Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2006)
Seismic input energy of ground motions during the 2004 (M6.0) Parkfield, California earthquake
H. Sucuoğlu, Semih Yücemen, A. Gezer, A. Erberik (1998)
Statistical evaluation of the damage potential of earthquake ground motionsStructural Safety, 20
J. Hall, T. Heaton, M. Halling, D. Wald (1995)
Near-Source Ground Motion and its Effects on Flexible BuildingsEarthquake Spectra, 11
S. Kunnath, Q. Nghiem, S. El-Tawil (2004)
Modeling and Response Prediction in Performance-Based Seismic Evaluation: Case Studies of Instrumented Steel Moment-Frame BuildingsEarthquake Spectra, 20
M. Ordaz, Benjamín Huerta, E. Reinoso (2003)
Exact computation of input‐energy spectra from Fourier amplitude spectraEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 32
W. Iwan (1997)
DRIFT SPECTRUM: MEASURE OF DEMAND FOR EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONSJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 123
B. Alavi, H. Krawinkler (2004)
Behavior of moment‐resisting frame structures subjected to near‐fault ground motionsEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 33
H. Krawinkler (1987)
Performance Assessment of Steel ComponentsEarthquake Spectra, 3
J. Tembulkar, J. Nau (1987)
Inelastic Modeling and Seismic Energy DissipationJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 113
E. Kalkan (2006)
Prediction of Seismic Demands in Building Structures
C. Uang, V. Bertero (1990)
Evaluation of seismic energy in structuresEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 19
L. Decanini, F. Mollaioli (2001)
An energy-based methodology for the assessment of seismic demandSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 21
G. Amiri, F. Dana (2005)
Introduction of the most suitable parameter for selection of critical earthquakeComputers & Structures, 83
A. Terán-Gilmore (1998)
A Parametric Approach to Performance-Based Numerical Seismic DesignEarthquake Spectra, 14
M. Sasani, V. Bertero (2000)
IMPORTANCE OF SEVERE PULSE-TYPE GROUND MOTIONS IN PERFORMANCE-BASED ENGINEERING: HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REVIEW
G. Housner (1956)
Limit Design of Structures to Resist Earthquakes
C. Chou, C. Uang (2003)
A procedure for evaluating seismic energy demand of framed structuresEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 32
(1998)
Long seismic velocity pulses effect and damage
(1956)
The SMAC strong motion accelerograph and other latest instruments for measuring earthquakes and building vibrations
E. Kalkan, S. Kunnath (2007)
Effective Cyclic Energy as a Measure of Seismic DemandJournal of Earthquake Engineering, 11
S. Leelataviwat, S. Goel, B. Stojadinović (2002)
Energy-based Seismic Design of Structures using Yield Mechanism and Target DriftJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 128
C. Chou, C. Uang (2000)
Establishing absorbed energy spectra—an attenuation approachEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 29
Tadao Minami, Y. Osawa (1988)
Elastic‐plastic response spectra for different hysteretic rulesEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 16
P. Fajfar, Tomaž Vidic (1994)
Consistent inelastic design spectra: hysteretic and input energyEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 23
(1976)
Establishment of design earthquakes— Evaluation of present methods
Y. Shoji, K. Tanii, M. Kamiyama (2005)
A study on the duration and amplitude characteristics of earthquake ground motionsSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 25
G. Berg, S. Thomaides (1960)
Energy consumption by structures in strong-motion earthquakes : progress report by G.V. Berg and S. S. Thomaides.
I. Takewaki (2004)
BOUND OF EARTHQUAKE INPUT ENERGYJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 130
S. Mccabe, W. Hall (1989)
Assessment of Seismic Structural DamageJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 115
Y. Chai, P. Fajfar (2000)
A PROCEDURE FOR ESTIMATING INPUT ENERGY SPECTRA FOR SEISMIC DESIGNJournal of Earthquake Engineering, 4
S. Goel, G. Berg (1968)
Inelastic Earthquakes Response of Tall Steel FramesJournal of the Structural Division, 94
T. Heaton, J. Hall, D. Wald, M. Halling (1995)
Response of High-Rise and Base-Isolated Buildings to a Hypothetical Mw 7.0 Blind Thrust EarthquakeScience, 267
M. Trifunac, A. Brady (1975)
On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded strong ground motionBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 65
R. Riddell, Jaime Garcia (2001)
Hysteretic energy spectrum and damage controlEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 30
M. Chapman (1999)
On the Use of Elastic Input Energy for Seismic Hazard AnalysisEarthquake Spectra, 15
L. Ye, S. Otani (1999)
Maximum seismic displacement of inelastic systems based on energy conceptEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 28
E. Kalkan, S. Kunnath (2006)
Effects of Fling Step and Forward Directivity on Seismic Response of BuildingsEarthquake Spectra, 22
N. Makris, C. Black (2004)
Evaluation of Peak Ground Velocity as a “Good” Intensity Measure for Near-Source Ground MotionsJournal of Engineering Mechanics-asce, 130
Y. Park, Ang A.H.S. (1985)
SEISMIC DAMAGE ANALYSIS OF RC BUILDINGS, 111
G. Mavroeidis, G. Dong, A. Papageorgiou (2004)
Near‐fault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single‐degree‐of‐freedom (SDOF) systemsEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 33
A reassessment of input energy measures taking into consideration the characteristics of near fault ground motions is presented. The difference between absolute and relative energy input to structural systems is shown to be more significant for near-fault than far-fault records. In particular, the coherent velocity pulse contained in near-fault records resulting from a distinctive acceleration pulse rather than a succession of high frequency acceleration spikes produces sudden energy demand in the early phase of the response and is typically larger than the total energy accumulated at the end. Studies using idealized pulses indicate that input energy is a function of the shape and period of the velocity pulse. For spectral periods shorter than pulse period, greater absolute energy is input into the system rather than relative energy, while the reverse is true for spectral periods larger than the pulse period. The discrepancy between two energy definitions is initiated by the phase difference in ground velocity and system relative velocity, and it tends to be minimal as the pulse period approaches to system vibration period. The significance of these findings, based on linear SDOF simulations, is further investigated by examining the nonlinear seismic response of a group of realistic buildings subjected to near-fault recordings with and without apparent acceleration pulses. This study concludes that selection of appropriate energy measure for near-fault accelerograms should be based on the shape and period of dominant pulse in the record, and the vibration properties of the structural system.
Advances in Structural Engineering – SAGE
Published: Feb 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.