Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Lindgaard, Gary Fernandes, Cathy Dudek, Judith Brown (2006)
Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression!Behaviour & Information Technology, 25
S. Kaplan, R. Kaplan, J. Wendt (1972)
Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual materialPerception & Psychophysics, 12
T. Garling (1976)
The Structural Analysis of Environmental Perception and CognitionEnvironment and Behavior, 8
N. Tractinsky, Adi Katz, D. Ikar (2000)
What is beautiful is usableInteract. Comput., 13
J. Solomon (2011)
Fechner's legacy in psychology : 150 years of elementary psychophysics
G. Lindgaard, Cathy Dudek, Devjani Sen, Livia Sumegi, Patrick Noonan (2011)
An exploration of relations between visual appeal, trustworthiness and perceived usability of homepagesACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact., 18
T. Whitfield (2000)
Beyond Prototypicality: Toward a Categorical-Motivation Model of AestheticsEmpirical Studies of the Arts, 18
S. Tyagi, C. Thurgood, T. Whitfield (2013)
Unravelling Novelty
Zainurul Rahman is currently working as an online educator in UX Design at RMIT Online. She holds a Ph.D. from RMIT University in the field of digital design and visual communications
E. Rosch, C. Mervis (1975)
Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categoriesCognitive Psychology, 7
(2011)
Mundane aesthetics
(2019)
Electrophysiological Measures of Aesthetic Processing (Doctoral dissertation
J. Blijlevens, C. Thurgood, P. Hekkert, Lin-Lin Chen, H. Leder, T. Whitfield (2017)
The aesthetic pleasure in design scale:The development of a scale to measure aesthetic pleasure for designed artifactsPsychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11
N. Vasudevan (2013)
A quantitative assessment of product form and its impact on customer perception and design education
E. Rosch (1978)
Principles of Categorization
Nuoya Li holds a Bachelor of Commerce in Finance and Marketing from the University of Melbourne and a Graduate Diploma in Psychology from Monash University
Michaël Berghman, P. Hekkert (2017)
Towards a unified model of aesthetic pleasure in designNew Ideas in Psychology, 47
T. Whitfield (1983)
Predicting preference for familiar, everyday objects: An experimental confrontation between two theories of aesthetic behaviourJournal of Environmental Psychology, 3
E. Rosch, C. Mervis, Wayne Gray, D. Johnson, P. Boyes-Braem (1976)
Basic objects in natural categoriesCognitive Psychology, 8
F. Phillips, J. F. Norman, A. M. Beers, J. Solomon (2011)
“Fechner’s aesthetics revisited”Fechner's legacy in psychology: 150 years of elementary psychophysics
(2014)
These awards highlight his strong commitment to important values for Swinburne University of Technology, showing commitment and leadership across all portfolios
W. Hung, Lin-lin Chen (2012)
Effects of Novelty and Its Dimensions on Aesthetic Preference in Product DesignInternational Journal of Design, 6
J. Norman, Amanda Beers, F. Phillips (2010)
Fechner's aesthetics revisited.Seeing and perceiving, 23 3
P. Hekkert, D. Snelders, P. Wieringen (2003)
'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design.British journal of psychology, 94 Pt 1
T. Gärling (1976)
The structural analysis of environmental perception and cognition: A multidimensional scaling approachEnvironment and Behaviour, 8
T. Whitfield, P. Slatter (1979)
The effects of categorization and prototypicality on aesthetic choice in a furniture selection task.British Journal of Psychology, 70
Mohd Yahaya (2017)
Investigating typicality and novelty through visual and tactile stimuli
There is a long history of humans attempting to understand what drives aesthetic preference. One line of inquiry examines the effects of typicality and novelty on aesthetic responses to designed products. There is currently a wide support towards the ‘Most Advanced Yet Acceptable’ (MAYA) principle, and studies underpinning this have focused on everyday objects. Despite the differences in the function of everyday objects, what they all have in common is their visibility. This do not tell us whether the aesthetic processing will be the same when applied to less visible objects. A study was undertaken using industrial boilers as stimuli and conducted on 7-point Likert scales with participants from Australia and China. The results are unequivocal: novelty makes a medium contribution, while typicality makes a low contribution. This is inconsistent with the notion that typicality is a major determinant of aesthetic preference, suggesting that the current models of aesthetic preference need elaboration.
Empirical Studies of the Arts – SAGE
Published: Jan 1, 2023
Keywords: typicality; novelty; aesthetic preference; industrial products; product design
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.