Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
AUST. & N.Z. JOURNAL OF CR,IMINOLOGY (Sept., 1972): 5, 3 THE CRIMINAL LAW ESPECIALLY MUST BE CERTAIN, YET EVEN ... The Criminal Law Cannot Stand Still' G. SAWER •• THE title of this lecture draws attention to what many criminologists and radical critics of society may regard as a rather dry formal question. It Is certainly a question as to the form which an existing legal system exhibits, but I do not put it forward from any interest in form for its own sake. The general formal question, arising in all branches of a legal system, can be put as a choice between certainty and uncertainty. I am not concerned with the possibilities of explicit legal change by legislation, although what I have to say does have relevance for the form in which such legislative changes are expressed. What I am primarily concerned with is the ability or lack of ability of the Courts to develop, mould and adapt the law, as expressed in a form binding on them, to the changing circumstances of society. What I have put as a choice between certainty and uncertainty in the form of the law has an analogy with the distinction between
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology – SAGE
Published: Sep 1, 1972
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.