Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/sage/the-supreme-court-and-women-s-rights-a-new-challenge-hE7lP25U0a
References (29)
-
J. Yoo, T. Peretti, D. Yalof (2000)
Choosing Justices: A Political Appointments Process and the Wages of Judicial SupremacyMichigan Law Review, 98
-
Richard Levy (2000)
Federalism: The Next Generation -
(2000)
Has the hour of democracy come round at last? The new critique of judicial review -
is an assistant professor at the School of Social Work, Columbia University, 505 McVickar Hall, 622 West 113th Street -
(1991)
Civil rights legislation in the 1990s: When Congress overrules the Court -
H. Schwartz (2001)
The Supreme Court's Federalism: Fig Leaf for ConservativesThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 574
-
(2001)
Liberal-conservative self identification 1972-2000 -
Federal offense: The Court's assault on anti-discrimination -
T. Nelson (1996)
Violence against women.World watch, 9 4
-
White House ends Bar Association's role in screening federal judges -
V. Lens (2001)
The Supreme Court, Federalism, and Social Policy: The New Judicial ActivismSocial Service Review, 75
-
American's faith in the Supreme Court and in the Constitution: A new survey shows Bush v. Gore's effect was limited -
Gerald Rosenberg (1994)
The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model, 4
-
(1999)
Not guilty: The news media in the Supreme Court confirmation process -
M. Reisch (2000)
Social workers and politics in the new century.Social work, 45 4
-
L. Kramer (2000)
Putting the Politics Back into the Political Safeguards of FederalismColumbia Law Review, 100
-
(2000)
United States v. Morrison, 120 S.Ct -
(1999)
State of Vermont, 744 Ad. 2d -
(1954)
State health laws create arena for abortion battle -
F. Romero (2000)
The supreme court and the protection of minority rights: An empirical examination of racial discrimination casesLaw & Society Review, 34
-
(1992)
New York permits gender violence victims to sue. NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund. Retrieved from www.womensenews.org Planned Parenthood v -
Gerald Rosenberg (1992)
The hollow hope : can courts bring about social change?Contemporary Sociology, 21
-
Brett Mcdonnell (1997)
Dynamic statutory interpretations and sluggish social movementsCalifornia Law Review, 85
-
Michael Gerhardt (2002)
Supreme Court Selection as War -
Gregory Caldeira, J. Wright (1988)
Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme CourtAmerican Political Science Review, 82
-
Court battle for presidency rages on in legal circles -
Stephen Gottlieb (2000)
Morality Imposed: The Rehnquist Court and Liberty in America -
S. Goldman (2002)
Pursuit of Justices: Presidential Politics and the Selection of Supreme Court Nominees. By David Alistair Yalof. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999, 280p. $27.50.American Political Science Review, 96
-
(1989)
106-556, 108 Stat. 1941. Webster v. Reproductive Health
- Publisher
- SAGE
- Copyright
- Copyright © by SAGE Publications
- ISSN
- 0886-1099
- eISSN
- 1552-3020
- DOI
- 10.1177/0886109903018002003
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This article examines the conservative activism of the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Rehnquist. Suggestions are made on how advocates, including social workers and their professional organizations, can advance the cause of social justice for women, given the current parameters of the Supreme Court. Strategies include shifting attention to other arenas, including federal and state legislatures and state courts; diluting the effects of the Court by delegitimating its decisions; and influencing the future composition of the Court.
Journal
Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work – SAGE
Published: May 1, 2003