Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Production of Admixed Animal–Human Embryos: Is It Necessary, or Merely Desirable?

The Production of Admixed Animal–Human Embryos: Is It Necessary, or Merely Desirable? ATLA 36, 119–121, 2008 119 Editorial The Production of Admixed Animal–Human Embryos: Is it Necessary, or Merely Desirable? When the Human Fertilisation and Embryology kind. Secondly, it is implied that vital medical Bill 2007–08 was approved by the House of Lords research would not be possible, if human embryonic on 4 February 2007, the British Government clearly stem cells could not be produced from admixed hoped that it would also have a smooth passage embryos. Thirdly, it is argued that only human through the House of Commons. However, it is embryonic stem cells would be suitable for this kind now clear that there is likely to be rough water of work. ahead. Blakemore’s letter itself is clearly deceptive, since The aim of the Bill is to provide “revised and he says that the new Bill “is essential if Britain is to updated legislation for assisted reproduction and maintain its responsible leadership in stem-cell changes to the regulation and licensing of the use of research”. The rather transparent seductiveness is embryos in research and therapy”. However, it is obvious: to be against the production of admixed the inclusion of “provision for research on different embryos is to be against the http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Alternatives to Laboratory Animals SAGE

The Production of Admixed Animal–Human Embryos: Is It Necessary, or Merely Desirable?

Balls, Michael
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals , Volume 36 (2): 3 – May 1, 2008
Download PDF
3 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/the-production-of-admixed-animal-human-embryos-is-it-necessary-or-oxT3q0rst9

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 2008 Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments
ISSN
0261-1929
eISSN
2632-3559
DOI
10.1177/026119290803600201
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ATLA 36, 119–121, 2008 119 Editorial The Production of Admixed Animal–Human Embryos: Is it Necessary, or Merely Desirable? When the Human Fertilisation and Embryology kind. Secondly, it is implied that vital medical Bill 2007–08 was approved by the House of Lords research would not be possible, if human embryonic on 4 February 2007, the British Government clearly stem cells could not be produced from admixed hoped that it would also have a smooth passage embryos. Thirdly, it is argued that only human through the House of Commons. However, it is embryonic stem cells would be suitable for this kind now clear that there is likely to be rough water of work. ahead. Blakemore’s letter itself is clearly deceptive, since The aim of the Bill is to provide “revised and he says that the new Bill “is essential if Britain is to updated legislation for assisted reproduction and maintain its responsible leadership in stem-cell changes to the regulation and licensing of the use of research”. The rather transparent seductiveness is embryos in research and therapy”. However, it is obvious: to be against the production of admixed the inclusion of “provision for research on different embryos is to be against the

Journal

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals – SAGE

Published: May 1, 2008

There are no references for this article.