Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Chao, J. Schor (1998)
Empirical tests of status consumption: Evidence from women's cosmeticsJournal of Economic Psychology, 19
G. Miller (2000)
Mental Traits as Fitness Indicators: Expanding Evolutionary Psychology's AdaptationismAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 907
R. Bird, E. Smith, Douglas Bird (2001)
The hunting handicap: costly signaling in human foraging strategiesBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50
Moty Amar, D. Ariely, M. Bar-Hillel, Z. Carmon, C. Ofir (2011)
Brand names act like marketing placebos
David Buss (1994)
The Evolution Of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating
Vladas Griskevicius, J. Tybur, Jill Sundie, R. Cialdini, G. Miller, D. Kenrick (2007)
Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: when romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals.Journal of personality and social psychology, 93 1
J. Benenson (2009)
Dominating versus eliminating the competition: Sex differences in human intrasexual aggressionBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 32
A. Hayes (2013)
Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach
K. Pine, B. Fletcher (2011)
Women’s spending behaviour is menstrual-cycle sensitivePersonality and Individual Differences, 50
A. Hama (2011)
Spent: Sex, Evolution, and Consumer BehaviorMankind Quarterly, 51
D. Buss (1988)
From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduatesEthology and Sociobiology, 9
I. Stephen, Angela McKeegan (2010)
Lip Colour Affects Perceived Sex Typicality and Attractiveness of Human FacesPerception, 39
M. Haselton, D. Buss, V. Oubaid, A. Angleitner (2005)
Sex, Lies, and Strategic Interference: The Psychology of Deception Between the SexesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31
L. Hudders (2012)
Why the devil wears Prada: Consumers’ purchase motives for luxuriesJournal of Brand Management, 19
Laurette Liesen (1996)
The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human MatingPolitics and the Life Sciences, 15
Donald Symons (1989)
Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 culturesBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 12
Gregory Shuler, David McCord (2010)
Determinants of Male Attractiveness : “ Hotness ” Ratings as a Function of Perceived Resources
D. Kenrick, Jill Sundie, Lionel Nicastle, Gregory Stone (2001)
Can one ever be too wealthy or too chaste? Searching for nonlinearities in mate judgment.Journal of personality and social psychology, 80 3
D. Wilson, Rick O’Gorman (2003)
Emotions and actions associated with norm-breaking eventsHuman Nature, 14
N. Etcoff, S. Stock, Lauren Haley, Sarah Vickery, D. House (2011)
Cosmetics as a Feature of the Extended Human Phenotype: Modulation of the Perception of Biologically Important Facial SignalsPLoS ONE, 6
(2010)
Niche marketing: The spending power of women
Jill Sundie, D. Kenrick, Vladas Griskevicius, J. Tybur, K. Vohs, D. Beal (2011)
Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system.Journal of personality and social psychology, 100 4
R. Meldola
Sexual SelectionNature, 3
R. Thornhill, S. Gangestad (1996)
The evolution of human sexuality.Trends in ecology & evolution, 11 2
(1999)
Waste is good
C. Backer, M. Nelissen, M. Fisher (2007)
Let’s Talk About Sex: A Study on the Recall of Gossip About Potential Mates and Sexual RivalsSex Roles, 56
Yajin Wang, Vladas Griskevicius (2014)
Conspicuous consumption, relationships, and rivals: Women's luxury products as signals to other womenJournal of Consumer Research, 40
Stephen Colarelli, Joseph Dettmann (2003)
Intuitive evolutionary perspectives in marketing practices1Psychology & Marketing, 20
Michael Dunn, R. Searle (2010)
Effect of manipulated prestige-car ownership on both sex attractiveness ratings.British journal of psychology, 101 Pt 1
Michael Dunn, A. Hill (2014)
Manipulated luxury-apartment ownership enhances opposite-sex attraction in females but not malesJournal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12
(2004)
Men and women prefer risk takers as romantic and nonromantic partners
Kristina Durante, Norman Li, M. Haselton (2008)
Changes in Women's Choice of Dress Across the Ovulatory Cycle: Naturalistic and Laboratory Task-Based EvidencePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34
Gad Saad (2007)
The evolutionary bases of consumption
K. Janssens, M. Pandelaere, B. Bergh, Kobe Millet, I. Lens, K. Roe (2011)
Can buy me love: Mate attraction goals lead to perceptual readiness for status productsJournal of Experimental Psychology: General, 47
