Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1991)
Classroom acoustics for normal-hearing children: Implications for rehabilitation
F. Berg (1993)
Acoustics and Sound Systems in Schools
G. Chermak, F. Musiek (1997)
Central Auditory Processing Disorders: New Perspectives
D. Howard (1991)
Mild Hearing Loss and Aboriginal Children’s LearningThe Aboriginal Child at School, 19
D. Nelson, Daniel Nelson (1997)
Teacher and student satisfaction with freefield FM amplification systemsVolta Review, 99
J. Clark (1981)
Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification.ASHA, 23 7
C. Crandell, J. Smaldino (1994)
An Update of Classroom Acoustics for Children with Hearing Impairment.Volta Review, 96
C. Crandell, J. Smaldino (2000)
Classroom Acoustics for Children With Normal Hearing and With Hearing Impairment.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 31 4
C. Flexer, Kate Biley, Alyssa Hinkley, Cheryl Harkema, J. Holcomb (2002)
Using sound‐field systems to teach phonemic awareness to pre‐schoolersThe Hearing Journal, 55
J. Mcleay (1965)
THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Alan Jan (1975)
Behavior Modification in Applied Settings
(2000)
The startling possibility of sound-field
G. Rosenberg, Patricia Blake-Rahter, Judy Heavner, L. Allen, Beatrice Redmond, Janet Phillips, Kathy Stigers (1999)
Improving Classroom Acoustics (ICA): A Three-Year FM Sound Field Classroom Amplification Study., 7
A. Eriks-Brophy, M. Crago (1994)
Transforming Classroom Discourse: An Inuit Example.Language and Education, 8
Elaine Smith, S. Gray, H. Dove, L. Kirchner, Heidi Heras (1997)
Frequency and effects of teachers' voice problems.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 11 1
Christine Gotaas, Clark Starr (1993)
Vocal fatigue among teachers.Folia phoniatrica, 45 3
R. Massie, D. Theodorus, D. Byrne, D. Mcpherson, J. Smaldino (2001)
Differences in communications outcomes when utilising sound field FM amplification in the classrooms of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children [abstract]
(1994)
Aboriginal conductive hearing loss for life
J. Smaldino, C. Crandell (1999)
Speech Perception in the Classroom.Volta Review, 101
R. Massie, D. Theodoros, D. Bryne, B. McPherson, J. Smaldino (1999)
The effects of sound field classroom amplification on the cummunicative interactions of aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander childrenAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology, 21
P. Arnold, D. Canning (1999)
Does classroom amplification aid comprehension?British journal of audiology, 33 3
D. Nelson, Michèle Schmidt (1993)
Take Anything Else, but Leave My Classroom FM System!.Perspectives in Education and Deafness, 12
L. Thibault (2001)
Implementation of ANSI S12.60 acoustical performance criteria, design requirements and guidelines for schoolsJournal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110
(2000)
Literacy learning for children who are deaf or hard of hearing. Washington DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing
(1999)
An overview of sound-field FM amplification
(1999)
Alternatives in amplification: Use of sound-field FM systems in classrooms of Nunavik
(1986)
Speech recognition of children
P. Stelmachowicz, B. Hoover, D. Lewis, R. Kortekaas, A. Pittman (2000)
The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 43 4
K. Anderson (2001)
Voicing Concern about Noisy Classrooms.Educational Leadership, 58
P. Nelson, S. Soli (2000)
Acoustical Barriers to Learning: Children at Risk in Every Classroom.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 31 4
(2001)
Sound-field amplification for all: Data on the reduction of special education referrals can influence administrators. Advance for Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists
(1994)
Cultural behaviour, conflict and resolution
E. Pekkarinen, Vesa Viljancn (1991)
Acoustic conditions for speech communication in classrooms.Scandinavian audiology, 20 4
(1994)
Hearing impairment, phonological awareness, and the acoustic environment of the classroom
C. Flexer (1995)
Classroom Management Of Children With Minimal Hearing LossThe Hearing journal, 48
I. Titze, Julie Lemke, D. Montequin (1997)
Populations in the U.S. workforce who rely on voice as a primary tool of trade: a preliminary report.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 11 3
Fred, H., Bess, Stephen Sinclair, Donald, E., Riggs (1984)
Group Amplification in Schools for the Hearing ImpairedEar and Hearing, 5
Michael Nilsson, Donna Gelnett, J. Sullivan, S. Soli, R. Goldberg (1992)
Norms for the hearing in noise test: The influence of spatial separation, hearing loss, and English language experience on speech reception thresholdsJournal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92
J. Tyberghein (1984)
Hearing in children.Acta oto-rhino-laryngologica Belgica, 38 3
Christine Sapienza, C. Crandell, Brian Curtis (1999)
Effects of sound-field frequency modulation amplification on reducing teachers' sound pressure level in the classroom.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 13 3
C. Robson (1993)
Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers
(1995)
Considerations and strategies for amplifying the classroom
C. Crandell, J. Smaldino (1996)
Speech Perception in Noise by Children for Whom English Is a Second LanguageAmerican Journal of Audiology, 5
C. Crandell, J. Smaldino, C. Flexer (1995)
Sound-Field FM Amplification: Theory and Practical Applications.
C. Flexer (2002)
Rationale and use of sound field systems: An updateThe Hearing journal, 55
Michel Picard, Bradley Js (2001)
Revisiting speech interference in classrooms.Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology, 40 5
(1995)
Dual FM sound-field amplification: A flexible integrated classroom amplification system for mild to moderate conductive hearing loss
Arthur Boothroyd1 (2004)
Room Acoustics and Speech PerceptionSeminars in Hearing, 25
The aim of this study was to examine the effects of sound-field amplification intervention on the acquisition of specific educational goals for children in mainstream cross-cultural classrooms. Twelve classes of Year 2 children participated in the project. For classes 1 to 8, the listening environments were alternated between amplified and unamplified conditions, each condition being for two terms (one semester) of the school year. Beneficial effects of amplification were obtained in all three skill areas of reading, writing and numeracy. The beneficial effects occurred irrespective of whether the children had English as a native language or as a second language. Classes 9 to 12 were alternated between single-channel and dual-channel transmission options, each condition being for one semester of the school year. The results indicated that using different numbers of microphones did not affect the rate of acquisition of educational outcomes.
Australian Journal of Education – SAGE
Published: Apr 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.