Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Fuyou Xu, Zhanbiao Zhang (2017)
Free vibration numerical simulation technique for extracting flutter derivatives of bridge decksJournal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 170
Guangzhong Gao, Ledong Zhu (2015)
Nonlinearity of mechanical damping and stiffness of a spring-suspended sectional model system for wind tunnel testsJournal of Sound and Vibration, 355
Tao Li, Teng Wu, Zhao Liu (2020)
Nonlinear unsteady bridge aerodynamics: Reduced-order modeling based on deep LSTM networksJournal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 198
Y. Tang, X. Hua, Zhengqing Chen, Y. Zhou (2019)
Experimental investigation of flutter characteristics of shallow Π section at post-critical regimeJournal of Fluids and Structures
Guangzhong Gao, Ledong Zhu, W. Han, Jiawu Li (2018)
Nonlinear post-flutter behavior and self-excited force model of a twin-side-girder bridge deckJournal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
Rui Zhang, Zhiwen Liu, Lianhua Wang, Zhengqing Chen (2021)
A practical method for predicting post-flutter behavior of a rectangular sectionJournal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 216
X. Amandolese, S. Michelin, Marc Choquel (2013)
Low speed flutter and limit cycle oscillations of a two-degree-of-freedom flat plate in a wind tunnelJournal of Fluids and Structures, 43
J. Larsen, S. Nielsen, S. Krenk (2007)
Dynamic Stall Model for Wind Turbine AirfoilsJournal of Fluids and Structures, 23
Mingjie Zhang, Fuyou Xu, Zhanbiao Zhang, Xuyong Ying (2019)
Energy budget analysis and engineering modeling of post-flutter limit cycle oscillation of a bridge deckJournal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
L. Morse-Fortier (2005)
Professor Robert H. Scanlan and the Tacoma Narrows Bridge
G. Schewe, H. Mai (2019)
Experiments on transonic limit-cycle-flutter of a flexible swept wingJournal of Fluids and Structures
G. Diana, D. Rocchi, T. Argentini, S. Muggiasca (2010)
Aerodynamic instability of a bridge deck section model: Linear and nonlinear approach to force modelingJournal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 98
Teng Wu, A. Kareem (2015)
A nonlinear analysis framework for bluff-body aerodynamics: A Volterra representation of the solution of Navier-Stokes equationsJournal of Fluids and Structures, 54
Teng Wu, A. Kareem (2011)
Modeling hysteretic nonlinear behavior of bridge aerodynamics via cellular automata nested neural networkJournal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 99
Siyuan Lin, Qi Wang, N. Nikitas, H. Liao (2019)
Effects of oscillation amplitude on motion-induced forces for 5:1 rectangular cylindersJournal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
Teng Wu, A. Kareem (2014)
Simulation of nonlinear bridge aerodynamics: A sparse third-order Volterra modelJournal of Sound and Vibration, 333
X Chen, A Kareem (2003)
Efficacy of tuned mass dampers for bridge flutter controlJournal of Structural Engineering, 129
R. Scanlan (2000)
MOTION-RELATED BODY-FORCE FUNCTIONS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOW-SPEED FLOWJournal of Fluids and Structures, 14
Nonlinear flutter behaviors of a π-shaped sectional bridge deck are investigated numerically, focusing on the effects on the post-flutter limit cycle oscillation (LCO) amplitudes caused by various nonlinearities, including aeroelastic, structural damping, and geometric nonlinearity. The Multi-stage indicial functions (IFs) are adapted to describe the nonlinear aeroelastic effects in time-domain, which necessitate amplitude-dependent aeroelastic model parameters. The motion amplitude-dependent parameters are mainly extracted numerically with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method and partially examined by experimentally extracted results. The CFD-based parameters turn out to be satisfactory compared with experimental results. Finally, the flutter thresholds and post-flutter limit cycle oscillations are simulated using the present time-domain multi-stage indicial functions model. The numerical results show that introduction of any one kind of nonlinearity (aeroelastic, structural damping, or geometric) in the numerical procedure can lead to LCO. These three kinds of nonlinearity are compared in detail in terms of the effects they have on the post-flutter LCO amplitude. It turns out that the damping nonlinearity, for the case concerned in this work, is the most important factor that determines the post-flutter LCO amplitude and the flutter onset wind speed as well. The time-domain multi-stage indicial functions procedure adopted in this work can serve as an efficient solving strategy to obtain nonlinear post-flutter performances of long-span bridges.
Advances in Structural Engineering – SAGE
Published: Jul 1, 2022
Keywords: Nonlinear aeroelasticity; post-flutter; limit cycle oscillation; indicial function; π-shaped bridge section
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.