Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Punishing Criminals: a Study of the Relationship between Conservatism and Punitiveness

Punishing Criminals: a Study of the Relationship between Conservatism and Punitiveness AUST. & N.Z.J.C. OF CRIMINOLOGY (March, 1975): a.i Punishing Criminals: a Study of the Relationship between Conservatism and Punitiveness ROGER BOSHIER* and CAMILLE RAE*· PERSONS arguing for and against changing legal codes and the penal system often refer to the state of public opinion. Such a reference is well founded because despite the fact legislators are sometimes ahead of public opinion (as in New Zealand when the death penalty was abolished or behind public opinion such as the six o'clock swill persisting past the time when later closing was over­ whelmingly in favour) there is generally an attempt to administer justice and punishment in accordance with prevailing attitudes and behaviour. This is in keeping with the basic tenets of democracy but whether or not public opinion concerning penal policies is rational and based on the facts concerning the effec­ tiveness of strategies concerning the treatment of offenders is another question. Casual observation suaaests there is a widespread approval of retributive penal policies, But high recidivism rates suggest policies geared to punishment yield little social benefit (apart from keeping some undesirables temporarily out of circulation). Although there is frequent discussion concerning the need to make punishment suit the offenders (or http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology SAGE

Punishing Criminals: a Study of the Relationship between Conservatism and Punitiveness

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/punishing-criminals-a-study-of-the-relationship-between-conservatism-ePWDG1ZGVK

References (11)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © by SAGE Publications
ISSN
0004-8658
eISSN
1837-9273
DOI
10.1177/000486587500800105
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AUST. & N.Z.J.C. OF CRIMINOLOGY (March, 1975): a.i Punishing Criminals: a Study of the Relationship between Conservatism and Punitiveness ROGER BOSHIER* and CAMILLE RAE*· PERSONS arguing for and against changing legal codes and the penal system often refer to the state of public opinion. Such a reference is well founded because despite the fact legislators are sometimes ahead of public opinion (as in New Zealand when the death penalty was abolished or behind public opinion such as the six o'clock swill persisting past the time when later closing was over­ whelmingly in favour) there is generally an attempt to administer justice and punishment in accordance with prevailing attitudes and behaviour. This is in keeping with the basic tenets of democracy but whether or not public opinion concerning penal policies is rational and based on the facts concerning the effec­ tiveness of strategies concerning the treatment of offenders is another question. Casual observation suaaests there is a widespread approval of retributive penal policies, But high recidivism rates suggest policies geared to punishment yield little social benefit (apart from keeping some undesirables temporarily out of circulation). Although there is frequent discussion concerning the need to make punishment suit the offenders (or

Journal

Australian & New Zealand Journal of CriminologySAGE

Published: Mar 1, 1975

There are no references for this article.