Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Why has party conflict among elites increased if the electorate is dealigning? Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association
J. Mccormick (1992)
American Foreign Policy and Process
R. Fleisher, J. Bond (1988)
Are There Two Presidencies? Yes, But Only for RepublicansThe Journal of Politics, 50
(1994)
Congressional party leaders
J. Bond, R. Fleisher (1992)
The President in the Legislative Arena
Barry Bozeman, James Sundquist (1982)
The Decline and Resurgence of CongressJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1
L. Sigelman (1979)
A Reassessment of the Two Presidencies ThesisThe Journal of Politics, 41
John Jackson, John Kingdon (1992)
Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative VotesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 36
Richard Herrera, T. Epperlein, Eric Smith (1995)
The Stability of Congressional Roll-Call IndexesPolitical Research Quarterly, 48
Duane Oldfield, A. Wildavsky (1989)
Reconsidering the two presidenciesSociety, 26
R. Fleisher (1993)
Explaining the Change in Roll-Call Voting Behavior of Southern DemocratsThe Journal of Politics, 55
P. Peterson (1994)
The President, the Congress, and the making of foreign policy
R. Fleisher, J. Bond (1996)
The President in a More Partisan Legislative ArenaPolitical Research Quarterly, 49
Eric Smith, Richard Herrera, C. Herrera (1990)
The Measurement Characteristics of Congressional Roll-Call IndexesLegislative Studies Quarterly, 15
K. Hill, Stephen Hanna, Sahar Shafqat (1997)
The Liberal-Conservative Ideology of U.S. Senators: A New MeasureAmerican Journal of Political Science, 41
(1981)
Coalitions and politics
R. Bernstein, William Anthony (1974)
The ABM Issue in the Senate, 1968–1970: The Importance of IdeologyAmerican Political Science Review, 68
J. Mccormick (1985)
Congressional Voting On the Nuclear Freeze ResolutionsAmerican Politics Research, 13
(1995)
Clinton and Congress: A first year assessment
Steven Shull (1991)
The Two Presidencies: A Quarter Century Assessment
(1978)
Bond is a professor of political science at Texas A&M University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign in 1978
J. Thurber (1997)
Rivals for power : presidential-congressional relationsPolitical Science Quarterly, 112
P. Hurley, Rick Wilson (1989)
Partisan Voting Patterns in the U. S. Senate, 1877-1986Legislative Studies Quarterly, 14
A. Wildavsky (1998)
The two presidenciesSociety, 35
J. Mccormick, M. Black (1983)
Ideology and Senate Voting on the Panama Canal TreatiesLegislative Studies Quarterly, 8
J. Cohen (1982)
A Historical Reassessment of Wildavsky's "Two Presidencies" Thesis.Social Science Quarterly, 63
R. Fleisher (1985)
Economic Benefit, Ideology, and Senate Voting On the B-1 BomberAmerican Politics Research, 13
A. Wildavsky (1975)
Perspectives on the Presidency
J. Mccormick, E. Wittkopf (1992)
At the Water's EdgeAmerican Politics Research, 20
D. Brady, Joseph Cooper, P. Hurley (1979)
The Decline of Party in the U. S. House of Representatives, 1887-1968Legislative Studies Quarterly, 4
John Millett, Richard Neustadt, H. Finer, R. Tugwell, David Coyle (1960)
Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership., 13
J. Mccormick, E. Wittkopf (1990)
Bipartisanship, Partisanship, and Ideology in Congressional-Executive Foreign Policy Relations, 1947-1988The Journal of Politics, 52
Steven Shull, Lance Leloup (1981)
Reassessing the Reassessment: Comment on Sigelman's Note on the "Two Presidencies" ThesisThe Journal of Politics, 43
James Meernik (2007)
Southern Political Science Association Presidential Support in Congress : Conflict and Consensus on Foreign and Defense Policy
David Rohde (1991)
Parties and leaders in the postreform house
Gary Fink (1990)
At the Margins: Presidential Leadership of Congress.The Journal of American History, 77
(1990)
Bond are currently coediting a book titled
Presidential-congressional relations scholars have long debated whether the president is more successful on foreign policy than on domestic policy (Wildavsky, 1966). The debate has focused on differential success rates between foreign and domestic policy and whether the gap has narrowed over time. This focus, however, neglects an important dimension of Wildavsky's argument. Wildavsky also argued that presidents should dominate Congress in foreign policy. Hence, the thesis predicts high levels of success on foreign policy as well as differences between foreign and domestic policy. Looking at the trends in success on foreign and domestic votes, we observe that whereas the difference between foreign and domestic success rates shows up consistently for minority presidents, the absolute level of support on foreign and defense issues has declined since the second Reagan administration. Analysis of opposition party base behavior reveals that foreign policy voting has become considerably more partisan.
American Politics Quarterly – SAGE
Published: Nov 23, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.