Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1974)
On the mathematical bases of the general correlation index: Rejoinder to Miller
John Miller, S. Farr (1971)
Bimultivariate Redundancy: A Comprehensive Measure of Interbattery RelationshipMultivariate Behavioral Research, 6
K. Crittenden, J. Norr (1973)
Student Values and Teacher Evaluation: A Problem in Person Perception, 36
John Miller (1975)
In defense of the general canonical correlation index: Reply to Nicewander and Wood.Psychological Bulletin, 82
F. Costin, W. Greenough, R. Menges (1971)
Student Ratings of College Teaching: Reliability, Validity, and UsefulnessReview of Educational Research, 41
P. Warr, C. Knapper (1971)
The perception of people and events
J. Elashoff, F. Kerlinger, E. Pedhazur (1974)
Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70
(1971)
Tetenbaum, T. Student needs, teacher orientations and student ratings of teachers
A. Rezler (1965)
The Influence of Needs upon the Student’s Perception of His InstructorJournal of Educational Research, 58
E. Miller (1946)
Handbook of Social PsychologyMental Health, 6
D. Stewart, W. Love (1968)
A general canonical correlation index.Psychological bulletin, 70 3
W. Nicewander, D. Wood (1974)
Comments on "A general canonical correlation index."Psychological Bulletin, 81
Daniel Katz (1955)
Handbook of Social Psychology.Psychological Bulletin
(1973)
Research on teaching in higher education
(1967)
Manual for the Personality Research Form
W. Meredith (1964)
Canonical correlations with fallible dataPsychometrika, 29
W. Nicewander, D. Wood (1975)
On the mathematical bases of the general canonical correlation index: Rejoinder to Miller.Psychological Bulletin, 82
This research addressed itself to the issue of the validity of student ratings of teachers, viewing the act of rating as an instance of person perception in which students’ needs were held to affect their perception of teachers. It was hypothesized that specified student needs would be related to ratings of specific teacher orientations congruent with those needs. Four hundred five graduate students completed the Personality Research Form and rated 12 teachers as portrayed in vignettes. The hypothesis was tested using canonical correlation analysis. Results indicated that the first three canonical sets were significant (p < .01) and that, in spite of some overlap within these sets, congruence between needs and ratings was obtained.
American Educational Research Journal – SAGE
Published: Nov 23, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.