Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B. Vanfossen, James Jones, Joan Spade (1987)
CURRICULUM TRACKING AND STATUS MAINTENANCESociology Of Education, 60
J. Garofalo, F. Lester (1985)
Metacognition, Cognitive Monitoring, and Mathematical Performance.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16
R. Bosker (1995)
Boekbespreking van "A.S. Bryk & S.W. Raudenbusch - Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods" : Sage Publications, Newbury Parki, London/New Delhi 1992, 62
R. Mayer (1992)
Cognition and Instruction: Their Historic Meeting within Educational Psychology.Journal of Educational Psychology, 84
R. Mayer (1982)
Memory for algebra story problems.Journal of Educational Psychology, 74
H. McKay (1946)
The World of NumbersNature, 157
Inger Wistedt (1994)
Reflection, communication, and learning mathematics: A case studyLearning and Instruction, 4
(1992)
Curriculum differentiation: Opportunities, outcomes, and meanings
A. King (1989)
Effects of self-questioning training on college students' comprehension of lecturesContemporary Educational Psychology, 14
A. Schoenfeld (1987)
Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education
N. Webb, Sydney Farivar (1994)
Promoting Helping Behavior in Cooperative Small Groups in Middle School Mathematics, 31
R. Slavin, N. Karweit (1984)
Mastery Learning and Student Teams: A Factorial Experiment in Urban General Mathematics Classes, 21
Z. Mevarech (1991)
Learning Mathematics in Different Mastery EnvironmentsJournal of Educational Research, 84
Clarke Rl (1988)
What's all the fuss about?Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association, 42 12
Z. Mevarech, Ziva Susak (1993)
Effects of Learning with Cooperative-Mastery Method on Elementary StudentsJournal of Educational Research, 86
C. Weaver, W. Kintsch (1992)
Enhancing students' comprehension of the conceptual structure of algebra word problems.Journal of Educational Psychology, 84
R. Glaser, L. Resnick (2018)
Knowing, Learning, and Instruction
(1990)
N. D. [The world of numbers. Textbook for learning mathematics in seventh grade
(1990)
Academic tracking (Report of the NEA Executive Committee, Subcommittee on Academic Tracking)
Adam Gamoran (1993)
Alternative Uses of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: Can We Bring High-Quality Instruction to Low-Ability Classes?American Journal of Education, 102
R. Marx, J. Walsh (1988)
Learning from Academic TasksThe Elementary School Journal, 88
H. Walberg (1991)
Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser.Psyccritiques, 36
Nira Hativa (1988)
Computer-Based Drill and Practice in Arithmetic: Widening the Gap Between High- and Low-Achieving Students, 25
(1973)
How to solve it (2nd ed.)
Michael Meloth, Paul Deering (1994)
Task Talk and Task Awareness Under Different Cooperative Learning Conditions, 31
F. Lester (1989)
The Role of Metacognition in Mathematical Problem Solving: A Study of Two Grade Seven Classes. Final Report.
Elizabeth Useem (1992)
Middle schools and math groups: Parents' involvement in children's placement.Sociology Of Education, 65
E. Cohen, R. Lotan (1995)
Producing Equal-Status Interaction in the Heterogeneous ClassroomAmerican Educational Research Journal, 32
Alice Artz, E. Armour-Thomas (1992)
Development of a Cognitive-Metacognitive Framework for Protocol Analysis of Mathematical Problem Solving in Small GroupsCognition and Instruction, 9
S. Raudenbush, A. Bryk (1992)
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
B. Bloom (1979)
Human Characteristics and School Learning
B. Bloom (1956)
Taxonomy of educational objectives
A. King (1991)
Effects of training in strategic questioning on children's problem-solving performanceJournal of Educational Psychology, 83
A. King (1994)
Guiding Knowledge Construction in the Classroom: Effects of Teaching Children How to Question and How to Explain, 31
M. Wittrock (1989)
Generative Processes of ComprehensionEducational Psychologist, 24
Chen-Lin Kulik, J. Kulik (1981)
Effects of Ability Grouping on Secondary School Students: A Meta-analysis of Evaluation Findings, 19
Cognition, metacognition, and mathematical understanding: Teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms
L. Fuchs, D. Fuchs, C. Hamlett, N. Phillips, J. Bentz (1994)
Classwide Curriculum-Based Measurement: Helping General Educators Meet the Challenge of Student DiversityExceptional Children, 60
N. Webb (1989)
Peer interaction and learning in small groupsInternational Journal of Educational Research, 13
J. Oakes, G. Guiton (1995)
Matchmaking: The Dynamics of High School Tracking DecisionsAmerican Educational Research Journal, 32
R. Slavin, N. Madden, L. Dolan, B. Wasik, S. Ross, Lana Smith (1994)
'Whenever and Wherever We Choose': The Replication of 'Success for All.' (Program for Disadvantaged Students)Phi Delta Kappan, 75
A. King (1990)
Enhancing Peer Interaction and Learning in the Classroom Through Reciprocal Questioning, 27
R. Slavin (1990)
Achievement Effects of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Best-Evidence SynthesisReview of Educational Research, 60
Z. Mevarech (1985)
The Effects of Cooperative Mastery Learning Strategies on Mathematics AchievementJournal of Educational Research, 78
Daniel French, S. Rothman (1990)
Structuring Schools for Student Success: A Focus on Ability Grouping.
Neil Davidson, D. Kroll (1991)
An Overview of Research on Cooperative Learning Related to Mathematics.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22
B. Bloom, D. Krathwohl (1966)
Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain
The purpose of the present research was to design an innovative instructional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms (with no tracking) and to investigate its effects on students’ mathematics achievement. The method is based on current theories in social cognition and metacognition. It consists of three interdependent components: metacognitive activities, peer interaction, and systematic provision of feedback-corrective-enrichment. The method is called IMPROVE, the acronym of which represents all the teaching steps that constitute the method: Introducing the new concepts, Metacognitive questioning, Practicing, Reviewing and reducing difficulties, Obtaining mastery, Verification, and Enrichment. The research includes two studies, both implemented in seventh grades: One focused on in-depth analyses of students’ information processing under the different learning conditions (N = 247), and one investigated the development of students’ mathematical reasoning over a full academic year (N = 265). Results of both studies showed that IMPROVE students significantly outperformed the nontreatment control groups on various measures of mathematics achievement. The theoretical and practical implications of the research are discussed.
American Educational Research Journal – SAGE
Published: Jun 23, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.