Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1999)
The Future Organisation ofPrison Health Care
J. Benson (1975)
The Interorganizational Network as a Political EconomyAdministrative Science Quarterly, 20
D. Marks-Maran (1999)
Reconstructing nursing: evidence, artistry and the curriculum.Nurse education today, 19 1
B. Hudson (1987)
Collaboration in Social Welfare: a framework for analysisPolicy and Politics, 15
C. Quinn, A. Barton (2000)
The implications of drug treatment and testing orders.Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987), 14 27
A. Crawford, Matthew Jones (1996)
Kirkholt Revisited: Some Reflections on the Transferability of Crime Prevention InitiativesHoward Journal of Criminal Justice, 35
D. Whetten (1981)
Interorganizational Relations: A Review of the Field.The Journal of Higher Education, 52
A. Barton (1999)
Sentenced to treatment? Criminal justice orders and the health serviceCritical Social Policy, 19
J. Weiss (1981)
Substance vs. symbol in administrative reform: the case of human services coordination.Policy analysis, 7 1
(1998)
Stationery Office). Department of Health
(1988)
Inter-Agency Co-operation: Rhetoric and Reality
Interview with Research Team
J. Weinstein (1997)
The Development of Shared Learning: Conspiracy or Constructive Development?
(1996)
The History of Child Protection in Britain: A Theoretical Reformulation', Crime Order and Policing, Scarman Centre for the Study of Public Order Occasional Paper no
E. Litwak, Lydia Hylton (1962)
Interorganizational Analysis: A Hypothesis on Co-ordinating AgenciesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 6
(1997)
Exploring Inter-Professional Education: The Advantages and Barriers
J. Øvretveit (1997)
How to Describe Interprofessional Working
Just over a decade ago Hudson (1987) noted that inter-agency working was ‘in vogue’. Today is it a central feature of the work of all professionals, whatever sector they occupy. Indeed, recent government policy documents seem to promote closer ties between health and care agencies and those from the criminal justice system. However, despite joint working being part of the day-to-day activities of most professions it still presents a host of difficulties, often revolving around the standard operating procedures of sometimes-disparate organisations. In some instances, negotiation and compromise between and across agencies overcome difficulties. However, recent legislation, which mandates joint working between different sectors, aided by government departmental guidelines, seeks to ensure that welfare providers alter some long-standing approaches to working arrangements. This paper argues that health and care professionals should adopt a cautious approach to these moves and need to become more proactive in policy formation in order to establish boundaries and maintain their distinct professional identity.
Public Policy and Administration – SAGE
Published: Apr 1, 2001
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.