Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Mehdi Rajabzadeh, A. Haghighat (2017)
Energy-aware framework with Markov chain-based parallel simulated annealing algorithm for dynamic management of virtual machines in cloud data centersThe Journal of Supercomputing, 73
Rongrong Hou, Yong Xia, Qi Xia, Xiao-qing Zhou (2018)
Genetic algorithm based optimal sensor placement for L1‐regularized damage detectionStructural Control and Health Monitoring, 26
R. Allemang, David. Brown (1982)
A Correlation Coefficient for Modal Vector Analysis
Peng Li, Liuwei Huang, Jiachao Peng (2018)
Sensor Distribution Optimization for Structural Impact Monitoring Based on NSGA-II and Wavelet DecompositionSensors (Basel, Switzerland), 18
Minwoo Chang, S. Pakzad (2014)
Optimal Sensor Placement for Modal Identification of Bridge Systems Considering Number of Sensing NodesJournal of Bridge Engineering, 19
D. Kammer (1990)
Sensor Placement for On-Orbit Modal Identification and Correlation of Large Space Structures1990 American Control Conference
Yu Wen-bai (2011)
An Optimal Sensor Placement Methods Based on the Effective Independence Method
Tarapada Roy, D. Chakraborty (2008)
Genetic algorithm based optimal design for vibration control of composite shell structures using piezoelectric sensors and actuatorsInternational Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design, 5
K. Nor, A. Muthalif, A. Wahid (2013)
Ant Colony Optimization for Controller and Sensor-Actuator Location in Active Vibration ControlJournal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 32
Dongsheng Li, Hongnan Li, C. Fritzen (2007)
The connection between effective independence and modal kinetic energy methods for sensor placementJournal of Sound and Vibration, 305
C. Papadimitriou (2004)
Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systemsJournal of Sound and Vibration, 278
J. Lynch, A. Sundararajan, K. Law, A. Kiremidjian, E. Carryer (2004)
Institute of Physics Publishing Smart Materials and Structures Optimal Placement of Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring Using Improved Genetic Algorithms
Xun Zhang, Juelong Li, Jianchun Xing, Ping Wang, Qiliang Yang, Ronghao Wang, Can He (2014)
Optimal Sensor Placement for Latticed Shell Structure Based on an Improved Particle Swarm Optimization AlgorithmMathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014
C. Papadimitriou, G. Lombaert (2012)
The effect of prediction error correlation on optimal sensor placement in structural dynamicsMechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 28
Liu Maojun, Tong Tiaosheng (1999)
A PARTHENO GENETIC ALGORITHM AND ANALYSIS ON ITS GLOBAL CONVERGENCE
K. Worden, A. Burrows (2001)
Optimal sensor placement for fault detectionEngineering Structures, 23
L. Yao, W. Sethares, D. Kammer (1993)
Sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification via a genetic algorithmAIAA Journal, 31
T. Yi, Hongnan Li, M. Gu (2011)
Optimal Sensor Placement for Health Monitoring of High-Rise Structure Based on Genetic AlgorithmMathematical Problems in Engineering, 2011
J. Holland (1992)
Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence
G. Gomes, S. Cunha, Patrícia Alexandrino, Bruno Sousa, A. Ancelotti (2018)
Sensor placement optimization applied to laminated composite plates under vibrationStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 58
Minwoo Chang, S. Pakzad (2015)
Optimal sensor configuration for flexible structures with multi-dimensional mode shapesSmart Materials and Structures, 24
F. Udwadia (1994)
Methodology for Optimum Sensor Locations for Parameter Identification in Dynamic SystemsJournal of Engineering Mechanics-asce, 120
G. Housner, L. Bergman, T. Caughey, A. Chassiakos, R. Claus, S. Masri, R. Skelton, T. Soong, B. Spencer, J. Yao (1997)
STRUCTURAL CONTROL: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTUREJournal of Engineering Mechanics-asce, 123
F. Kang, Junjie Li, Qing Xu (2008)
Virus coevolution partheno-genetic algorithms for optimal sensor placementAdv. Eng. Informatics, 22
An-Pan Cherng (2003)
OPTIMAL SENSOR PLACEMENT FOR MODAL PARAMETER IDENTIFICATION USING SIGNAL SUBSPACE CORRELATION TECHNIQUESMechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 17
T. Haniš, M. Hromčík (2012)
Optimal sensors placement and spillover suppressionMechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 28
M. Srinivas, L. Patnaik (1994)
Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithmsIEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 24
(2001)
Comparison between partheno-genetic algorithm and traditional genetic algorithm
A. Rao, G. Anandakumar (2007)
Optimal placement of sensors for structural system identification and health monitoring using a hybrid swarm intelligence techniqueSmart Materials and Structures, 16
S. Feng, J. Jia, J. Zhang (2017)
Sensor Configuration Optimizing in Modal Identification by Siege ant Colony AlgorithmJournal of Mechanics, 33
(2015)
Study of optimal sensor placement in bridge monitoring based on improved partheno-genetic
Chen Yang, Xuepan Zhang, Hu Xiaoqi, Chen Zheng-ai, Xinghua Zhang, Xinbin Hou (2017)
Optimal sensor placement for deployable antenna module health monitoring in SSPS using genetic algorithmActa Astronautica, 140
Jiancong Bai, Huiyou Chang, Yang Yi (2005)
A partheno-genetic algorithm for multidimensional knapsack problem2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 5
T. Yi, Hongnan Li, Xu-Dong Zhang (2012)
Sensor placement on Canton Tower for health monitoring using asynchronous-climb monkey algorithmSmart Materials and Structures, 21
(1996)
Sensor placement guide for model comparison and improvement
Optimal sensor placement is an important component of a reliability structural health monitoring system for a large-scale complex structure. However, the current research mainly focuses on optimizing sensor placement problem for structures without any initial sensor layout. In some cases, the experienced engineers will first determine the key position of whole structure must place sensors, that is, initial sensor layout. Moreover, current genetic algorithm or partheno-genetic algorithm will change the position of the initial sensor locations in the iterative process, so it is unadaptable for optimal sensor placement problem based on initial sensor layout. In this article, an optimal sensor placement method based on initial sensor layout using improved partheno-genetic algorithm is proposed. First, some improved genetic operations of partheno-genetic algorithm for sensor placement optimization with initial sensor layout are presented, such as segmented swap, reverse and insert operator to avoid the change of initial sensor locations. Then, the objective function for optimal sensor placement problem is presented based on modal assurance criterion, modal energy criterion, and sensor placement cost. At last, the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed method are validated by a numerical example of a quayside container crane. Furthermore, the sensor placement result with the proposed method is better than that with effective independence method without initial sensor layout and the traditional partheno-genetic algorithm.
Advances in Structural Engineering – SAGE
Published: Jan 1, 2021
Keywords: effective independence method,initial sensor layout,optimal sensor placement,partheno-genetic algorithm,structural health monitoring
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.