Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
218 Adoption & Fostering 45(2) was clearly agreed in the original proceed- There has been no similar discussion about ings that the children’s welfare was best the making of a care order and SGO at the served by them remaining in K’s care but same time because it does not seem to have subject to care orders. There does not seem been considered as an option before (or at to have been any doubt that K could not be least not in reported cases). It may be time approved as a foster carer (it was not one of to start that discussion. those cases where the court could ask the local authority to support the carer to Alexandra Conroy-Harris, Legal Consultant allow them to be approved) and so the (England), CoramBAAF, prepared local authority could only lawfully make a these notes. placement with him under the ‘Placement with P’ chapter (Part 4, Chapter 1) of the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (England) Regulations 2010. P is defined as Application to move child to reside with (a) a parent, (b) someone with parental mother in the European Union responsibility or (c) a person named as M & F: In
Adoption & Fostering – SAGE
Published: Jul 1, 2021
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.