Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Swineford, Peter Miller (1953)
Effects of directions regarding guessing on item statistics of a multiple-choice vocabulary test.Journal of Educational Psychology, 44
Paul Slovic (1964)
ASSESSMENT OF RISK TAKING BEHAVIOR.Psychological bulletin, 61
R. Ziller (1957)
A measure of the gambling response-set in objective testsPsychometrika, 22
D. Votaw (1936)
The effect of do-not-guess directions upon the validity of true-false or multiple choice tests.Journal of Educational Psychology, 27
(1956)
Gambling Proneness: Its Measurement and Expression in Examination Situations. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation
F. Swineford (1941)
Analysis of a personality trait.Journal of Educational Psychology, 32
N. Kogan, M. Wallach (1965)
Risk Taking: A Study in Cognition and Personality
D. Campbell, D. Fiske (1959)
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological bulletin, 56 2
C. Coombs, J. Milholland, F. Womer (1956)
The Assessment of Partial Knowledge1Educational and Psychological Measurement, 16
R. Ziller (1957)
Vocational Choice and Utility for RiskJournal of Counseling Psychology, 4
P. Slovic (1962)
Convergent validation of risk taking measures.Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 65
The Ordinary Objective Test as a Possible Criterion of Certain Personality Traits
F. Swineford (1938)
The measurement of a personality trait.Journal of Educational Psychology, 29
(1956)
Concept Mastery Test
L. Stone (1962)
Reliability of a Utility for Risk MeasurePsychological Reports, 10
C. Coombs (1953)
On the Use of Objective ExaminationsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 13
F. Swineford, Peter Miller (1952)
EFFECTS OF DIRECTIONS REGARDING GUESSING ON ITEM STATISTICS OF A MULTIPLE-CHOICE VOCABULARY TESTPsychometrika, 1952
Address: Department of Education Psychology
A. Sherriffs, D. Boomer (1954)
Who is penalized by the penalty for guessingJournal of Educational Psychology, 45
ASTIA Document No. 098926. Lackland Air Force Base, Texas: Air Force Personnel and Training research Center
MALCOLM J. SLAKTER State University of New York at Buffalo In many instances an individual is faced with a set of actions, each of which is associated with a stake to be lost if the action taken is un successful and a prize to be won if the action taken is successful. By some decision process the individual must select a single action from the entire set of possible actions. This process of selection is no doubt a highly complex one, and may differ not only for various individuals at the same time, but also for the same individual at different times. One variable conjectured as entering into this selection process is the presumed trait of risk taking. Recently, risk taking has become an in creasingly important variable in educational and psychological research. Indeed, a book by Kogan and Wallach (1964) is devoted entirely to risk taking and its relation to motivation, personality, intelligence, etc. Experimental studies of risk-taking propensities have differed with respect to such variables as skill task versus chance task, subjective probabilities versus objective probabilities, and the nature of the stake and prize. Although the latter variable would seem to be a crucial one, stakes and
American Educational Research Journal – SAGE
Published: Jun 24, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.