on variation, with the understanding that low variation here is likely to be reflected by low variation in most other characters, while aiming to achieve the most uniform welfare of the animals in the study. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Alternatives to Laboratory Animals SAGE

Training for Reduction in Laboratory Animal Use

Nevalainen, Timo
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals , Volume 32 (2_suppl): 3 – Sep 1, 2004
Download PDF
3 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/training-for-reduction-in-laboratory-animal-use-lrZBRCE4xQ

References (4)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 2004 Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments
ISSN
0261-1929
eISSN
2632-3559
DOI
10.1177/026119290403202s13
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Reduction, refinement and replacement of laboratory animals wherever possible, are the guiding principles of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA) education guidelines. Of these, reduction is probably the least understood. Reduction and refinement are dependent upon each other. In the reduction “axis”, there is a window of appropriate numbers of animals; too few and the experiment will lack power — too many and animals will be wasted. Reduction must be understood as the appropriate number of animals required for each experiment. The refinement “axis” is more straightforward. Better welfare is always desirable. Any factor can interfere with a study in two ways. If it changes the mean, this may not be serious, because it should do so in all groups. If it causes a change in variation, then this is far more troublesome, because this is bound to alter the appropriate number of animals for an experiment. Scientists are definitely concerned about the variation of the characters that they are working with. It is obvious that changes in variation may be study-specific, which makes the formulation of overall guidelines difficult. Indeed, instead of trying to assess the impact of housing and procedures on every possible character, it could be more productive to look at the effects of welfare indicators on variation, with the understanding that low variation here is likely to be reflected by low variation in most other characters, while aiming to achieve the most uniform welfare of the animals in the study.

Journal

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals – SAGE

Published: Sep 1, 2004

There are no references for this article.