Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
The structural behavior of an air-supported structure with long span and large volume probably experiencing severe deflation in a massive snow weather deserves in-depth assessment study for occupant’s safe evacuation. This article presents experimental and numerical studies on the loading deflation process of a 1:10 scale joined hemispherical-cylindrical air-supported structure, whereby three different sandbag loadings were respectively applied on the hemisphere in each test to study the effect of vertical loads to collapse process. Numerical models based on the vector form intrinsic finite element method were employed to predict the deflation responses of the structure under the three loading cases. The structural behavior was evaluated by the pressure response, the wrinkling distribution and development, and the structural collapse mode. A comparison of their pressure responses and structural deflated forms is made to evaluate the contribution of external loading to the deflation progress and the collapse mode. It is found that the pressure will decrease quickly first and then remain relatively stable at a higher level in response to a larger vertical load in addition to the membrane weight. Due to pressure reduction during deflation, the structure loses tension stress in vertical direction so that vertical wrinkles develop in addition to local wrinkles due to external loading. The vertical loading determines distribution of wrinkles in the structure hence produce different collapse progresses for the three loading deflation cases, and accordingly changes the residual pressure it needs to hold its deflated form. Accordingly, the study proposes a feasible method for residual pressure estimation by identifying the distribution of critical residual pressures at different heights from the equilibrium equation of vertical forces. The full-scale structure presents similar structural behaviors when subjected to snow loading deflation, and the feasible method is valid to predict its residual pressure.
Advances in Structural Engineering – SAGE
Published: Feb 1, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.