Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Manager's Message— Teaching the Internal Memo

The Manager's Message— Teaching the Internal Memo other One item of interest was uncovered in the inves- as that instructors do to type- ing, expected, prefer grade The rate for the written rather than handwritten even tigation. response typewritten papers papers papers, was 68 to a 50 rate this is not reflected in the percent, compared percent response though preference apparently for the handwritten This difference in papers. response grades assigned. = = rates was df indicat- significant (X2 4.018, 1, p < .05), NOTEs 1. Joel. "Problems of the Bowman, The Vol. Fall 277-283. Grading Differential," 13, No. 4, 1976, pp. Journal, Journal Business Vol. Fall Achievement and of Communication, 11, No. 1, 1973, pp. 6. Clinton I. "The Impact of Expectations Chase, 21-30. on Journal Handwriting Quality Scoring Essay Tests," of Educational 2. Richard Hatch, A. and Stokes. "A Letter to the 39-42. Beverly Editor," Measurement, Vol. 16, No. 1, Spring 1979, pp. The Journal Fall W. Educational Outcomes: of Business Communication, Vol. 13, No.1, 1975, p. 7. Bruce Measuring Tuckman, 55. York: Harcourt Brace Fundamentals New Jovanovich, of Testing, 3. Ron and Annette Evaluative Criteria: A Dulek, Shelby. "Varying 1975, p. 129. Factor in Differential The Journal Business Norman E. Measurement and Evaluation http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png ABCA Bulletin SAGE

The Manager's Message— Teaching the Internal Memo

Reep, Diana C.
ABCA Bulletin , Volume 47 (1): 3 – Mar 1, 1984
Download PDF
3 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/the-manager-s-message-teaching-the-internal-memo-26j0O4xtAG

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © by SAGE Publications
ISSN
0001-0383
DOI
10.1177/108056998404700103
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

other One item of interest was uncovered in the inves- as that instructors do to type- ing, expected, prefer grade The rate for the written rather than handwritten even tigation. response typewritten papers papers papers, was 68 to a 50 rate this is not reflected in the percent, compared percent response though preference apparently for the handwritten This difference in papers. response grades assigned. = = rates was df indicat- significant (X2 4.018, 1, p < .05), NOTEs 1. Joel. "Problems of the Bowman, The Vol. Fall 277-283. Grading Differential," 13, No. 4, 1976, pp. Journal, Journal Business Vol. Fall Achievement and of Communication, 11, No. 1, 1973, pp. 6. Clinton I. "The Impact of Expectations Chase, 21-30. on Journal Handwriting Quality Scoring Essay Tests," of Educational 2. Richard Hatch, A. and Stokes. "A Letter to the 39-42. Beverly Editor," Measurement, Vol. 16, No. 1, Spring 1979, pp. The Journal Fall W. Educational Outcomes: of Business Communication, Vol. 13, No.1, 1975, p. 7. Bruce Measuring Tuckman, 55. York: Harcourt Brace Fundamentals New Jovanovich, of Testing, 3. Ron and Annette Evaluative Criteria: A Dulek, Shelby. "Varying 1975, p. 129. Factor in Differential The Journal Business Norman E. Measurement and Evaluation

Journal

ABCA Bulletin – SAGE

Published: Mar 1, 1984

There are no references for this article.