Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/sage/measurement-and-modeling-choices-in-studies-of-time-and-learning-JYk0Y3OQku
References (5)
-
B. Brown, Dan Saks (1979)
Research Issues Concerning the Production and Finance of Schooling. Research Series No. 65. -
J. Carroll (1963)
A Model of School LearningTeachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 64
-
W. Fredrick, H. Walberg (1980)
Learning as a Function of TimeJournal of Educational Research, 73
-
B. Rosenshine (1978)
Academic Engaged Time, Content Covered, and Direct InstructionJournal of Education, 160
-
J. Brophy (1979)
Teacher behavior and its effects
- Publisher
- SAGE
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2019 by American Educational Research Association
- ISSN
- 0002-8312
- eISSN
- 1935-1011
- DOI
- 10.3102/00028312018002157
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The consequences of using alternative measures of time and achievement are examined in an observational study of 18 elementary school classes. Of the four measures of time used—scheduled time, actual instructional time, engaged time and engaged rate—the engagement measures produced the more consequential effects of time for learning. Nonetheless, measures of allocated time are still important because they provide the constraints within which the results for engagement time must be interpreted. Mathematics achievement, measured as standardized and as chapter specific tests, was not consistently related to the time measures. This paper examines the extent to which the choice of the same model linking time and learning for all students was implicated in these inconsistent results.
Journal
American Educational Research Journal – SAGE
Published: Nov 23, 2016