Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Z. Xiyuan (2002)
The Improved Parallel Multi-component Model for the Nonlinear Seismic Response Analysis of RC Walls and Its ApplicationJournal of Building Structures
C. Shao (2000)
A Shaking Table Test on Shear Wall Structure with Framed Short Pillars for High-Rise BuildingsBuilding Science
R. Dowell, F. Seible, E. Wilson (1998)
PIVOT HYSTERESIS MODEL FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE MEMBERSAci Structural Journal, 95
Jiang Huanjun (2003)
Research on application of macroscopic shear wall modelEarthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration
(2001)
Research on the design of shear wall with shore piers
(2005)
Push over analysis on reinforced concrete doubled shear wall
(1988)
Analytical modeling of RC structural walls
Zhao Bin (2004)
Shaking table experimental study of super-highrise building with shear wall (short limb shear wall)-tube structure systemJournal of Building Structures
(1997)
Short pier shear wall structure system in tall residence building
(2001)
Earthquake simulation test on short pier shear wall-core structure
Zhang Jian-wei (2005)
SEISMIC PERFORMANCE AND ENGINEERING APPLICATION OF RC SHORT-PIER SHEAR WALLS AND CORE WALLS WITH CONCEALED BRACINGSEngineering mechanics
Huang Dongsheng, Cheng Wenrang, Pc Structures (2005)
Low-cycle loading experiment study on symmetric double short-pier shear wallsJournal of Building Structures
Short pier RC shear wall structure with concealed bracings is put forward in this paper. Two 1/6 scale models of short pier RC shear wall structure with and without concealed bracings are tested on shaking table. Dynamic properties and responses of the two structures at different stages are studied, and the comparison of failure modes between the two models is also made. Results from the experiments indicate that at elastic stage, seismic performance of short pier shear wall structure with concealed bracing is similar to that of structure without concealed bracing. After concrete cracks appearing, the seismic performance of the former is much better than that of the latter. The displacement responses of the former are much smaller than that of the latter, and the cracks distribution areas in walls of the former is much wider than that of the latter. The energy dissipation capacity of the former is significantly improved compared with that of the latter. Nonlinear time history analysis is carried out and the calculating results agree well with the results from the experiments.
Advances in Structural Engineering – SAGE
Published: Apr 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.