Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Holland (1960)
Teaching machines: an application of principles from the laboratory.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 3
Diane Entrikin, R. York, Lou Brown (1977)
Teaching Trainable Level Multiply Handicapped Students to Use Picture Cues, Context Cues, and Initial Consonant Sounds to Determine the Labels of Unknown WordsResearch and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 2
M. Gold (1976)
Task Analysis of a Complex Assembly Task by the Retarded BlindExceptional Children, 43
Janis Hunter, G. Bellamy (1976)
Cable Harness Construction for Severely Retarded Adults: A Demonstration of Training TechniqueResearch and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 1
Lou Brown, Stephen Jones, Elizabeth Troccolo, Christine Heiser, T. Bellamy, E. Sontag (1972)
Teaching Functional Reading to Young Trainable Students: Toward Longitudinal Objectives 1The Journal of Special Education, 6
D. Knapczyk, R. Dever (1977)
Instructional Problem-Solving in Programming for the Severely HandicappedResearch and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 2
M. Gold (1972)
Stimulus factors in skill training of retarded adolescents on a complex assembly task: acquisition, transfer, and retention.American journal of mental deficiency, 76 5
D. Mithaug (1978)
Case Studies in the Management of Inappropriate Behaviors during Prevocational TrainingResearch and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 3
B. Skinner (1958)
Teaching machines.Scientific American, 205
D. Mithaug, Lee Hagmeier (1978)
The Development of Procedures to Assess Prevocational Competencies of Severely Handicapped Young AdultsResearch and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 3
J. Crosson (1969)
A technique for programming sheltered workshop environments for training severely retarded workers.American journal of mental deficiency, 73 5
L. Brown, T. Bellamy (1972)
A sequential procedure for teaching addition skills to trainable retarded students.The Training school bulletin, 69 1
This article reviews the historical origins and influences of two major instructional approaches, task analysis and programmed instruction, in order to (a) define the essential elements of each, (b) identify important similarities and differences, and (c) specify the functional relations that make programmed instruction and task analysis complementary components of an individualized training strategy. The article discusses the implications of these considerations by indicating that task analytic strategies and programmed instruction in combination are most valuable in training the specific job-related skills necessary for an imminent placement, while programmed instruction across different tasks may be most useful in developing career education plans and curricular sequences that train the generative vocational skills and worker behavior that apply to many tasks and job situations.
AAESPH Review – SAGE
Published: Jun 1, 1979
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.