Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Y. Dror (1969)
Public Policymaking Reexamined
Gilbert Smith, D. May (1980)
The Artificial Debate Between Rationalist and Incrementalist Models of Decision MakingPolicy and Politics, 8
(1984)
Policy Analysis for the Real
H. Elcock (1991)
Change and decay? : public administration in the 1990s
R. Crossman (1976)
The Diaries of a Cabinet Minister
M. Keating (1998)
What's wrong with asymmetrical government?Regional & Federal Studies, 8
Michael Hill (1993)
The Policy process: A reader
(1969)
Report of the Royal Commission on Local Government in England (Redcliffe-Maud), three volumes
B. Leach (1985)
The government of the English provincial conurbationsLocal Government Studies, 11
(1994)
The Local Government Review: Key Issues and Choices
(1983)
Streamlining the Cities: Government Proposals for Reorganizing Local Government in Greater London and the Metropolitan Counties
(1978)
Report to the Greater London Council by Sir Frank Marshall
David Wilson (1988)
LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN CRISISParliamentary Affairs, 41
(1976)
The Process ofLocal Government Reform 1966-74, (London: Allen and Unwin). Public Policy and Administration Volume
H. Wiseman (1970)
Local government in England, 1958-69;
Bruce Wood, John Redcliffe-Maud (1976)
The process of local government reform, 1966-74
C. Foster, D. Braybrooke, C. Lindblom (1963)
A Strategy of Decision
Marjorie McIntosh (1961)
The Report of the Royal Commission on Local Government in Greater LondonBritish Journal of Sociology, 12
J. Stewart, G. Stoker (1995)
Local government in the 1990s
R. Gregory (1989)
Political Rationality or 'Incrementalism'? Charles E. Lindblom's enduring contribution to public policy making theoryPolicy and Politics, 17
O. join, C. Lindblom (1965)
The intelligence of democracy : decision making through mutual adjustment, 18
(1984)
Report of the Committee ofInquiry into the Functions and Powers of the Island Councils in Scotland
Alan Alexander (1982)
Local government in Britain since reorganisation
(1997)
Territorial debates about local government: or Don't reorganise, don't, don't, don't!' to be published in Elcock
Amitai Etzioni (1967)
Mixed-Scanning: A 'Third' Approach to Decision-MakingMicroeconomics: Search; Learning; Information Costs & Specific Knowledge; Expectation & Speculation eJournal
(1981)
Report of the Committee ofInquiry into Local Government
(1968)
Public Policymaking Reexamined, (Scranton, Pa: Chandler)
Frank Smallwood, J. Brand (2022)
Local Government Reform in England
R. Leach (1994)
Restructuring local governmentLocal Government Studies, 20
C. Lindblom (1959)
THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGHEmergence: Complexity and Organization, 19
C. Ham, Michael Hill (1984)
The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State
(1971)
Reform ofLocal Government in England: Government Proposals for Reorganisation
(1995)
A Progress Report, (London: HMSO). The Local Government Commission for England (1995, March), Renewing Local Government in the English Shires: A Report
H. Simon (1960)
The new science of management decision
David Wilson (1996)
THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION: EXAMINING THE CONSULTATIVE PROCESSPublic Administration, 74
Alan Alexander (1982)
The politics of local government in the United Kingdom
C. Lindblom (1979)
Still Muddling, Not Yet Through.Public Administration Review, 39
(1984)
The Redundant Counties
S. Leach, H. Davis (1996)
Enabling or Disabling Local Government: Choices for the Future
S. Brittan, H. Heclo, A. Wildavsky (1975)
The Private Government of Public MoneyAmerican Political Science Review, 71
G. Jones (1973)
THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972 AND THE REDCLIFFE‐MAUD COMMISSIONThe Political Quarterly, 44
Great Office. (1979)
Organic Change in Local Government
This article seeks to apply rationalist and incrementalist models of the policy process to local government reorganisation from 1957 to 1996. The ambiguities and tensions in the models between description and prescription and between process and outcome are briefly explored, and the complexity of the models acknowledged, as a prelude to their application to the wide variety of approaches to the structural reorganisation of local government. While the quasi-incremental processes of the 1958 and 1992 Local Government Commissions are widely perceived to have failed, most of the recommendations of the more ostensibly rational Herbert, Wheatley and Redcliffe-Maud Royal Commissions have not endured, suggesting some inherent problems with both models. The frequency and extent of changes in local government structure scarcely confirm incrementalist expectations over outcomes, yet the failure of the more radical innovations to win long-term acceptance and legitimacy may be held to give some retrospective justification for gradualist caution. However, the cumulative failure of the reform process may ultimately reflect a misdiagnosis of the underlying problems of local government - essentially a rationalist critique. If a defective structure was not the main problem, reorganisation was not the solution.
Public Policy and Administration – SAGE
Published: Jul 1, 1997
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.