Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jennie Wilting, Julienne Provost, S. French (1974)
The freedom to learn.Nursing papers. Perspectives en nursing, 6 4
R. Decharms (1976)
Enhancing motivation : change in the classroom
J. Bargh, Y. Schul (1980)
On the Cognitive Benefits of TeachingJournal of Educational Psychology, 72
E. Deci (1976)
The hidden costs of rewardsOrganizational Dynamics, 4
(1975)
Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum
E. Deci, R. Ryan (1980)
The Empirical Exploration of Intrinsic Motivational Processes1Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13
(1970)
Instructional options: Adapting the large university course to individual differences
J. Bogen (1969)
The other side of the brain. II. An appositional mind.Bulletin of the Los Angeles neurological societies, 34 3
EDWARD L. DECI, Professor of Psychology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627.
New York State Division for Youth, State School at Industry, NY 14474. Specialization: Human motivation
V. Allen, R. Feldman (1973)
Learning through Tutoring: Low-Achieving Children as Tutors.Journal of Experimental Education, 42
(1978)
The detrimental effects of reward on performance
R. Cloward (1967)
Studies in Tutoring.Journal of Experimental Education, 36
S. Harter (1981)
A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components.Developmental Psychology, 17
J. Garbarino (1975)
The Impact of Anticipated Reward upon Cross-Age TutoringJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32
R. Zajonc (1960)
The process of cognitive tuning in communication.Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 61
E. Deci (1980)
The Psychology of Self-Determination
(1972)
Youth tutoring youth model for inschool neighborhood youth corps: An evaluation (Grant 42-0-005-034)
E. Deci, R. Ryan (1975)
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
R. White (1959)
Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence.Psychological review, 66
This study tested whether students who learned with an active orientation would be more intrinsically motivated to learn and would learn more than students who learned with a passive orientation. The active orientation was created by having subjects learn material with the expectation of teaching it to another student; the passive orientation was created by having subjects learn the same material with the expectation of being tested on it. The results indicate that subjects who learned in order to teach were more intrinsically motivated, had higher conceptual learning scores, and perceived themselves to be more actively engaged with the environment than subjects who learned in order to be examined. The two groups were equal, however, in their rote learning scores. The effects of exposure to the material were ruled out as an explanation because the two groups reported spending equal time with the material. The results are discussed in terms of intrinsic motivation theory.
American Educational Research Journal – SAGE
Published: Jun 24, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.