Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Brown, H. Kalish, I. Farber (1951)
Conditioned fear as revealed by magnitude of startle response to an auditory stimulus.Journal of experimental psychology, 41 5
A. Mehrabian (1968)
Male and Female Scales of the Tendency to AchieveEducational and Psychological Measurement, 28
J. Warm, F. Kanfer, S. Kuwada, J. Clark (1972)
Motivation in vigilance: effects of self-evaluation and experimenter-controlled feedback.Journal of experimental psychology, 92 1
H. Hotelling (1951)
A Generalized T Test and Measure of Multivariate Dispersion
H. Schmidt (1941)
The effects of praise and blame as incentives to learningThe Psychological Monographs, 53
A. Mehrabian (1969)
Measures of Achieving TendencyEducational and Psychological Measurement, 29
Hani Riet (1964)
Effects of praise and reproof on paired-associate learning in educationally retarded children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 55
B. Bridgeman (1974)
Effects of Test Score Feedback on Immediately Subsequent Test Performance.Journal of Educational Psychology, 66
N. Feather (1966)
Effects of prior success and failure on expectations of success and subsequent performance.Journal of personality and social psychology, 3 3
J. Atkinson, J. Raynor (1974)
Motivation and achievement
E. Hurlock (1925)
An Evaluation of Certain Incentives Used in School Work.Journal of Educational Psychology, 16
E. Locke, Norman Cartledge, Jeffrey Koeppel (1968)
Motivational effects of knowledge of results: A goal-setting phenomenon?Psychological Bulletin, 70
I. Farber, H. Mcfann, K. Spence (1956)
The relation of anxiety (drive) level to performance in competitional and non-competitional paired-associates learning.Journal of experimental psychology, 52 5
James Block, Peter Airasian, B. Bloom, J. Carroll (1971)
Mastery Learning: Theory and Practice
(1978)
Difference score short forms of Mehrabian's scales of resultant achievement motivation
S. Karabenick, Z. Youssef (1968)
Performance as a function of achievement motive level and perceived difficulty.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10
This study investigated the effects of initial achievement orientation and prior success feedback on the rate of mastery of subsequent easy and difficult tasks. Eighty male introductory psychology students (40 high in initial achievement orientation and 40 low) were administered six trials of a digit-symbol substitution task on which they received either success feedback or no feedback. All participants then learned an easy or difficult list of paired-associates with no feedback about performance given. Results indicate success facilitates digit-symbol performance in general, but slightly more so for participants initially low in achievement orientation. The transfer effects of prior success feedback indicated a disordinal Trait by Treatment by Task Difficulty interaction. Here, prior success feedback has: 1) no effect on rate of mastery of a subsequent easy task, 2) a positive transfer effect on rate of mastery of a subsequent difficult task for participants initially high in achievement orientation, and 3) a negative transfer effect on rate of mastery of a subsequent difficult task for participants initially low in achievement orientation.
American Educational Research Journal – SAGE
Published: Nov 23, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.