Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Edwards, L. Heathers (1962)
The first factor of the MMPI: social desirability or ego strength?Journal of consulting psychology, 26
A. Couch, K. Keniston (1960)
Yeasayers and naysayers: agreeing response set as a personality variable.Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 60
H. Eysenck (1962)
Response set, authoritarianism and personality questionnaires.The British journal of social and clinical psychology, 1
A. Buss, A. Durkee (1957)
An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility.Journal of consulting psychology, 21 4
A. Edwards, C. Diers (1962)
Social Desirability and the Factorial Interpretation of the MMPIEducational and Psychological Measurement, 22
A. Edwards, C. Diers, Jerald Walker (1962)
Response sets and factor loadings on sixty-one personality scales.Journal of Applied Psychology, 46
D. Crowne, D. Marlowe (1960)
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.Journal of consulting psychology, 24
B. Bass (1956)
Development and evaluation of a scale for measuring social acquiescence.Journal of abnormal psychology, 53 3
A. Edwards, C. Diers (1963)
Neutral Items as a Measure of AcquiescenceEducational and Psychological Measurement, 23
C. Cofer, June Chance, A. Judson (1949)
A study of malingering on the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory.The Journal of psychology, 27
A. Edwards, J. Walsh (1963)
The relationship between the intensity of the social desirability keying of a scale and the correlation of the scale with Edwards' SD scale and the first factor loading of the scaleJournal of Clinical Psychology, 19
A. Edwards (1958)
The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research
A. Edwards (1963)
A factor analysis of experimental social desirability and response set scales.Journal of Applied Psychology, 47
RESPONSE SETS IN STANDARD AND EXPERIMENTAL PERSONALITY SCALES* ALLE N L. EDWARDS and JAMES A. WALSH University of Washington In a factor analysis of 58 Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inven tory (MMPI) scales and 3 other personality scales (Edwards, Diers, an d Walker, 1962), it was found that the first factor could be inter preted as the tendency to give socially desirable responses and the second as the tendency to give acquiescent responses. The third factor was tentatively identified as the tendency to falsify answers to per sonality items. The present study was undertaken to determine whether the same three factors could be identified in a new battery consisting primarily of non-MMPI scales. METHO D Fro m Edwards' (1963) pool of 2,824 personality items, 240 items were selected to form six experimental social desirability scales, Scales 1-6, each consisting of 40 items. All of the items in these scales are keyed for socially desirable responses. A socially desirable response is defined as a True response to an item with a socially desirable scale value or as a False response to an item with a socially undesir able scale value. In Scales 1-4 there is a balance in the True-False keying,
American Educational Research Journal – SAGE
Published: Jun 23, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.