Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
This research is aimed at studying the seismic response of a single story non-buckling eccentrically braced steel frame (NBF) in relation to conventional moment resisting frame (MRF) and concentrically braced frame (CBF). The NBF is intended to combine the advantages of MRF and CBF and eliminate most of the disadvantages pertinent to these frames. Nonlinear static pushover and time history analyses are conducted to assess the performance of the NBF compared to the performance of MRF and CBF. The analyses results have revealed that the NBF has a more stable lateral force-deformation behavior compared to CBF. The energy dissipation capacity of the NBF is comparable to that of the MRF. The maximum drift of the NBF at small to medium intensity ground motions is comparable to that of the CBF and smaller than that of the MRF. At high intensity ground motions, the maximum drift of the NBF is smaller than those of both CBF and MRF. Furthermore the NBF is found to experience less damage to its essential structural components compared to other frames.
Advances in Structural Engineering – SAGE
Published: Feb 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.