Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Farrar, Jerry Czarnecki, H. Sohn, F. Hemez (2002)
A review of structural health monitoring literature 1996-2001
Y.L. Xu, J. Zhang, J.C. Li, Y. Xia (2009)
Experimental Investigation on Statistical Moment-based Structural Damage Detection MethodStructural Health Monitoring, 8
X. Li, S. Law (2010)
Adaptive Tikhonov regularization for damage detection based on nonlinear model updatingMechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 24
Rongrong Hou, Yong Xia, Y. Bao, Xiao-qing Zhou (2018)
Selection of regularization parameter for l1-regularized damage detectionJournal of Sound and Vibration
Yuhan Wu, Xiao-qing Zhou (2018)
L1 Regularized Model Updating for Structural Damage DetectionInternational Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics
Jeong‐Tae Kim, N. Stubbs (2003)
Crack detection in beam-type structures using frequency dataJournal of Sound and Vibration, 259
Y. Bao, Zuoqiang Shi, Xiaoyun Wang, Hui Li (2018)
Compressive sensing of wireless sensors based on group sparse optimization for structural health monitoringStructural Health Monitoring, 17
Rongrong Hou, Yong Xia, Xiao-qing Zhou (2018)
Structural damage detection based on l1 regularization using natural frequencies and mode shapesStructural Control and Health Monitoring, 25
E.J. Candes
Compressive Sampling
R. Chartrand, W. Yin (2008)
Iteratively reweighted algorithms for compressive sensing2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing
Yongchao Yang, Satish Nagarajaiah (2013)
Output-only modal identification with limited sensors using sparse component analysisJournal of Sound and Vibration, 332
Tong Zhang (2010)
Analysis of Multi-stage Convex Relaxation for Sparse RegularizationJ. Mach. Learn. Res., 11
W. Zuo, Deyu Meng, Lei Zhang, Xiangchu Feng, David Zhang (2013)
A Generalized Iterated Shrinkage Algorithm for Non-convex Sparse Coding2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision
H. Taylor, Stephen Banks, J. Mccoy (1979)
Deconvolution with the l 1 normGeophysics, 44
S. Foucart, M. Lai (2009)
Sparsest solutions of underdetermined linear systems via ℓq-minimization for 0Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 26
Zongben Xu, Hai Zhang, Yao Wang, Xiangyu Chang, Yong Liang (2010)
L1/2 regularizationScience China Information Sciences, 53
S. Weng, Yong Xia, You‐lin Xu, Hong-ping Zhu (2011)
An iterative substructuring approach to the calculation of eigensolution and eigensensitivityJournal of Sound and Vibration, 330
Y. Bao, J. Beck, Hui Li (2011)
Compressive sampling for accelerometer signals in structural health monitoringStructural Health Monitoring, 10
M. Mehrjoo, N. Khaji, H. Moharrami, A. Bahreininejad (2008)
Damage detection of truss bridge joints using Artificial Neural NetworksExpert Syst. Appl., 35
E. Candès, T. Tao (2005)
Decoding by linear programmingIEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 51
Y. Bao, Yan Yu, Hui Li, Xingquan Mao, Wenfeng Jiao, Zilong Zou, J. Ou (2015)
Compressive sensing‐based lost data recovery of fast‐moving wireless sensing for structural health monitoringStructural Control and Health Monitoring, 22
H. Hao, Yong Xia (2002)
Vibration-based Damage Detection of Structures by Genetic AlgorithmJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 16
Rayan Saab, Ö. Yilmaz (2008)
Sparse Recovery by Non-convex Optimization -- Instance OptimalityArXiv, abs/0809.0745
R. Chartrand, Valentina Staneva (2007)
Restricted isometry properties and nonconvex compressive sensingInverse Problems, 24
B. Weber, P. Paultre, J. Proulx (2007)
Structural damage detection using nonlinear parameter identification with Tikhonov regularizationStructural Control and Health Monitoring, 14
Mujdat Cetin, W. Karl (2001)
Feature-enhanced synthetic aperture radar image formation based on nonquadratic regularizationIEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society, 10 4
D. Formenti, M. Richardson (1982)
PARAMETER ESTIMATION FROM FREQUENCY RESPONSE MEASUREMENTS USING RATIONAL FRACTION POLYNOMIALS (TWENTY YEARS OF PROGRESS)
Ying Wang, H. Hao (2010)
An introduction to compressive sensing and its potential applications in structural engineering
S. Weng, Yong Xia, You‐lin Xu, Xiao-qing Zhou, Hong-ping Zhu (2009)
IMPROVED SUBSTRUCTURING METHOD FOR EIGENSOLUTIONS OF LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURESJournal of Sound and Vibration, 323
