Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Response Sets in Standard and Experimental Personality Scales*:

Response Sets in Standard and Experimental Personality Scales*: RESPONSE SETS IN STANDARD AND EXPERIMENTAL PERSONALITY SCALES* ALLE N L. EDWARDS and JAMES A. WALSH University of Washington In a factor analysis of 58 Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inven­ tory (MMPI) scales and 3 other personality scales (Edwards, Diers, an d Walker, 1962), it was found that the first factor could be inter­ preted as the tendency to give socially desirable responses and the second as the tendency to give acquiescent responses. The third factor was tentatively identified as the tendency to falsify answers to per­ sonality items. The present study was undertaken to determine whether the same three factors could be identified in a new battery consisting primarily of non-MMPI scales. METHO D Fro m Edwards' (1963) pool of 2,824 personality items, 240 items were selected to form six experimental social desirability scales, Scales 1-6, each consisting of 40 items. All of the items in these scales are keyed for socially desirable responses. A socially desirable response is defined as a True response to an item with a socially desirable scale value or as a False response to an item with a socially undesir­ able scale value. In Scales 1-4 there is a balance in the True-False keying, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Educational Research Journal SAGE

Response Sets in Standard and Experimental Personality Scales*:

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/response-sets-in-standard-and-experimental-personality-scales-wIQGFZkSn0

References (13)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 by American Educational Research Association
ISSN
0002-8312
eISSN
1935-1011
DOI
10.3102/00028312001001052
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

RESPONSE SETS IN STANDARD AND EXPERIMENTAL PERSONALITY SCALES* ALLE N L. EDWARDS and JAMES A. WALSH University of Washington In a factor analysis of 58 Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inven­ tory (MMPI) scales and 3 other personality scales (Edwards, Diers, an d Walker, 1962), it was found that the first factor could be inter­ preted as the tendency to give socially desirable responses and the second as the tendency to give acquiescent responses. The third factor was tentatively identified as the tendency to falsify answers to per­ sonality items. The present study was undertaken to determine whether the same three factors could be identified in a new battery consisting primarily of non-MMPI scales. METHO D Fro m Edwards' (1963) pool of 2,824 personality items, 240 items were selected to form six experimental social desirability scales, Scales 1-6, each consisting of 40 items. All of the items in these scales are keyed for socially desirable responses. A socially desirable response is defined as a True response to an item with a socially desirable scale value or as a False response to an item with a socially undesir­ able scale value. In Scales 1-4 there is a balance in the True-False keying,

Journal

American Educational Research JournalSAGE

Published: Jun 23, 2016

There are no references for this article.