Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Cairney, D. Carseldine (1989)
DRINK DRIVING AND RANDOM BREATH TESTING: A SURVEY OF KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, BELIEFS AND SELF REPORTED BEHAVIOUR
G. Jensen, M. Erickson, J. Gibbs (1978)
Perceived Risk of Punishment and Self-Reported DelinquencySocial Forces, 57
Harold Grasmick, D. Jacobs, Carol McCollom (1983)
Social Class and Social Control: An Application of Deterrence TheorySocial Forces, 62
K. Olden (1989)
Social Control of the Drinking DriverJAMA, 262
J. Cashmore (1985)
The impact of random breath testing in New South Wales
C. Keane, P. Maxim, J. Teevan (1993)
Drinking and Driving, Self-Control, and Gender: Testing a General Theory of CrimeJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30
R. Paternoster, L. Saltzman, Ted Chiricos, G. Waldo (1982)
Perceived Risk and Deterrence: Methodological Artifacts in Perceptual Deterrence ResearchJournal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 73
(1986)
A structural model of drink driving: Alcohol consumption
S. Brown (1995)
ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN PEER ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOUR, RANDOM BREATH TESTING EXPERIENCE AND DRINK DRIVING IN A POPULATION-REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIANS, 1
D. Nagin, R. Paternoster (1994)
PERSONAL CAPITAL AND SOCIAL CONTROL: THE DETERRENCE IMPLICATIONS OF A THEORY OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN CRIMINAL OFFENDING*Criminology, 32
P. Richards, C. Tittle (1981)
Gender and Perceived Chances of ArrestSocial Forces, 59
(1993)
A road safety mass media campaigns meta analysis, (Report No. CR 118). Canberra: Federal Office of Road Safety
T. Epperlein (1987)
Initial deterrent effects of the crackdown on drinking drivers in the state of Arizona.Accident; analysis and prevention, 19 4
(1979)
Socialleaming and deviant
R. Homel (1983)
The impact of random breath testing: drinking and driver survey February 1983
(1994)
SPSSfor Windows, Advanced statistics 6.1., Chicago: SPSS Inc. THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY
(1978)
Drunken driving: A tentative causal model
G. Murray, P. Erickson (1987)
Cross-sectional versus longitudinal research: An empirical comparison of projected and subsequent criminalitySocial Science Research, 16
(1983)
Perceived risk and social control: Do sanctions really deter? Law andSociety
Gary Sykes (1984)
Saturated enforcement: The efficacy of deterrence and drunk drivingJournal of Criminal Justice, 12
(1989)
Drinkdriving andrandom breath testing: A survey of knowledge, attitudes, beliefs aTUl selfreported behaviour, (Research note, RN3/89)
W. Minor, J. Harry (1982)
Deterrent and Experiential Effects in Perceptual Deterrence Research: a Replication and ExtensionJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 19
(1977)
Deterrence as social control: The legal and extra legal produc
(1986)
A structural model of drink driving: Alcohol consumption, social norms and moral commitment
(1982)
Words and misdeeds:Hypothetical choices versus past behaviour as measures of deviance
W. Loxley, Leigh Smith (1991)
Roadblock testing in Western Australia and the process of deterrenceAustralian Journal of Psychology, 43
R. Paternoster, L. Saltzman, G. Waldo, Ted Chiricos (1983)
Perceived risk and social control: Do sanctions really deter?Law & Society Review, 17
M. Sheehan (1994)
Alcohol controls and drink driving: the social context
R. Meier, W. Johnson (1977)
Deterrence as Social Control: The Legal and Extralegal Production of ConformityAmerican Sociological Review, 42
Richard Lundman (1986)
One-Wave Perceptual Deterrence Research: Some Grounds for the Renewed Examination of Cross-Sectional MethodsJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 23
H. Ross (1984)
SOCIAL CONTROL THROUGH DETERRENCE: DRINKING-AND-DRIVING LAWSReview of Sociology, 10
Harold Grasmick, R. Bursik (1990)
Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model.Law & Society Review, 24
Harold Grasmick, Donald Green (1980)
Legal punishment, social disapproval and internalization as inhibitors of illegal behavior.Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 71
(1993)
A road safety mass media campaigns meta analysis, (Report No. CR 118)
R. Homel (1987)
Policing the drinking driver: Random breath testing and the process of deterrenceJournal of Safety Research, 18
D. Berger, J. Snortum (1986)
A Structural Model of Drinking and Driving - Alcohol-Consumption, Social Norms, and Moral CommitmentsCriminology, 24
(1984)
Drinking driving police blitz activity, media coverage and alcohol...related traffic accident reduction, British Columbia: Police Services Branch, Ministry of Attorney General
R. DeVries, J. Tapp, F. Levine (1977)
Law, Justice, and the Individual in Society: Psychological and Legal Issues
(1982)
Perceived risk and deterrence
Donald Green (1989)
Measures of Illegal Behavior in Individual-Level Deterrence ResearchJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26
A. Piquero, R. Paternoster (1998)
An Application of Stafford and Warr's Reconceptualization of Deterrence to Drinking and DrivingJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35
L. Saltzman, R. Paternoster, G. Waldo, Ted Chiricos (1982)
Deterrent and Experiential Effects: the Problem of Causal Order in Perceptual Deterrence ResearchJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 19
H. Ross, R. McCleary, T. Epperlein (1981)
Deterrence of Drinking and Driving in France - An Evaluation of the Law of July 12, 1978Law & Society Review, 16
R. Akers, M. Krohn, L. Lanza-Kaduce, M. Radosevich (1979)
Social learning and deviant behavior: a specific test of a general theory.American sociological review, 44 4
(1988)
The effects of changes in availability of alcoholic beverages
J. Hagan (1982)
Deterrence Reconsidered: Methodological Innovations
The use of Random Breath Testing (RBT) to deter individuals from drink driving is seen as one of the major initiatives in Australian Road Safety. Viewed within the genre of general deterrence models, RBT enters the decision to drink and drive through increasing the perceived risk of being apprehended. Although long term crash statistics point to a possible link between the introduction of RBT and a reduction in drink driving, a number of researchers have questioned the stability of RBT as a counter measure. This paper analyses the deterrence effect of RBT in regional Queensland; an area where the rate of fatal crashes attributed to alcohol is high. The significant finding reported is that of itself the perceived threat of being apprehended does not significantly deter drink driving.
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology – SAGE
Published: Dec 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.