Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Pollitt, G. Bouckaert (2011)
Public management reform : a comparative analysis - new public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian State
J. Exel, G. Graaf (2005)
Q methodology: A sneak preview
K. O’Connor (2017)
What are the ideas and motivations of bureaucrats within a religiously contested society?International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83
Bruce Perlman, G. Gleason (2007)
Cultural Determinism versus Administrative Logic: Asian Values and Administrative Reform in Kazakhstan and UzbekistanInternational Journal of Public Administration, 30
C. Hood (1991)
A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONSPublic Administration, 69
Michael Boss (1974)
Economic theory of democracyPublic Choice, 19
K. O’Connor, S. Janenova, Colin Knox (2019)
Open Government in Authoritarian RegimesInternational Review of Public Policy
(2014)
Public Administration in Contested Societies. Houndsmills
M. Cross (2012)
Rethinking epistemic communities twenty years laterReview of International Studies, 39
C. Dunlop (2017)
Pathologies of Policy Learning: What are they and how do they Contribute to Policy Failure?Policy Learning and Policy Failure
(2015)
From Old Public Administration to the New Public Service Implications for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries
David Rosenbloom, Howard Mccurdy (2006)
Revisiting Waldo's Administrative State: Constancy and Change in Public Administration
C. Radaelli (2005)
Diffusion without convergence: how political context shapes the adoption of regulatory impact assessmentJournal of European Public Policy, 12
A. Oleinik, M. Yermekov, Zharas Kuatbekov (2015)
Power distance, sub-ethnic groups, and teams of civil servants: Overlooked factors of administrative reform in Kazakhstan?Public Policy and Administration, 30
A. Baimenov, Max Everest‐Phillips (2016)
A Shared Perspective on Public Administration and International DevelopmentPublic Administration Review, 76
J. Bryson, B. Crosby, L. Bloomberg (2014)
Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public managementPublic Administration Review, 74
F. Shayan (2014)
Doing Q-methodological research: theory, method and interpretationInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17
J. Loughlin, F. Hendriks, A. Lidström (2011)
The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe
B. Peters, J. Pierre (2000)
Citizens Versus the New Public ManagerAdministration & Society, 32
G. Tullock (2006)
The vote motivePublic Choice, 135
J. Buchanan, G. Tullock (1962)
The calculus of consent : logical foundations of constitutional democracySouthern Economic Journal, 29
(2017)
Civil service reform in Kazakhstan: Trajectory to the 30 most developed countries? International Review of Administrative Sciences
Luis Villanueva (2015)
THE NEW PUBLIC GOVERNANCE? EMERGING PERSPECTIVES ON THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF PUBLIC GOVERNANCE, 1
(1971)
Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton
K. Meier, L. O'toole (2006)
Bureaucracy in a Democratic State: A Governance Perspective
(2014)
Public value governance: Moving beyond
(1965)
Tullock G (1976) The Vote Motive
N. Young (2015)
The Politics of BureaucracyReviews in American History, 43
1887) The study of administration
(1999)
Q is accounting for tastes
Steven Brown (1978)
The Importance of Factors in Q Methodology: Statistical and Theoretical ConsiderationsOperant Subjectivity
K. Huxley, R. Andrews, James Downe, Valeria Guarneros-Meza (2016)
Administrative traditions and citizen participation in public policy: a comparative study of France, Germany, the UK and NorwayPolicy and Politics, 44
(1997)
State traditions, administrative reform and regionalization
Kathe Callahan, Melvin Dubnick, Dorothy Olshfski (2006)
War Narratives: Framing Our Understanding of the War on TerrorPublic Administration Review, 66
J. LoPiccolo (1989)
The Social Construction of Lesbianism.Psyccritiques, 34
Patrick Bishop, J. Wanna (2004)
Public Sector Reform
Gjalt Graaf (2011)
The Loyalties of Top Public AdministratorsJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21
S. Osborne (2010)
Introduction The (New) Public Governance: a suitable case for treatment?
R. Rhodes (2016)
Recovering the craft of public administrationPublic Administration Review, 76
D. Stone (2017)
Understanding the transfer of policy failure: Bricolage, experimentalism and translationPolicy and Politics, 45
(1973)
Bureaucracy Servant or Master. London: IEA
R. Rhodes (1998)
Different Roads to Unfamiliar Places: UK Experience in Comparative PerspectiveAustralian Journal of Public Administration, 57
K. O’Connor, J. Vaesen (2018)
Between Scylla and Charybdis? Twenty-Five Years Administrating the Contested Region of BrusselsAdministration & Society, 50
Steven Brown (1980)
Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science.
Colin Knox (2018)
Public Sector Reform in Central Asia and the CaucasusInternational Journal of Public Administration, 42
Sally Selden, Gene Brewer, J. Brudney (1999)
Reconciling Competing Values in Public AdministrationAdministration & Society, 31
Using Q-method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research. Available at: www.seri-us.org/pubs/Qprimer.pdf
A. Breton (1975)
The economic theory of representative government
(2014)
Public Administration in Contested Societies. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan
(2009)
Using Q-method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research
In an innovative approach, applied to a region of the world on which research remains in its infancy, this article identifies the dominant administrative reform traditions embedded within the administrative elites responsible for administrative reform in Eurasia. Our contribution is twofold. Firstly, we establish a mechanism for measuring bureaucrat perceptions of administrative reform that may be replicated in other regions, by identifying the extent to which the three dominant Western traditions of public service (traditional public administration, new public management and new public governance) have been embedded in Eurasian societies. The article thereby demonstrates the effectiveness of these turns in public administration to be ‘learned’ and become embedded within the psyche of elite-level bureaucrats in these Eurasian post-Soviet regimes. The article posits that, while members of these elites hold several common governance perceptions, understanding of administrative reform differs markedly between bureaucrats and is broadly aligned with various aspects of the three dominant turns in public administration. Therefore, it is recommended that some rebalancing needs to take place between international/regional public policy interventions and public administration interventions. While public policy interventions are of course required, the administrative foundations upon which they are built (or learned), require greater attention to the needs, skills and attitudes of practitioners.
Public Policy and Administration – SAGE
Published: Oct 1, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.