Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Teachers College, Columbia University. Specialization: Human learning, mental measurement
A. Jensen (1973)
Genetics and educationBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 21
(1970)
On intelligence. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
A. Jensen (1970)
A Theory of Primary and Secondary Familial Mental RetardationInternational Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 4
A. Jensen (1971)
Individual Differences in Visual and Auditory Memory.Journal of Educational Psychology, 62
Richard Green, W. Rohwer (1971)
SES Differences on Learning and Ability Tests in Black Children1 2, 8
A. Jensen (1968)
Patterns of mental ability and socioeconomic status.Science, 160 3826
(1970)
Hierarchical theories of mental ability
H. Gough (1971)
A Cluster Analysis of Home Index Status ItemsPsychological Reports, 28
J. Rapier (1968)
Learning abilities of normal and retarded children as a function of social class.Journal of educational psychology, 59 2
R. Havighurst, J. Coleman, E. Campbell, C. Hobson, James McPartland, A. Mood, F. Weinfeld, R. York (1967)
Equality of Educational Opportunity.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62
A. Hendrickson, P. White (1964)
PROMAX: A QUICK METHOD FOR ROTATION TO OBLIQUE SIMPLE STRUCTUREBritish Journal of Statistical Psychology, 17
A. Jensen (1974)
Interaction of Level I and Level II abilities with race and socioeconomic status.Journal of Educational Psychology, 66
H. Gough (1949)
A short social status inventory.Journal of Educational Psychology, 40
A large battery of various tests of intelligence, scholastic achievement, and short-term memory was administered to some 2,000 white, Negro and Mexican-American pupils in grades, 4,5, and 6 in a largely agricultural school district in the central valley of California. The three grades were used as separate replications of the study. Factor analysis (i.e., principal components) with oblique rotation yielded three main factors, identified as fluid (gf) and crystalized (gc) intelligence (both are aspects of Level II ability in Jensen's theory) and a memory factor (a Level I ability). Mean factor scores for the three ethnic groups differed significantly and showed significant interactions with ethnicity largely in accord with expectations from Jensen's two-level theory of abilities. The white and Negro groups differed markedly in gc and gf but not in memory; the white and Mexican groups differed markedly in gc, and much less in gf and memory. The Negro and Mexican groups differed the most in gf but only slightly in gc. There were also systematic ethnic group differences in the pattern of intercorrelations among factor scores, and in the correlations of the factor scores with an index of socioeconomic status. The results are discussed in relation to Jensen's two-level theory of mental abilities and Cattell's theory of fluid and crystalized intelligence.
American Educational Research Journal – SAGE
Published: Nov 23, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.