M. Fisher, Anthony Cox, F. Gordon (2009)
SELF-PROMOTION VERSUS COMPETITOR DEROGATION: THE INFLUENCE OF SEX AND ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP STATUS ON INTRASEXUAL COMPETITION STRATEGY SELECTIONJournal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7
D. Geary, J. Vigil, Jennifer byrd-craven (2004)
Evolution of human mate choiceThe Journal of Sex Research, 41
A. Zahavi (1975)
Mate selection-a selection for a handicap.Journal of theoretical biology, 53 1
Gad Saad, John Vongas (2009)
The effect of conspicuous consumption on men’s testosterone levelsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110
Lawrence Sugiyama (2001)
Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mindAmerican Journal of Human Biology, 13
A. Campbell (2004)
Female competition: Causes, constraints, content, and contextsThe Journal of Sex Research, 41
Gad Saad, Eric Stenstrom (2012)
Calories, beauty, and ovulation: The effects of the menstrual cycle on food and appearance-related consumptionJournal of Consumer Psychology, 22
L. Hudders, M. Pandelaere, P. Vyncke (2013)
Consumer Meaning Making: The Meaning of Luxury Brands in a Democratised Luxury WorldInternational Journal of Market Research, 55
D. Schmitt (2002)
A meta-analysis of sex differences in romantic attraction: do rating contexts moderate tactic effectiveness judgments?The British journal of social psychology, 41 Pt 3
D. Schmitt, D. Buss
Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Strategic Self-promotion and Competitor Derogation: Sex and Context Effects on the Perceived Effectiveness of Mate Attraction Tactics
R. BliegeBird, EricAlden Smith (2005)
Signaling Theory, Strategic Interaction, and Symbolic Capital1Current Anthropology, 46
I. Lens, Karolien Driesmans, M. Pandelaere, K. Janssens (2012)
Would male conspicuous consumption capture the female eye? Menstrual cycle effects on women's attention to status productsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48
K. Rosvall (2011)
Intrasexual competition in females: evidence for sexual selection?Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology, 22 6
Nicola Stokburger-Sauer, K. Teichmann (2013)
Is luxury just a female thing? The role of gender in luxury brand consumption☆Journal of Business Research, 66
R. Nelissen, M. Meijers (2011)
Social benefits of luxury brands as costly signals of wealth and statusEuropean Public Law
(2009)
Deciding between competition derogation and self-promotion
Anthony Cox, M. Fisher (2008)
A FRAMEWORK FOR EXPLORING INTRASEXUAL COMPETITIONThe Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2
Martin Levinson (2013)
The Consuming Instinct: What Juicy Burgers, Ferraris, Pornography, and Gift Giving Reveal about Human Nature, 70
David Geary (1998)
Male, Female: The Evolution of Human Sex Differences
(2003)
Top of text Top of CT Base of DF Intuitive Evolutionary Perspectives in Marketing Practices
Gad Saad, Tripat Gill (2000)
Applications of evolutionary psychology in marketingPsychology & Marketing, 17
Previous studies on luxury consumption demonstrated that men spend large sums of money on luxury brands to signal their mate value to women and, thus, increase their reproductive success. Although women also spend copious amounts of money on luxuries, research focusing on women's motives for luxury consumption is rather scarce. Relying on costly signaling and intrasexual competition theory, the goal of the current study was to test whether female intrasexual competition in a mate attraction context triggers women's spending on luxuries. The results of the first experiment reveal that an intrasexual competition context enhances women's preferences for attractiveness enhancing, but not for non-attractiveness related luxuries such as a smartphone. This finding indicates that women may use luxury consumption as a self-promotion strategy during within-sex competitions, as these luxuries improve their advantages against same-sex rivals for mates. A follow-up study shows that compared to women who do not consume luxuries, women who do so are perceived as more attractive, flirty, young, ambitious, sexy, and less loyal, mature and smart by other women. These results suggest that luxury consumption may provide information about a women's willingness to engage in sex, as well as her views about other women, and consequently, her success in intrasexual competitions.
Evolutionary Psychology – SAGE
Published: Jul 1, 2014
Keywords: women; intrasexual competition; luxury consumption; sex differences; status
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.