Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The (un)intended effects of street-level bureaucrats’ enforcement style: Do citizens shame or obey bureaucrats?:

The (un)intended effects of street-level bureaucrats’ enforcement style: Do citizens shame or... This paper studies the intended and unintended effects of street-level bureaucrats’ enforcement style. More specifically, it answers to what extent street-level bureaucrats’ enforcement style affects citizens’ obedience (i.e. intended effect) during face-to-face encounters and willingness to publicly shame bureaucrats (i.e. unintended effect). Building on insights from street-level enforcement and the social interactionist theory of coercive actions, a trade-off is theorized between the effect of enforcement style on citizens’ on-the-spot obedience and on public shaming. Results of an experiment (n = 318) and replication (n = 311) in The Netherlands reveal that (1) neither the legal nor facilitation dimension has an effect on on-the-spot obedience; (2) the legal dimension does not affect public shaming but (3) the facilitation decreases it. These findings are robust across both the experiment and replication. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Public Policy and Administration SAGE

The (un)intended effects of street-level bureaucrats’ enforcement style: Do citizens shame or obey bureaucrats?:

Public Policy and Administration , Volume 36 (4): 24 – Feb 26, 2020

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/the-un-intended-effects-of-street-level-bureaucrats-enforcement-style-Jjpu18Ikey

References (84)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 by SAGE Publications and PAC
ISSN
0952-0767
eISSN
1749-4192
DOI
10.1177/0952076720905005
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper studies the intended and unintended effects of street-level bureaucrats’ enforcement style. More specifically, it answers to what extent street-level bureaucrats’ enforcement style affects citizens’ obedience (i.e. intended effect) during face-to-face encounters and willingness to publicly shame bureaucrats (i.e. unintended effect). Building on insights from street-level enforcement and the social interactionist theory of coercive actions, a trade-off is theorized between the effect of enforcement style on citizens’ on-the-spot obedience and on public shaming. Results of an experiment (n = 318) and replication (n = 311) in The Netherlands reveal that (1) neither the legal nor facilitation dimension has an effect on on-the-spot obedience; (2) the legal dimension does not affect public shaming but (3) the facilitation decreases it. These findings are robust across both the experiment and replication.

Journal

Public Policy and AdministrationSAGE

Published: Feb 26, 2020

Keywords: Enforcement style; experiments; obedience; public shaming; street-level bureaucracy

There are no references for this article.