Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Chang, J. Mander (1994)
SEISMIC ENERGY BASED FATIGUE DAMAGE ANALYSIS OF BRIDGE COLUMNS: PART I - EVALUATION OF SEISMIC CAPACITY. TECHNICAL REPORT
M. Menegotto (1973)
Method of analysis of cyclically loaded RC plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under normal force and bending, 13
D. Cusson, P. Paultre (1995)
Stress-Strain Model for Confined High-Strength ConcreteJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 121
Y. Mo, Shiang‐Jung Wang (2000)
Seismic Behavior of RC Columns with Various Tie ConfigurationsJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 126
(1973)
DRAIN-2D, A General Purpose Computer Program for Dynamic Analysis of Inelastic Plane Structures, Report EERC 73–6
M. Sargin (1971)
Stress-strain relationships for concrete and the analysis of structural concrete sections
Ashraf El-Bahy, S. Kunnath, W. Stone, A. Taylor (1999)
CUMULATIVE SEISMIC DAMAGE OF CIRCULAR BRIDGE COLUMNS: BENCHMARK AND LOW-CYCLE FATIGUE TESTSAci Structural Journal, 96
S. Sheikh, S. Uzumeri (1982)
Analytical Model for Concrete Confinement in Tied ColumnsJournal of the Structural Division, 108
T. Takeda (1970)
Reinforced Concrete response to simulated earthquakesJournal of the Structural Division, 96
(2008)
Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, http://opensees
J. Mander, M. Priestley, R. Park (1988)
Theoretical stress strain model for confined concreteJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 114
P. Madas, A. Elnashai (1992)
A new passive confinement model for the analysis of concrete structures subjected to cyclic and transient dynamic loadingEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 21
J. Hoshikuma, K. Kawashima, K. Nagaya, A. Taylor (1997)
STRESS-STRAIN MODEL FOR CONFINED REINFORCED CONCRETE IN BRIDGE PIERSJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 123
S. Kunnath, YeongAe Heo, Jon Mohle (2009)
Nonlinear Uniaxial Material Model for Reinforcing Steel BarsJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 135
M. Scott, G. Fenves (2006)
Plastic Hinge Integration Methods for Force-Based Beam¿Column ElementsJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 132
R. Riddell, Jaime Garcia, E. Garcés (2002)
Inelastic deformation response of SDOF systems subjected to earthquakesEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31
Paolo Emilio (1973)
Method of Analysis for Cyclically Loaded R. C. Plane Frames Including Changes in Geometry and Non-Elastic Behavior of Elements under Combined Normal Force and Bending
T. Ohno, T. Nishioka (1984)
AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON ENERGY ABSORPTION CAPACITY OF COLUMNS IN REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURESDoboku Gakkai Ronbunshu, 1984
S. Otani, Sozen (1972)
Behavior of Multistory Reinforced Concrete Frames During Earthquakes
Li Lee, Sang Han, Young Oh (1999)
Determination of ductility factor considering different hysteretic modelsEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 28
E. Spacone, F. Filippou, F. Taucer (1996)
FIBRE BEAM–COLUMN MODEL FOR NON‐LINEAR ANALYSIS OF R/C FRAMES: PART I. FORMULATIONEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 25
E. Hognestad (1951)
A STUDY OF COMBINED BENDING AND AXIAL LOAD IN REINFORCED CONCRETE MEMBERS; A REPORT OF AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY THE ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, UNDER AUSPICES OF THE ENGINEERING FOUNDATION, THROUGH THE REINFORCED CONCRETE RESEARCH COUNCIL.
Accurate constitutive models of the constituent materials in a reinforced concrete (RC) section, namely, unconfined concrete, confined concrete and reinforcing steel are necessary in fiber-based discretization of RC components for use in nonlinear analysis of RC structures. This paper examines the sensitivity to different constitutive models in predicting the inelastic seismic behavior of RC frame structures. In particular, the importance of incorporating confinement effects in modeling concrete behavior and including degrading effects in modeling the behavior of reinforcing steel bars so as to predict the monotonic, cyclic and seismic response of RC columns and frames is investigated. At the component level, it is shown that the inelastic response is controlled predominantly by the behavior of reinforcing steel. At the system level, the response of non-ductile structures is less sensitive to confined concrete models while the modeling of reinforcing steel is shown to influence the inelastic response of both non-ductile and ductile structures.
Advances in Structural Engineering – SAGE
Published: Feb 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.