Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Moon, H. Roh, G. Cimellaro (2015)
Seismic Performance of Segmental Rocking Columns Connected with NiTi Martensitic SMA BarsAdvances in Structural Engineering, 18
Xiang Ma, M. Eatherton, J. Hajjar, H. Krawinkler, G. Deierlein (2010)
Seismic Design and Behavior of Steel Frames with Controlled Rocking - Part II: Large Scale Shake Table Testing and System Collapse Analysis
M. Wolski, J. Ricles, R. Sause (2009)
Experimental Study of a Self-Centering Beam–Column Connection with Bottom Flange Friction DeviceJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 135
A. López-Barraza, S. Ruiz, A. Reyes-Salazar, E. Bojórquez (2016)
Demands and distribution of hysteretic energy in moment resistant self-centering steel framesSteel and Composite Structures, 20
(2003)
Performance-based design for truss-frame structures using energy dissipation devices. In: Proceedings of forth international conference on behaviour of steel structures in seismic areas (STESSA
Ying-Cheng Lin, R. Sause, J. Ricles (2013)
Seismic Performance of a Large-Scale Steel Self-Centering Moment-Resisting Frame: MCE Hybrid Simulations and Quasi-Static Pushover TestsJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 139
(2006)
Shaking table tests on seismic response of steel braced frames
P. Clayton, Ching‐Yi Tsai, J. Berman, L. Lowes (2015)
Comparison of web plate numerical models for self‐centering steel plate shear wallsEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 44
T. Takamatsu, H. Tamai, T. Yamanishi, A. Matsuo (2006)
Self-centering performance of non-slip-type exposed column base
(2003)
Performance - based design for truss - frame structures using energy dissipation devices
G. Vegte (2004)
NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF BOLTED CONNECTIONS : THE IMPLICIT VERSUS THE EXPLICIT APPROACH
L. Wiebe, C. Christopoulos (2015)
Performance-Based Seismic Design of Controlled Rocking Steel Braced Frames. II: Design of Capacity-Protected ElementsJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 141
M. Hosseini, Younes Tirabadi, N. Hosseinzadeh (2013)
AN INNOVATIVE SEISMIC DESIGN FOR REPAIRABLE REGULAR STEEL BUILDINGS BY USING ROCKING MOTION AND CIRCUMFERENTIAL ENERGY DISSIPATING COLUMNS AT BASE LEVEL
J. Tait, J. Finnegan, G. Sidwell (2013)
A Low Damage Design Solution for a 15 Storey Steel Framed Building
K. Iwashita, H. Taniguchi, Taiga Ishihara (2003)
ENERGY APPROACH TO THE EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE OF BUILDING ALLOWING UPLIFT AT PILE HEADJournal of Structural and Construction Engineering (transactions of Aij), 68
T. Takeuchi, Xingchen Chen, R. Matsui (2015)
Seismic performance of controlled spine frames with energy-dissipating membersJournal of Constructional Steel Research, 114
M. Eatherton, L. Fahnestock, David Miller (2014)
Computational study of self‐centering buckling‐restrained braced frame seismic performanceEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 43
J. Erochko, C. Christopoulos, R. Tremblay (2014)
Detailed component modelling of a self-centering energy dissipative brace system
Daniel Dowden, P. Clayton, Chao‐Hsien Li, J. Berman, M. Bruneau, L. Lowes, K. Tsai (2016)
Full-Scale Pseudodynamic Testing of Self-Centering Steel Plate Shear WallsJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 142
L. Wiebe, C. Christopoulos (2015)
Performance-Based Seismic Design of Controlled Rocking Steel Braced Frames. I: Methodological Framework and Design of Base Rocking JointJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 141
M. Midorikawa, T. Azuhata, T. Ishihara, A. Wada (2006)
Shaking table tests on seismic response of steel braced frames with column upliftEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 35
M. Hosseini, E. Farsangi (2012)
Telescopic columns as a new base isolation system for vibration control of high-rise buildingsEarthquakes and Structures, 3
C. Chou, Jun‐Hen Chen (2011)
Seismic design and shake table tests of a steel post‐tensioned self‐centering moment frame with a slab accommodating frame expansionEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 40
Z. Zhou, X. He, J. Wu, C. Wang, S. Meng (2014)
Development of a novel self-centering buckling-restrained brace with BFRP composite tendonsSteel and Composite Structures, 16
A novel self-restoring uplift column was proposed to allow uplift of exterior column bases of core-outrigger structures, which may make upper structure rock and hence mitigate seismic damage. The self-restoring uplift column consists of two steel sub-columns, a steel shear panel and several post-tensioned strands. Besides uplift mechanism, energy dissipating and self-restoring mechanisms were involved to dissipate energy and reduce structural residual drift, respectively. Low cycle test of four one-seventh scaled specimens were conducted and then simulated by finite element analysis. Self-restoring capability and satisfactory energy dissipating ability were observed in experimental results. The calibrated finite element models were then used to explore key design issues of the self-restoring uplift column. It was indicated that the elastic state of post-tensioned strands and sufficient restoring force were the two main factors influencing the restoring behavior most. A simplified model for axial behavior of the self-restoring uplift column was developed to simplify the design of the self-restoring uplift column. Finally, key design requirements about gap opening, shear panel, and self-centering capability were discussed.
Advances in Structural Engineering – SAGE
Published: Aug 1, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.