Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Three Rs and Animal Experimentation — Documented Signs of Advancement, or of Stagnation?

The Three Rs and Animal Experimentation — Documented Signs of Advancement, or of Stagnation? ATLA 39, 299–301, 2011 299 Editorial The Three Rs and Animal Experimentation — Documented Signs of Advancement, or of Stagnation? I am writing this on the last day of the 8th World Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), the Medical Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Research Council (MRC) and the Wellcome Trust, Life Sciences. However, rather than being in in response to a recommendation in the earlier Montreal among friends, with a glowing feeling Weatherall Report that the major funding bodies that sound Three Rs-based progress is being made should undertake a review of the outcome of all throughout the world, I am at home, being stared their work involving NHPs. Given its provenance, at by a number of documents, which suggest that it would have been unwise to expect very much of the good news from Montreal reflects what is hap- this report. It does concede that the funding bodies pening in some kind of parallel universe, light- should be more demanding of those who receive years away from the reality of biomedical science their funding, since it concludes that about one in as it is practised in the UK. 10 projects provides no clear scientific, medical http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Alternatives to Laboratory Animals SAGE

The Three Rs and Animal Experimentation — Documented Signs of Advancement, or of Stagnation?

Balls, Michael
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals , Volume 39 (4): 3 – Sep 1, 2011
Download PDF
3 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/the-three-rs-and-animal-experimentation-documented-signs-of-XHpox0HJKK

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 2011 Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments
ISSN
0261-1929
eISSN
2632-3559
DOI
10.1177/026119291103900405
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ATLA 39, 299–301, 2011 299 Editorial The Three Rs and Animal Experimentation — Documented Signs of Advancement, or of Stagnation? I am writing this on the last day of the 8th World Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), the Medical Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Research Council (MRC) and the Wellcome Trust, Life Sciences. However, rather than being in in response to a recommendation in the earlier Montreal among friends, with a glowing feeling Weatherall Report that the major funding bodies that sound Three Rs-based progress is being made should undertake a review of the outcome of all throughout the world, I am at home, being stared their work involving NHPs. Given its provenance, at by a number of documents, which suggest that it would have been unwise to expect very much of the good news from Montreal reflects what is hap- this report. It does concede that the funding bodies pening in some kind of parallel universe, light- should be more demanding of those who receive years away from the reality of biomedical science their funding, since it concludes that about one in as it is practised in the UK. 10 projects provides no clear scientific, medical

Journal

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals – SAGE

Published: Sep 1, 2011

There are no references for this article.