Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Influence of Heclo and Wildavsky's

The Influence of Heclo and Wildavsky's Hugh Heclo and Aaron Wildavsky's Private Government of Public Money was one of the most influential public policy books of the 1970s because of the flair of its analysis and its pioneering use of interviews with policy-makers. Despite a revision in 1981 it fails to predict the demise of the system it celebrated the Public Expenditure Survey and associated Policy Analysis and Review - and its influence on subsequent studies of the Treasury has not been great. More lasting have been its analytical themes - the notion of ‘political administrators ’including both ministers and officials, a ‘trial of personalities’ as the key to policy-making, and the importance of the technical dynamics of the system in constraining behaviour. It pioneered a new way of writing about British central administration, although its depersonalised and anonymised presentation, and masculinised image of the ‘club’ has been superseded. Some of the authors' policy prescriptions have also proved prescient. Although the book now seems to lack the systematic and quantitative analysis that its subject-matter invited, its written style is memorable and its effect on other researchers remains inspirational. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Public Policy and Administration SAGE

The Influence of Heclo and Wildavsky's

Parry, Richard
Public Policy and Administration , Volume 18 (4): 17 – Oct 1, 2003
Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/the-influence-of-heclo-and-wildavsky-s-ToLANquXoh

References (27)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © by SAGE Publications
ISSN
0952-0767
eISSN
1749-4192
DOI
10.1177/095207670301800402
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Hugh Heclo and Aaron Wildavsky's Private Government of Public Money was one of the most influential public policy books of the 1970s because of the flair of its analysis and its pioneering use of interviews with policy-makers. Despite a revision in 1981 it fails to predict the demise of the system it celebrated the Public Expenditure Survey and associated Policy Analysis and Review - and its influence on subsequent studies of the Treasury has not been great. More lasting have been its analytical themes - the notion of ‘political administrators ’including both ministers and officials, a ‘trial of personalities’ as the key to policy-making, and the importance of the technical dynamics of the system in constraining behaviour. It pioneered a new way of writing about British central administration, although its depersonalised and anonymised presentation, and masculinised image of the ‘club’ has been superseded. Some of the authors' policy prescriptions have also proved prescient. Although the book now seems to lack the systematic and quantitative analysis that its subject-matter invited, its written style is memorable and its effect on other researchers remains inspirational.

Journal

Public Policy and Administration – SAGE

Published: Oct 1, 2003

There are no references for this article.