Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

`It really was rather disgraceful. Still, that is politics'

`It really was rather disgraceful. Still, that is politics' The 1964—70 Labour Governments were formally committed to a major expansion and reorganization of education in Britain, at both secondary and higher levels. Alongside the commitment to `comprehensivisation' of secondary schools and the expansion of universities, Labour was also committed to raising the school leaving age from 15 to 16. However, the increasingly severe economic problems that affected Britain from 1966 onwards, culminating in devaluation in November 1967, prompted an urgent search for significant cutbacks in public expenditure, with one of the casualties being the raising of the school leaving age. A case study of this decision reveals several aspects of interest to students of public policy and administration, including the extent to which short-term economic exigencies were privileged over long-term social objectives. This enabled the Treasury to exercise dominance over spending Departments, with its senior officials presenting the options for financial savings in a manner that led almost ineluctably to the raising of the school leaving age being sacrificed. The decision also revealed the existence of tensions within the Cabinet, not merely on traditional ideological and inter-Departmental grounds, important though these were, but also, to some extent, in terms of the socio-educational backgrounds of Ministers. Consequently, the Treasury and its officials were able to pursue a subtle process of `divide and rule' among Ministers and their Departments. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Public Policy and Administration SAGE

`It really was rather disgraceful. Still, that is politics'

Dorey, Peter
Public Policy and Administration , Volume 23 (4): 17 – Oct 1, 2008
Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/it-really-was-rather-disgraceful-still-that-is-politics-ylLQ0C3bzr

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © by SAGE Publications
ISSN
0952-0767
eISSN
1749-4192
DOI
10.1177/0952076708093251
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The 1964—70 Labour Governments were formally committed to a major expansion and reorganization of education in Britain, at both secondary and higher levels. Alongside the commitment to `comprehensivisation' of secondary schools and the expansion of universities, Labour was also committed to raising the school leaving age from 15 to 16. However, the increasingly severe economic problems that affected Britain from 1966 onwards, culminating in devaluation in November 1967, prompted an urgent search for significant cutbacks in public expenditure, with one of the casualties being the raising of the school leaving age. A case study of this decision reveals several aspects of interest to students of public policy and administration, including the extent to which short-term economic exigencies were privileged over long-term social objectives. This enabled the Treasury to exercise dominance over spending Departments, with its senior officials presenting the options for financial savings in a manner that led almost ineluctably to the raising of the school leaving age being sacrificed. The decision also revealed the existence of tensions within the Cabinet, not merely on traditional ideological and inter-Departmental grounds, important though these were, but also, to some extent, in terms of the socio-educational backgrounds of Ministers. Consequently, the Treasury and its officials were able to pursue a subtle process of `divide and rule' among Ministers and their Departments.

Journal

Public Policy and Administration – SAGE

Published: Oct 1, 2008

There are no references for this article.