Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/sage/grasping-at-threads-and-finding-power-in-networks-ssEiEM4Lg5
References (16)
-
M. Foucault (1982)
The Subject and PowerCritical Inquiry, 8
-
Antonio Negri, M. Henninger (2007)
Art and Culture in the Age of Empire and the Time of the MultitudesSubStance, 36
-
Luc Boltanski, Eve Chiapello (2005)
The New Spirit of CapitalismInternational Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 18
-
B. Latour (1991)
We Have Never Been Modern -
P. Baran (1964)
On Distributed Communications: VIII. The Multiplexing Station -
C. Fuchs (1970)
Some Reflections on Manuel Castells??? Book ???Communication Power???tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 7
-
C. Fuchs (2012)
Some Reflections on Manuel Castells’ Book "Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age".tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 10
-
David Golumbia (2009)
The Cultural Logic of Computation -
Liccardo Pacula (2015)
RAND Corporation -
(1977)
Discipline and punish. London: Penguin -
M. Castells (2007)
Communication Power and Counter-power in the Network SocietyJournal of Communications
-
(2009)
What is an apparatus? Stanford, CA: Stanford -
(1964)
On distributed communications: VII the multiplexing station -
O. Sigurdson (2013)
Political TheologyPolitical Theology, 14
-
M. Castells (1996)
The rise of the network society -
(1973)
Grundrisse. London: Penguin
- Publisher
- SAGE
- Copyright
- © 2013 University of Wollongong, Australia
- ISSN
- 1326-365X
- eISSN
- 2321-5410
- DOI
- 10.1177/1326365X13517183
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
“The network” is a paradigm that dominates contemporary thought. Whether communicational, economic, political or computation, the concept of the network is regularly used to explain relationships between objects. The ontology of the network is heavily contested, and the political consequences are, at times, dire. Manuel Castells and Antonio Negri each argue for a networked form of communicational politics, but use reasonably different concepts of “power”. By accounting for the differences between these authors the tensions can be made apparent, and, more importantly, the political limits for each model become clear.
Journal
Asia Pacific Media Educator – SAGE
Published: Dec 1, 2013