Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Timeliness in Notification of Critical Vascular Laboratory Test Results is Part of Quality Assurance

Timeliness in Notification of Critical Vascular Laboratory Test Results is Part of Quality Assurance IntroductionRegulatory and accrediting bodies, including Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of Vascular Laboratories, require a policy for timely notification of caregivers with potentially life-threatening or “critical” findings on vascular laboratory (VL) testing. However, the timeliness of notification with reference to VL tests is often not specified.ObjectiveTo audit all “critical” results as defined by our written policy requiring notification within 120 minutes of completion of a test.MethodsThe VL database, when queried for results between August 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009, showed that “critical” results constituted 6.1% (988/16,168) of all VL tests performed during that period. Reporting time was the time between test completion and contact with an appropriate caregiver. The type of test, indication, in or out-patient status, and after-hour or regular work hours testing was recorded during a separate focused audit.ResultsA focused audit performed during December 2009 showed 3.49% (31/888) of all tests reported as critical. The majority of critical results were abnormal venous studies (93.5%), performed in inpatients (61%), and during regular working hours (93.5%). The time to notification was a mean of 11.92 minutes (SD 9.51; range, 1–40 minutes).ConclusionsPromptness of notification of “critical” VL results to caregivers must be part of an audit quality assurance program. A well-established protocol for communication and documentation of critical results must be instituted in all VLs. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal for Vascular Ultrasound SAGE

Timeliness in Notification of Critical Vascular Laboratory Test Results is Part of Quality Assurance

Satiani, Bhagwan; Kiser, Dennis
Journal for Vascular Ultrasound , Volume 34 (4): 3 – Dec 1, 2010
Download PDF
3 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/timeliness-in-notification-of-critical-vascular-laboratory-test-rZcpIn018k

References (5)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 2010 Society for Vascular Ultrasound
ISSN
1544-3167
eISSN
1544-3175
DOI
10.1177/154431671003400404
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

IntroductionRegulatory and accrediting bodies, including Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of Vascular Laboratories, require a policy for timely notification of caregivers with potentially life-threatening or “critical” findings on vascular laboratory (VL) testing. However, the timeliness of notification with reference to VL tests is often not specified.ObjectiveTo audit all “critical” results as defined by our written policy requiring notification within 120 minutes of completion of a test.MethodsThe VL database, when queried for results between August 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009, showed that “critical” results constituted 6.1% (988/16,168) of all VL tests performed during that period. Reporting time was the time between test completion and contact with an appropriate caregiver. The type of test, indication, in or out-patient status, and after-hour or regular work hours testing was recorded during a separate focused audit.ResultsA focused audit performed during December 2009 showed 3.49% (31/888) of all tests reported as critical. The majority of critical results were abnormal venous studies (93.5%), performed in inpatients (61%), and during regular working hours (93.5%). The time to notification was a mean of 11.92 minutes (SD 9.51; range, 1–40 minutes).ConclusionsPromptness of notification of “critical” VL results to caregivers must be part of an audit quality assurance program. A well-established protocol for communication and documentation of critical results must be instituted in all VLs.

Journal

Journal for Vascular Ultrasound – SAGE

Published: Dec 1, 2010

There are no references for this article.