S. Doebling, C. Farrar, M. Prime, D. Shevitz (1996)
Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review
D. Donoho (2006)
For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal 𝓁1‐norm solution is also the sparsest solutionCommunications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 59
E. Candès, J. Romberg, T. Tao (2004)
Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency informationIEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52
Jun Zhang, You‐lin Xu, Yong Xia, Jingjing Li (2008)
A new statistical moment-based structural damage detection methodStructural Engineering and Mechanics, 30
Rongrong Hou, Yong Xia, Qi Xia, Xiao-qing Zhou (2018)
Genetic algorithm based optimal sensor placement for L1‐regularized damage detectionStructural Control and Health Monitoring, 26
Hong Zhang (1992)
Optimal sensor placementProceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
E. Hernandez (2014)
Identification of isolated structural damage from incomplete spectrum information using l1-norm minimizationMechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 46
Yonghui An, Binbin Li, J. Ou (2013)
An algorithm for damage localization in steel truss structures: Numerical simulation and experimental validationJournal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 24
Xiao-qing Zhou, Yong Xia, S. Weng (2015)
L1 regularization approach to structural damage detection using frequency dataStructural Health Monitoring, 14
R. Chartrand (2007)
Exact Reconstruction of Sparse Signals via Nonconvex MinimizationIEEE Signal Processing Letters, 14
O. Salawu (1997)
Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a reviewEngineering Structures, 19
S. Doebling, C. Farrar, P. Cornwell (1997)
DIAMOND: A graphical interface toolbox for comparative modal analysis and damage identification
Xingyu Fan, Jun Li, H. Hao, Shenglan Ma (2018)
Identification of Minor Structural Damage Based on Electromechanical Impedance Sensitivity and Sparse RegularizationJournal of Aerospace Engineering
S. Theodoridis, Y. Kopsinis, K. Slavakis (2012)
Sparsity-Aware Learning and Compressed Sensing: An OverviewArXiv, abs/1211.5231
E. Candès, T. Tao (2004)
Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies?IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52
R. Nelson (1976)
Simplified calculation of eigenvector derivativesAIAA Journal, 14
Gitta Kutyniok (2012)
Compressed Sensing
Laming Chen, Yuantao Gu (2015)
Local and global optimality of LP minimization for sparse recovery2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
B. Natarajan (1995)
Sparse Approximate Solutions to Linear SystemsSIAM J. Comput., 24
E. Candès, M. Wakin, Stephen Boyd (2007)
Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ1 MinimizationJournal of Fourier Analysis and Applications, 14
H. Engl, M. Hanke, A. Neubauer (1996)
Regularization of Inverse Problems
Yongchao Yang, Satish Nagarajaiah (2015)
Output-only modal identification by compressed sensing: Non-uniform low-rate random samplingMechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 56
Structural damage usually appears in a few sections or members only, which is sparse compared with the total elements of the entire structure. According to the sparse recovery theory, the recently developed damage detection methods employ the l1 regularization technique to exploit the sparsity condition of structural damage. However, in practice, the solution obtained by the l1 regularization is typically suboptimal. The l0 regularization technique outperforms the l1 regularization in various aspects for sparse recovery, whereas the associated nonconvex optimization problem is NP-hard and computationally infeasible. In this study, a damage detection method based on the iteratively reweighted l1 regularization algorithm is proposed. An iterative procedure is employed such that the nonconvex optimization problem of the l0 regularization can be efficiently solved through transforming it into a series of weighted l1 regularization problems. Experimental example demonstrates that the proposed damage detection method can accurately locate the sparse damage over a large number of elements. The advantage of the iteratively reweighted l1 regularization algorithm over the l1 regularization in damage detection is also demonstrated.
Advances in Structural Engineering – SAGE
Published: Apr 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.